Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gulshan Tara & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 15, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3322/2019 & CRL.M.A. 30898/2019 GULSHAN TARA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawan, Ms. Akshita Chhatwal and Mr. Vinay Duggal, Advocates. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pankaj. Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 3328/2019 & CRL.M.A. 30908/2019 DEEPAK CHAUDHARY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawan, Ms. Akshita Chhatwal and Mr. Vinay Duggal, Advocates. Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pankaj. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 108/2017 under Sections 308/323/3of IPC and FIR No.109/2017 CRL.M.C. 3322/2019 & 3328/2019 Page 1 of 3 under Sections 3of IPC both registe...
Dr Yamsani Srinivas vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5041/2018 and CM APPL. 19405-19406/2018 DR YAMSANI SRINIVAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rudra Kahlon, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma and Mr Chakraborty, Advocates for R-2/MCI. Abhijit CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1507.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the action of the Medical Council of India (MCI) to revoke the registration of the additional qualification granted to the petitioner. It is stated that the petitioner is a citizen of India and had completed his MBBS Degree Program from Ukraine.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is practicing as an MD in Scotland, United Kingdom. The petitioner claims to have completed the said course from the Membership of Royal College ...
Yogesh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3338/2019 YOGESH & ORS. Date of Order: July 15, 2019 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Rajbir Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.624/2014, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 19th December, 2017. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 3338/2019 Page 1 of 3 between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of mediated settlement of ...
Rahul Bulk Carrier vs.indian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Divisi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :15. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 7517/2019 RAHUL BULK CARRIER Through: Ms. Archna Midha, Mr. K.G. Bhagat, ........ Petitioner Advocates versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, MARKETING DIVISION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Mehta, Ms. Rishika Rana, Mr. Sarthak Khurana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT % G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner in this writ petition is an LPG Bulk Transporter and belongs to the SC category. The petitioner has been associated with the respondent company since the year 2017 as a LPG Bulk Transporter by road in the northern region. Notice Inviting E-Tenders was issued on 23.01.2018. The petitioner submitted his bid on 13.04.2018. His bid was confirmed by E-mail on 24.04.2018.... Petitioner was again informed on 23.11.2018 that his technical bid has been accepted.2. The petitioner sought a reply from the respondent under the W.P. (C) No.7517...
Communication Components Antenna Inc. Vs.ace Technologies Corp. And Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h May, 2019 Date of Decision:12. h July, 2019 CS (COMM) 1222/2018 COMMUNICATION COMPONENTS ANTENNA INC. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. C. S. Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Samik Mukherjee, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Aditya Goel and Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocates. (M:7585965845) ACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv., Mr. Shantanu Tyagi, Mr. Dev Robinson, Ms. Apoorva Murali and Ms. Surabhi Bhandari, Advocates for D-1 to 4. (M:9971161282) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 15222/2018, 1044/2019 & 1046/2019 (all stay applications) 1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of Indian Patent No.240893 (hereinafter, IN893). The patent is titled Asymmetrical Beams for Spectrum Efficiency. The Plaintiff is a Canadian company, manufacturing and selling, ce...
Aldanish Rein vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
2 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ALDANISH REIN + W.P.(CRL) 1871/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person with Ms.Shamshravish Rein, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aakash Varma, Mr. Prajesh V.S. and Mr. Prabudh Singh, Advocates % Date of Decision:12. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus against the indefinite detention of foreign inmates in Tihar Jail pending their deportation to their native countries.2. The petitioner, who is a Jail Visiting Advocate, states that as part of the duty assigned to him by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, he had visited Jail No.8/9, wherein an intimate told him on 04th July, 2019 that there are certain foreign inmates particularly belonging to Pakistan and Afgha...
Jagjeevan @ Jage Ram vs.airport Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 07.2019 LPA4442019 JAGJEEVAN @ JAGE RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajinder Nischal and Mr. Asish Nischal, Advocates. versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dig Vijay Rai and Ms. Chetna Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.30751/2019 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.30752/2019 (for delay) 2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 2 days in filing the appeal.3. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. LPA4442019 4. The appellant is aggrieved by the decision rendered by a Learned Single Judge of this Court dated 22.4.2019 by which W.P.(C) No.5356/2011 seeking the following prayers stands rejected:-"quash and set aside the ord...
Daya Meena vs.satish & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~11 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:12. 07.2019 C.R.P. No.193/2018 DAYA MEENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal and Ms. Shweta Tiwari, Advocates. versus SATISH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate for R1 & R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER1207.2019 1. There is no appearance on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4 despite service. Mr. Kumar states that he has been appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 before the Trial Court.2. The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 03.07.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-01, North- East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (ADJ) in CS No.139/2018 by which his application for return/adjustment of the court fees under Section 151 CPC was dismissed.3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a Civil Suit No.08/2014 for cancellation, declaration, eviction and CRP No.193/2018 Page 1 of 4 possession under Section 31 and...
Manoj Kumar vs.state of n.c.t of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 12, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3309/2019 & CRL.M.A. 30854/2019 MANOJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav K. Singh & Mr. Amit Saxena, Advocates. Versus STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Bal Kishan. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.568/2014, under Sections 467/471/420/475/406/506/201/120B of IPC registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 15th June, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by ASI Bal Kishan on the basis of identity proof produced by him. CRL.M.C. 3309/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, pr...
Mankind Pharma Limited vs.lee Pharmaceuticals of Lee House
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 483/2016 & CCP(O) 49/2015, I.A. 6903/2017 Date of decision:12. h July, 2019. MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Hemant Daswani & Mr. Anmol Saxena, Advocates (M-9810556744) versus LEE PHARMACEUTICALS OF LEE HOUSE ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant Lee Pharmaceuticals of Lee House from using the content of the Plaintiffs website. The Plaintiff Mankind Pharma Limited is, as the name suggests, a pharmaceutical company selling various medicinal preparations and over the counter drugs (OTCs). The Plaintiff has various domain names registered in its name with the mark MANKIND, however, the main website of the Plaintiff is www.mankindpharma.com. The said website has been originally designed by the Plaintiff to promote its business. It has a large amount of unique c...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »