Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivani vs.employee State Insurance Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 6657/2018 SHIVANI Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Mr. Amit Prakash ........ Petitioner Shahi, Advs. versus EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ...... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Singh and Ms. Nisha Hans, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1507.2019 The petitioner, who is an insured person, within the meaning % 1. of clause (14) in Section 2 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ESI Act) seeks, by means of the present writ petition, issuance of a writ of mandamus, to the respondent-Employee State Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ESIC), to issue, to her ward Ms. Ashi, a Ward of Insured Persons Certificate, so as to enable her to secure admission, in the MBBS course in an Institute affiliated to the ESIC, for the academic session 2018-2019. Inasmuch as, during the pendency of this w...
M/S Deccan Charters Private Limited vs.vikram Thapa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~26 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h July, 2019 M/S DECCAN CHARTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Surbhi Sharma, Advocate + W.P.(C) 4414/2017 VIKRAM THAPA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Gajendra Giri, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04th January, 2017 whereby the Industrial Tribunal held that the domestic inquiry conducted by the petitioner was violative of the principles of natural justice. The Industrial Tribunal directed the petitioner to pay interim compensation at the rate of 50% of the last drawn wages from the date of filing of application by the respondent.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent indulged in a serious misconduct. It was further submitted that the respondent was warned for his misbehavior towards customers, pilots and other members of the Company but he did not pay heed to the warnings issued against h...
N C Decors Pvt Ltd vs.ongc (A Public Enterprise) Through Its Chief Man ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:15. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6410/2019 N C DECORS PVT LTD Through: Mr. Ratnesh Kumar ........ Petitioner Shukla, Advocate. versus ONGC (A PUBLIC ENTERPRISE) THROUGH ITS CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR & ANR Through: Mr. Sunil K. ........ RESPONDENTS Jain, Ms. Reeta Chaudhary and Ms. Anusha Agarwal, Advocates. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Sole Proprietor for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner is a Company duly registered under the Companies Act, 1956 as a Micro and Small Enterprise with Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Government of India. Respondent No.1 invited bids through e-bid for annual repair and maintenance contract at Deendayal Urja Bhawan (DUB), Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, for a period of two years in the month of January, 2019. The petitioner submitted its bid online on 4.2.2019 and was found to be qualified in the tecno-commercial bid...
Anu Rani vs.vishwantra Dhama
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 07.2019 CRL.REV.P. 624/2019 ANU RANI versus VISHWANTRA DHAMA Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Ankit Mutreja, Adv. For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sheenu Chauhan, Adv. : JUDGMENT1505.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 12.03.2019 whereby the trial court has listed the matter for evidence.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial court had earlier heard the arguments on interim maintenance application and listed the matter on 26.10.2018 for orders.3. On 26.10.2018, directions were issued to the parties to file their income affidavits and the matter was adjourned to 29.11.2018. On CRL.REV.P.624/2019 Page 1 of 4 29.11.2018, the trial court noticed that the income affidavits of both the parties had been filed and thereafter the matter was listed for mediation, ho...
Suresh @Chotu & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)& Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 15, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3324/2019 SURESH @CHOTU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Rajbir Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.625/2014, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Alipur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st August, 2017. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 3324/2019 Page 1 of 3 between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms...
Directorate of Education & Anr vs.ankur & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h July, 2019 LPA4472019 DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR Through Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate. ..... Appellants % + CORAM: versus ANKUR & ANR Through None. ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL312482019 (exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL312492019 (delay in filing) 3. This is an application filed by the applicants/appellants seeking condonation of 46 days delay in filing the present LPA.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 46 days in filing the LPA is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. LPA4472019 6. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 22.04.2019 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court, by which, a writ petition filed by respondent no.1 assailing the order of termination dated 03.02.2018 was allowed. LPA. 44...
Arti Rani vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 04, 2019 Judgment delivered on: July 15, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4899/2019, CM No.21776/2019 ARTI RANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Mr. Chetan Lokur, Mr. Rajiv Sirohi and Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan and Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advs. with Mr. Vinod Mantoo, ALO, City CS Zone (Land and Building) Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:-"a) Set aside Order dated 25.04.2019 the Respondent Corporation, whereby the representation(s) of the... Petitioner for grant of extension of license of Hall No.1, Municipal Market, Karol Bagh, under Circular dated 22.07.2013 was rejected by the Respondent...
Aas Mohammad vs.sabiha Akhtar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA542019 & CM No.10906/2019 Judgment reserved on :19.03.2019 Date of decision :15. 07.2019. AAS MOHAMMAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhishek K. Goyal, Adv. versus SABIHA AKHTAR ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present Regular Second Appeal No.54/2019 assails the impugned judgment dated 22.01.2019 of the learned ADJ-04, South District, Saket Courts in Regular Civil Appeal No.71/2018 vide which the appeal RCA712018 against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2018 of the learned trial Court of the ASCJ- JSCC-GJ (South), Saket Courts in CS No.83348/2016,- was dismissed holding it to be not maintainable.2. Vide judgment dated 31.07.2018 in a suit filed by the plaintiff i.e. the respondent herein against the defendant i.e. the appellant herein contending to the effect that he is the absolute owner of the property i.e. 3rd floor of property bearing No.59-C, mea...
Deepak Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 15, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3322/2019 & CRL.M.A. 30898/2019 GULSHAN TARA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawan, Ms. Akshita Chhatwal and Mr. Vinay Duggal, Advocates. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pankaj. Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 3328/2019 & CRL.M.A. 30908/2019 DEEPAK CHAUDHARY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawan, Ms. Akshita Chhatwal and Mr. Vinay Duggal, Advocates. Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Pankaj. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 108/2017 under Sections 308/323/3of IPC and FIR No.109/2017 CRL.M.C. 3322/2019 & 3328/2019 Page 1 of 3 under Sections 3of IPC both registe...
Rishika Puri vs.nirmal Puri & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 07.2019 RFA No.448/2019 & C.M. Nos.22422/2019 (for direction regarding service of court order, 22424/2019 (for stay), 26125/2019 (for delay of 148 days in filing the appeal) RISHIKA PURI Through: Ms.Niti Richhariya, Adv. with ..... Appellant appellant in person. versus NIRMAL PURI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashwin Romy, proxy counsel for R-1 with R-1 in person. Mr.Manish Garg, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assails the judgment and decree dated 27.08.2018 passed by the learned Trial Court in CS No.141/2017 whereby the suit preferred by the respondent No.1 has been decreed for possession, on admission, by invoking Order XII Rule 6 CPC.2. The first respondent, aged about 73 years, is the mother-in- law of the appellant who is married to her son, i.e., respondent no.2. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »