Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raman Suri vs.delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5066/2017 RAMAN SURI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sujatha Balachander, Adv. versus DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima Gupta, SC for R- 1/DERC Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD/R-3 with Ms. Shivani Vij and Mr. Dachhita Shahi, Advs. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Aditya Gupta, Advs. for R- 2/BRPL Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Anurag and Ms.Sakshi Singh, Advs. for R-4 Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % D.N.PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) JUDGMENT1607.2019 1. This public interest litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers: W.P.(C) 5066/2017 Page 1 of 9 2. (i) Direct Respondent No.1 and 2 to take appropriate enforcement action to reduce electricity theft and consequently reduce Aggregate Technical & Commercial Losses; (ii) Direct Respondent No.1, 2 and 3 to t...
Divyansh Tyagi vs.indraprastha Institute of Information Technology & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :04. 07.2019 Date of decision:15. 07.2019 W.P.(C) 6902/2019 & CM APPL.28708/2019 DIVYANSH TYAGI ....... Petitioner Through Mr. Mayank Sapra, Mr. Arjun Natrajan, Advocates. versus INDRAPRASTHA INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. for R-3. Ms. Hafsa Khan, Adv. for R-5. And + W.P.(C) 7081/2019 & CM Nos. 29520/2019 & 29521/2019 PRAGYA GUPTA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Mayank Sapra and Mr.Arjun Natrajan, Advocates versus INDRAPRASTHA INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arjun Mitra, Adv for R-1 Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv for R- 2 Mr.Amit Bansal, Adv for R-3 Ms.Hafsa Khan, Av for R-5 W.P. (C) 6902-7081/2019 Page 1 of 32 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners of both writ petitions i.e. W.P.(C)6902/2019 & W.P.(C)7081/2019 are based in Delhi and engi...
Union of India & Ors vs.vinod Kumar Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of judgment:15. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 12632/2018, C.M. Appl. No.49053/2018, 49055/2018 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P.S. Singh, Senior Panel Counsel. versus VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate with Mr. Fidel Sebastian, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT % G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 23.02.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) the Union of India has filed the present writ petition. The respondents had approached the Tribunal seeking directions for payment of salary, allowances, leave and other mandatory benefits in the nature of basic pay in the applicable grade to the post of Staff Nurses plus Grade Pay plus dearness allowances plus House Rent Allowance, travel allowance, washing allowance as well as Casual leave, medical leaves, including the benefits of materni...
Sanjay Kapur & Ors. Vs.vikram Kapur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) 398/2015 & I.A. No.6469/2019 Date of Decision :15. h July, 2019 SANJAY KAPUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sudhir Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Meenakshi Singh, Adv. versus VIKRAM KAPUR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.D.K.Sabharwal, Mr.Sameer Bhatnagar, Advs. for R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioners inter alia praying for the following reliefs:-"a) Direct that the proceedings titled Bijender vs. Sanjay Kapur & Ors. pending in the Court of learned Assistant Collector, 1st Grade, Panipat shall remain stayed; O.M.P. (I) No.398/2015 Page 1 2. It is the case of the petitioners that by an MOU dated 08.01.1999, the three groups of legal heirs of Late Sh.Janki Das Kapur had agreed to split the ownership, management and / or control of the compan...
Ramveer vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : July 03, 2019 Date of decision: July 15, 2019 CRL.A. 157/2010 RAMVEER STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Sneha Upadhyay and Mr. Tilak Angra, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M.Farooqui, APP for the State. WSI Jyoti and ASI Deepchand, PS Model Town. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.By the instant Regular Appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C., the appellant assails the judgment dated 14.12.2009 passed by the ld. ASJ (West-04), where-under, the appellant has come to be convicted for the commission of the offence under Section 307 IPC and vide the impugned order on sentence dated 06.01.2010 sentenced to 4 years RI and fine of CRL. A. 157/2010 Page 1 of 12 Rs.10,000/- ID3months SI while extending the benefit under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Facts giving rise to the trial of the offence, for which the appellant 2. faced trial, can be put in brief. On 20.08.2002 at 4.00 ...
Aman Vyas vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 3964/2018 & Crl.M.A.Nos.50758-59/2018 Reserved on:30th May 2019 Delivered on:15th July , 2019 AMAN VYAS Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Ms. Heena and Mr. Nishat, ........ Petitioner Tangri Advocates UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Mr. Anuj Handa, Ms. Radha Lakshmi, Ms. Sanya Handa, Mr. Rajat and Mr. Krishna Saket Chandra, Advocates. W.P.(CRL) 468/2019 AMAN VYAS Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Ms. Heena and Mr. Nishat, ........ Petitioner Tangri Advocates UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Mr. Anuj Handa, Ms. Radha Lakshmi, Ms. Sanya Handa, Mr. Rajat Krishna and Mr. Saket Chandra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the writ petition being W.P.(CRL) 3964/2018 the petitioner seeks quashing of final order cum inquiry report dated 17th December 2018 passed W.P.(CRL) Nos. 3964/2018 & 468/2019 Page 1 of 27 by the Learned Additional Chief...
Sh. Joginder Kumar @ Jonny vs.the State & Ors.(nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 15, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3327/2019 SH. JOGINDER KUMAR @ JONNY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Basant Kr. Gautam and Mr. Siddharth, Advocates. versus THE STATE & ORS.(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Gajender. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 30904/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3327/2019 Quashing of FIR No.561/2014 under Sections 323/452/354-A of IPC, registered at Police Station Bawana, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 10th July, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in que...
Saurabh Jain vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1343/2019 Judgment delivered on:15. 07.2019 SAURABH JAIN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Shail Kr. Dwivedi, Mr. Siddharth Krishna Dwivedi and Mr. Mohd. Sohail, Advs. Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vikram Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.57/2019 under Sections 420/408/468/4of the IPC, Police Station Hauz Khas.2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of Ms. Ambika Pillai, contending that the petitioner was employed as an Accountant by her and was handling her accounts. During examination of record, she found that there were several discrepancies in the accounts and further that he has employed his wife and started paying salary to her. BAIL APPLN. 1343/2019 Page 1 of 3 There are allegation...
Const. Virender vs.the Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * + Date of Decision:15. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6672/2019 CONST. VIRENDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocate. Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel GNCTD (Services) with Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) CM No.281We have heard the submissions of counsel for the petitioner and perused the application. The application is allowed. W.P.(C) No.66& CM No.2811. The petitioner has filed the present writ of certiorari seeking quashing of order dated 14.12.2016 passed by the Principal W.P.(C.) No.6672/2019 Page 1 of 10 Bench of Central administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.2559 of 2013 and he also seeks quashing of orders dated 29.06.2011 and 31.10.2012 passed by the disciplinary and appellate authorities respectively. The petitioner has been awarded punishmen...
Tata Sons Ltd. Vs.mr Prakash Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2019
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h July, 2019 CS (COMM) 383/2018 & I.A. 10439/2015 TATA SONS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr. Akshay Agarwal and Mr. Achuttam, Advocates (M:98999. 6591). versus MR PRAKASH YADAV & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ashok Kotnala, Advocate for Contemnor No.2 (M:95991. 8309). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit is for permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademarks, passing off, dilution and tarnishment of trademarks, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, etc. The suit has been filed by M/s Tata Sons Limited, which is now known as M/s Tata Sons Private Limited. The Plaintiff was established in 1917 and is the promoter and principal investment holding company of the House of TATA, which had a turnover of more than 100 billion US dollars in 2013-14. Tata is one of the most well-known brands of India and is engaged i...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »