Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dd Gears Employees Union vs.dd Gears Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. h July, 2019 LPA1112019 DD GEARS EMPLOYEES UNION Through Mr. Mishal Johari, Advocate ..... Appellant versus DD GEARS LIMITED & ANR Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL71222019(delay) & CM.APPL71232019(delay in re-filing) & LPA1112019 1. The application being CM.APPL71222019 has been filed seeking condonation of 901 days delay in filing the present appeal. Another application being CM.APPL71232019 has been filed seeking condonation of 472 days in re-filing the appeal. The grounds seeking condonation of delay in CM APPL71222019 finds mentioned in para 3 of the application. Para 3 is being reproduced below: That the delay in filing the appeal is since most 3. documents filed before in WP(C).10and WP(C).76were lying with the members of the petitioner union at their native hometowns due to which arranging and constructing the do...
Sheladia Associates vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 1789/2019 and CM Nos.8372/2019, 9353/2019, 13080/2019, 13085/2019 & 16813/2019 SHELADIA ASSOCIATES Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr Chirag M. Shroff, Ms Sanjana Nangia, Mr Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms Natasha Vij, Advocates. :Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms Madhu Sweta and Ms Kanika Tandon, Advocates. Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC for UOI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning a Circular (hereafter the impugned order) dated 06.02.2019 issued by respondent no.2 (National Highways Authority of India hereafter NHAI) debarring the petitioner from participating in any work connected with NHAI for a period of one year. W.P.(C) 1789/2019 Page 1 of...
The State, Govt. Of Nct of Delhi vs.tufail
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
1 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 303/2019 THE STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Sonu Ram, PS Subhash Place. TUFAIL versus Through: None. ..... Respondent Date of Decision:16. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed under Section 378(1) Cr.P.C. by the State, against the judgment and order dated 14th January, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-01, (North-West), Special Court (POCSO), Rohini Courts, in Sessions Case No.25/2016 arising out of FIR No.1020/2015 registered with Police Station Subhash Place under Sections 363/354/376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act whereby the learned trial Court convicted the accused under Sections 363 and 506 IPC, but acquitted him under Section 6 POCSO Act. Page 1 of 7 Crl.L.P.303/2019 2. Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, learned APP for State submits...
Vishal Chawla vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: May 09, 2019 Pronounced on: July 16, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 1168/2018 & CRL.M.As. 50351-50352/2018 VISHAL CHAWLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey, Mr. Mrinal Bharti, Mr. Arham, Mr. Siddharth Bajpai, Mr. Kushank Sindhu & Ms. Pinky Dubey, Advocates STATE Versus Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for State with WSI Manisha Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER Vide impugned order of 30th November, 2018, petitioner has been put on trial on the charge which reads as under:-"That on the intervening night of 28/29.09.2017 at your house bearing No.B-20, Ist Floor, Maharani Bagh, NFC, New Delhi within the jurisdiction of P.S. New Friends Colony, you had committed rape upon victim Ms. MD, W/O Sh. RKD, aged about 32 years (particulars withheld as per law but Crl. Rev. P. 1168/2018 Page 1 of 6 explained ...
Asha Chawla vs.m/s Amrapali Aadya Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd. And A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2019 + CS(OS) 76/2018 & I.As. 2496/2018, 2029/2019, 2266/2019 ASHA CHAWLA ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Mr. Sumit Chander & Mr. Gurdeep Chauhan, Advocates (M-9810024126) versus M/S AMRAPALI AADYA TRADING & INVESTMENT PVT. ..... Defendants LTD. AND ANR Through: Mr. Hitesh Kumar & Mr. Sahil Sood, (M- R-1&2 for Advocates 9999091265) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff, who is a resident of 1. Dublin, through her Power of Attorney holder. The Plaintiff is an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) and she seeks recovery of a sum of Rs.3,95,14,172/- from M/s Amrapali Aadya Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd. and its Director Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sinha, who are arrayed as Defendants No.1 and 2.2. The case of the Plaintiff is that in the year 2013, the Defendants approached her through one of their agents with an offer to provide stock broking s...
Phoolo Dev @ Phoolwari vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2283/2019 & CMs 23335/19, 22400/19, 10665/19, 224PHOOLO DEV @ PHOOLWARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, versus Advocate NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kriti Sinha, Advocate for Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC for respondent No.1-NDMC Mr.Madhav Nanda, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Anand V. Khatri, Advocate for respondent No.3 with SI Rakesh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER1607.2019 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for the following reliefs: - a. Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No.1 and 3 not to dispossess the Petition from her vending site at Janpath Lane, Telephone Box near Gupta Pan Bhandar, Behind Bank of Baroda building, Janpath, New Delhi, on the premise of the order dated 17.08.2017 passed by this Honble Court in W.P.(C) 11519/2016 or any other or...
Farhan Shaikh vs.state (National Investigation Agency)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. 07.2019 Judgment delivered on:16. 07.2019 CRL.A. 871/2018 FARHAN SHAIKH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal with Ms.Rupali Samuel and Mr. Vishakh Ranjit, Advocates. versus STATE (NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, SPP (NIA) with Mr. Abhishek Bagai, PP (NIA) and Mr. Ahmad Ziad, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.CRL.M.A. 30949-30951/2018 1. The aforesaid applications have been preferred by the appellant to seek condonation of 314 days in filing the present appeal, and condonation of further 44 days in re-filing the appeal. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374 and 375 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (The code) read with Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (The NIA Act for short). CRL.A. 871/2018 Page 1 of 49 2. The appellant has preferred t...
Mukesh Kumar Srivastava vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6837/2019 and CM APPL. 28537/2019 MUKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Prateek Tushar Mohanty, Ms Payal Mohanty and Mr Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Sarvan Kumar Shukla and Mr Mukesh Kumar Pandey, Advocates for UOI. Mr Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with Mr Chaitanya Gosain and Mr Anand, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1607.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the e-mail dated 03.04.2019, whereby respondent no.2 (The First Secretary (CPV), Embassy of India, Rome) had rejected the petitioners request to change the date of birth of the petitioner in the petitioners passport. The petitioner further prays for issuance of W.P.(C) 6837/2019 Page 1 of 10 directions to the respondents to change the date of birth of the petitioner...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr. Vs.v D Pushkarna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 07.2019 $~14. * + % W.P.(C.) No.11706/2016 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC along with Mr.Amresh Goyal from Office of DG (Prison). versus V D PUSHKARNA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sushil Bajaj, Mr. Bhavook Chauhaan & Ms. Aasifa Sheikh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Government of NCT of Delhi has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 31.08.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.4527/2014. The Tribunal allowed the said Original Application preferred by the respondent to assail initiation of departmental proceedings against him. The two issues on which the Tribunal allowed the Original Application were: Firstly, that the petitioner was not competent to initiate W.P.(C.) No.11706/2016 Page 1 of 4 departmental pro...
Bhawan Khandelwal & Ors. Vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 327/2019 Decided on:-"16th July, 2019 BHAWAN KHANDELWAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Singh, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ranbir Singh, PS Mahendra Park. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 05.03.2016 at Alwar, Rajasthan. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and being deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.473/2017 having been registered by police station Mahendra Park, Delhi, on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his fa...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »