Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Innovative B2b Logistics Solution Private Limited vs.central Warehousi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 04.2019 Date of Decision:16. 07.2019 + O.M.P. 257/2015 & I.A. No.15697/2018 INNOVATIVE B2B LOGISTICS SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Sacchin Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rahul Khosla, Mr.Pankaj Prakash, Mr.Kamil Khan, Mr.Sarang Rastogi, Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Mr.Dhan Singh, Advs. versus CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K.K.Tyagi, Mr.Iftekhar Ahmad, Mr.Anoop Kumar, Advs. (18) O.M.P. 284/2015 CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K.K.Tyagi, Mr.Iftekhar Ahmad, Mr.Anoop Kumar, Advs. versus INNOVATIVE B2B LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Sacchin Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rahul Khosla, Mr.Pankaj Prakash, Mr.Kamil Khan, Mr.Sarang Rastogi, Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Mr.Dhan Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 T...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.farahat Khanam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. 07.2019 MAC.APP. 178/2019 & CM No.4824/2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Himanshu Gambhir and Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates. $~21 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. FARAHAT KHANAM & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Pathak and Mr. N. Pandey, Advocates for Claimants. The appellant Insurance Company impugns the award of Rs.40,000/- and Rs.50,000/- under the non-pecuniary heads of loss of consortium and loss of love and affection respectively, for each of the claimant. It is the appellants case that in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC680 the impugned order has erred. However, the Court would note that Pranay Sethi (supra) was duly considered in a subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors. 2018 S...
Aperam Alloys Imphy Sas vs.iup Jindal Metals and Alloys Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
* % + + Versus IUP JINDAL METALS AND ALLOYS LIMITED CS(COMM) Nos.1314/2016 & 45/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2019 CS(COMM) 1314/2016 & IA No.6194/2018 (of the plaintiff under Order XIII-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015) JINDAL SAW LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Mr. Parinay T. Vasandani, Ms. Abhilasha Singh, Mr. Nikhil Pratap and Ms. Aastha Bajaj, Advs. Versus APERAM STAINLESS SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS PRECISION SAS AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Zeba Khair, Ms. Shivambika Sinha, Ms. Mishika Singh and Ms. Anandita Sharma, Advs. for D-1&2. AND CS(COMM) 45/2017 APERAM ALLOYS IMPHY SAS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Zeba Khair, Ms. Shivambika Sinha, Ms. Mishika Singh and Ms. Anandita Sharma, Advs. for D-1&2. ..... Defendant Page 1 of 50 Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Pardasani, Mr. Parinay T. Vasand...
Exxon Mobil Corporation vs.exoncorp Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h May, 2019 Date of decision:16. h July, 2019 + CS (COMM) 111/2019 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Anuradha Salhotra, Mr. Sumit Wadhwa and Ms. Meenakshi Prasad, Advocates. versus EXONCORP PRIVATE LIMITED .... Defendant Through: Mr. Karan Johri and Mr. Amit Saxena, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT CS (COMM) 111/2019 and I.A. No.3119/2019 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) 1. The present suit is filed by the Plaintiff Exxon Mobil Corporation against the Defendant Exoncorp Private Limited seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, delivery up and rendition of accounts.2. The suit concerns the trademark EXXON and the use of the mark EXON by the Defendant as part of its corporate name and trading style for rendering information technology services. The Plaintiff commenced its business in 1882 and adopted the word EXXON as its trademark si...
Vinod Rana vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~ * + STATE % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.760/2018 VINOD RANA Through: Ms.Kavita Jha, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr.Rajeev Jha, Advocates. versus Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the ..... Respondent State with SI Pramodh Kumar and SI Satish Singh, PS Mayur Vihar. Date of Decision:16. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict challenging the judgment as well as order on sentence dated 02nd April, 2018 and 07th April, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-03 (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi respectively in Sessions Case No.672/2016 arising from FIR No.620/2014 under Section 302 IPC registered with PS Mayur Vihar, whereby the appellant-convict had been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Page 1 of 31 Crl.A.760/2018 CASE OF THE PROSECUTION2 The prosecution case in bri...
M/S Gail(india) Ltd vs.m/s Reliance Industries Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:19. 03.2019 Date of Decision :16. 07.2019 O.M.P. 648/2012 M/S GAIL(INDIA) LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Dhruv Mehta,Sr. Adv. with Ms.Manmeet Arora, Mr.Sarad K Sunny & Mr.Harkirat Singh, Advs. versus M/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Paras Kuhad, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K.R. Sariprabhu, Mr.Shubranshu Padhi, Mr.Jitin Chaturvedi, Ms.Aditi Tripathi, Mr.Shuaib Hussain, Mr.Kavin and Mr.Vishnu Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 A common judgment has been passed with the lead case being O.M.P. 597/2012 titled Reliance Industries Ltd. v. GAIL (India) Ltd. For the reasons stated therein, the present petition is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs.2. A copy of the aforesaid order in O.M.P. 597/2012 is placed below. NAVIN CHAWLA, J JULY16 2019/Arya Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 03.2019 Date of Decision :16. 07.2019 + O.M.P. 597/2012 & IA119562012 RELIAN...
Shiriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.manoj Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. 07.2019 MAC.APP. 211/2019 & CM No.5895/2019 $~28 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. The appellant has impugned Versus SHIRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Mahajan, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. the award of compensation of Rs.13,34,000/- for the injuries suffered by respondent No.1 Manoj Kumar in a motor vehicular accident. It was the claimants case that the injuries occurred on account of the insured vehicle being driven in a rash and negligent manner on the wrong side of a public road. The accident had happened in broad daylight, at about 1.45 pm on 26.05.2014, when the claimant riding his motorcycle reached Raj Nagar Extension, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, suddenly a mini truck, driven in a rash and negligent manner, came from the wrong side of the road, struck against his motorc...
Natco Pharma Ltd vs.bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~79 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 160/2019 and C.M.No.31063/2019 NATCO PHARMA LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sai Deepak, Mrs. Rajeshwari, Mr.G.Nataraj and Ms.Radhika Roy, Advocates. versus BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB HOLDINGS IRELAND UNLIMITED COMPANY& ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Anand, Ms.Archana Mr.Pravin Shankar, Mr.Dhruv Anand, Ms.Tusha Malhotra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal, Ms. Rashi Punin, Ms.Ridhie Bajaj, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1607.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the... RESPONDENTS. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties the appeal has been heard finally.2. This appeal by the Defendant in CS (COMM) 342 of 2019 is directed against an order dated 5th July 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in IA No.8873 of 2019 in the said suit whereby inter alia the Appellant was restrained from infringing Indian Patent IN No.2473...
State (Gnct of Delhi) vs.hargovind
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
$~10 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 334/2018 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Judgment pronounced on:16. h July, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Aashaa Tewari, APP for State with Inspector Jagdish Yadav and SI Ashish Kumar, PS Gokul Puri. versus HARGOVIND Through: Mr.S.S. Ahluwalia, ..... Respondent Advocate for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL MANMOHAN, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the State challenging the order of acquittal dated 15.09.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in FIR No.36/2013 registered with Police Station Gokulpuri, under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.2. The Trial Court in its impugned judgment has given benefit of doubt to the respondent/accused and acquitted the respondent of the offences under Sections 363/366/379 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. Relevant portion of the impugned judgment dated 15.09....
Surendra Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 16, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3360/2019 SURENDRA KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Karabi Das, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Rajbir Singh Mr. Sarvesh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 31026/2019 Delay of 175 days in re-filing the accompanying petition is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3360/2019 Quashing of FIR No.83/2012, under Sections 498A/406 of IPC, registered at Police Station Moti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 18th April, 2018 and affidavit of 22nd February, 2019 of respondent No.2/complainant. Crl.M.C. 3360/2019 Page 1 of 3 Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in Court, is the compl...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »