Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs.darshna Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~44 * % + MAC.APP. 672/2019, CM APPL. 31634/2019 & CM APPL. Decided on:17. 07.2019 31635/2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. versus DARSHNA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation to the respondents on the ground that it has erred both in facts and in law. One Sh. Raghvinder Singh, who was employed in the rank of EHC with Ist Indian Reserve Battalion (IRB) died in a motor vehicle accident on 17.12.2015, when he was hit by a vehicle which was being driven in a rash and negligent manner. It was so severe that the deceased fell on the road at a distance of almost 60 to 70 feet from where he was struck by the offending vehicle and died on the spot. The driver managed to run away with the offending vehicle. The offending vehicle was insured with the appellant.2. The involvement culpabilit...
Master Harsha d.s. (Minor) Through His Father Shankarappa d.s. And Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 8503/2017 BABY DEVANANDA D (MINOR) THR HER MOTHER DEEPA S AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal with Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Advocates versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Amicus Curiae and Advocate with Ms. Sonali Malik, Advocate. Mr.Yakesh Anand and Mr.Nimit Mathur, Advocates with Dr.Naresh Kumar Arora, Addl. Director (Insp.) and Mr. Dhruv Prasad, UDC for ESIC. Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr.Hari Shankar Sharma, Advocates for UOI/R-2 and 3. Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr. Kotla Harshavardhan, Ms. Mansi Sood and Mr. Gaurav Sansanwal, Advocates for Sanofi Genzyme. AND + W.P.(C) 699/2018 MASTER HARSHA D.S. (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER SHANKARAPPA D.S. AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal with Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Advocates W.Ps.(C)8503/2017 & 699/2018 Page 1 of 56 versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through ...
Sudima International Pvt. Ltd. Vs.patel Wood Products Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2019. CS(COMM) 56/2018 & IA No.1207/2018 (for condonation of 730 days delay in filing) SUDIMA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Rajiv B. Samaiyar, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus Through: PATEL WOOD PRODUCTS LTD. none. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.1208/2018 (for exemption). ..... Defendant 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CS(COMM) 56/2018 & IA No.1207/2018 (for condonation of 730 days delay in filing).3. The plaintiff, claiming to be incorporated under the laws of Singapore, has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.2,39,80,432/- from the defendant company, incorporated under the laws of India, pleading that (i) the defendant had imported three consignments of timber from the plaintiff in the month of May, 2011; (ii) all the three consignments were dispatched by the plaintiff on 26th May, 2011 and invoices for USD12753.21, USD15037.05 and USD16...
Hemant Gupta vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~45 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:17. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6875/2019 & CM APPL.28623/2019 MONICA ANAND KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Hemant Gupta, Mr.Alok Sharma, Ms.Sunakshi Gupta, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr.Farman Ali, Mr.Aman Malik, Mr.Mohd.Shahan Ulla, Advocates + W.P.(C) 6899/2019 & CM APPL.28688/2019 1. HEMANT GUPTA Through: In person versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent UNION OF INDIA Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioners have challenged the selection process for the post of Member of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.2. Vide circular dated 06th July, 2018, the Government invited applications for appointment to the posts of Member (Judicial/Accountant), W.P.(C) 6875/2019 & W.P.(C) 6899/2019 Page 1 of 5 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The qualifications of the Judicial Member, ITAT as given in para...
Devinder Sehrawat vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:17. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8686/2018 and CM Nos.33337/2018, 48394/2018 DEVINDER SEHRAWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Mridul, Mr. Sumit Mamgain, Mr. Shalaj Mridul, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for R-1 and 3 with Mr. Kamaldeep, Adv. and Mr. Rajiv Sharma, EE (CPWD) Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, SC-DDA with Ms. Nazia Parveen, Adv. for R-4/DDA Ms. Garima Prashad, SC for R-5/DMRC CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR D.N.PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) JUDGMENT CM No.48394/2018 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.1. 2. W.P.(C) 8686/2018 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 8686/2018 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred for the following prayers : a) pass necessary directions to the... RESPONDENTS to make provisions for a safe passage for the residents in t...
Suzuki Motor vs.suzuki (India) Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~ * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 235/2018 & I.A.8507/2019 Date of Decision:17. h July, 2019 SUZUKI MOTOR ... Plaintiff Through: Mr. C.D. Mulherkar and Ms. Anushka Arora, Advocates. versus SUZUKI (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Anjana Ahluwalia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from infringing their trade mark Suzuki, passing off and rendition of accounts.2. Vide interim order dated 12th December, 2005, this Court restrained the defendants from using the word Suzuki as part of their trade name/corporate name.3. Defendant No.3 was deleted from the array of the parties on 07th March, 2007. Defendant No.2 ceased to be the Director of defendant No.1 on 03rd May, 1984 and is, therefore, not a necessary party. Defendant No.2 is also deleted from the array of the parties. The sole defendant No.1 is hereinafter referred to as the defenda...
Rajni Gupta vs.hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :17. h July, 2019 + LPA4312019 and CM No.30144-30145/2019 RAJNI GUPTA Through: Mr. Roopesh Kanwar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rikesh Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.30144/2019 (condonation of delay) 1. This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of five days in preferring this appeal.2. Having heard learned Counsel for the appellant (original petitioner) and looking to the reasons stated in this application, there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay, we therefore condone the delay in preferring this appeal. LPA4312019 Page 1 of 4 3. The application is allowed and disposed of. CM No.30145/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.4.5. LPA43...
Sbi General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.shakuntala & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~51 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. 07.2019 MAC.APP. 676/2019, CM APPLs. 31740-41/2019 SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. versus SHAKUNTALA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award only apropos the quantum of compensation on the ground that the Income Tax Returns (ITR) for two years of the deceased which was which filed after his unfortunate demise was taken into consideration.2. It is the appellants argument that if the deceased was a regular income tax payee then the ITRs of the previous two years prior to his demise ought to have also been taken into consideration so that the Tribunal could have satisfied itself that the ITRs were not solely built up for the sake of claiming an inflated compensation. MAC.APP. No.676/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. The ITRs were filed for the Assessment Years (AY) 2013-14 & 2014- 15. The accident happen...
Sh. r.p. Gupta vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 05, 2019 Pronounced on: July 17, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4984/2018 and CRL.M.A. 33208/2018 & CRL.M.As. 5733-5734/2019 CRL.M.C. 4981/2018 and CRL.M.A. 33202/2018 CRL.M.C. 4980/2018 and CRL.M.A. 33200/2018 CRL.M.C. 4983/2018 and CRL.M.A. 33206/2018 CRL.M.C. 4982/2018 and CRL.M.A. 33204/2018 CRL.M.C. 4969/2018 and CRL.M.A. 33143/2018 + + + + + SHIVOM MINERALS LIMITED & ORS. SH. R.P. GUPTA .....Petitioners STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Kr. Dhatwalia, Ms. Iti Sharma and Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. .....Respondents Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh & Ms. Deepa Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER In the above captioned six petitions quashing of complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the summoning orders was sought initially on the ground that the cheques in qu...
Paavani Gupta vs.central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~25 * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA No.453/2019 & CM No.316PAAVANI GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Gupta and Mr. Ajay Gupta, Senior Advocates along with Ms. Mona Singh and Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocates versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ORDER1707.2019 This appeal is directed against the judgement dated 04.07.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) No.7062/2019 filed by the appellant/petitioner seeking directions to the respondent/Central Board of Secondary Education (in short CBSE) to conduct a re-valuation of the marks obtained by her in class 12th CBSE AISSCE Examination, conducted in March, 2019.2. The facts of the case as set out in the writ petition are that the appellant was a student in Delhi Public School, RK Puram with an outstanding academic and extra-curricular career. In the examination conducted by th...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »