Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ssmp Industries Ltd. Vs.perkan Food Processors Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-18-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h July, 2019 + CS (COMM) 470/2016 & CC(COMM) 73/2017 SSMP INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocate. versus (M:9868401295) PERKAN FOOD PROCESSORS PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Kumar Sudeep, Advocate. (M:9560971646) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. An interesting issue has arisen in this matter in respect of the interpretation of Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter the Code). The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking recovery of Rs.1,61,47,336.44. The Plaintiff had placed an order on the Defendant for purchase of Totapari Mango pulp. As part of the said transaction, it is the case of the Plaintiff that an agreement had been entered into, supplies were made and various amounts are due towards excess payments, damages and other costs. The Defendant has filed its written statement/counter claim in which it avers that it ...
Delhi Development Authority vs.m/s k.c Chibber & Co
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-18-2019
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h July, 2019 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY O.M.P. 768/2011 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing counsel (M-9910247777) versus M/S K.C CHIBBER & CO ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.C. Chibber, present in person CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH (M-981052876) Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The Respondent (`Contractor) was awarded a contract for 1. construction of 936 Janta Houses at Pitampura (Poorvi), Pocket-V, Delhi, by the DDA. Disputes had arisen between the parties. The contractor had preferred various claims and the DDA had raised its counter claims. The claims of the contractor were allowed and the counter claims were dismissed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator Mr. O.P. Goel vide his award dated 30th December, 2005. The said award was challenged before this Court and vide judgment dated 23rd July, 2009, a Ld. Single Judge had set aside the entire award in the following terms: 17. I consider that in such a ...
Gurnam Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-18-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3439/2019 GURNAM SINGH Date of Order: July 18, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Sinha, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Bimati. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1105/2018, under Sections 354(A)/354(D) of IPC, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 27th June, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by W/SI Bimati, on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 3439/2019 Page 1 of 3... RESPONDENTS No.2,...
Nishant Mittal vs.commissioner of Police, Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7653/2019 & CM No.31835/2019 NISHANT MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr D. K. Yati, Advocate alongwith petitioner in person. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr Ishan Agarwal, Advocate with SI Anil, Licencing Unit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER1707.2019 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. impugning an order dated 31.05.2019 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.1 (the Commissioner of Police) rejecting the petitioners appeal against an order dated 24.04.2019 passed by the Licencing Authority, cancelling the Registration Certificate issued to the petitioner under the Delhi Eating Houses Registration Regulation 1980 to operate an Eating House at premises bearing no.23-B, Ground Floor and Mezzanine Floor, Panchkuian Road, New Delhi.2. of The petitioner was operating...
Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd & Anr vs.pawajot Kaur Bawej ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 817/2018, IA No.5583/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.6193/2018 (u/S151CPC) TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Adit Pujari & Ms. Tusharika Mattoo, Advs. Versus PAWAJOT KAUR BAWEJA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kshitij Sharda, Adv. for D-1&3. Mr. Sambit Nanda, Adv. for D-2. % ORDER1707.2019 Review Petition No.124/2019 (of the plaintiffs for review of the order dated 11th March, 2019) 1. The two plaintiffs viz. Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd., India and Transformative Learning Pte. Ltd., Singapore have instituted this suit for permanent injunction to restrain the three defendants namely Pawajot Kaur Baweja, Aastha Jain & Adya Ayurveda from, (i) disclosing or using in any manner whatsoever any confidential information, trade secrets or any other information pertaining to the bus...
Anil Kumar & Ors. Vs.the Management of M/S Richa & Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~5 * % + CORAM: Date of Judgment IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA2322016, C.M.Nos.13130/2016 & 37251/2018 ANIL KUMAR & ORS. THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S RICHA & CO. Through: Mr.Rajat Sharma, advocate versus Through: Mr.Anurag Ranjan, Advocate ..... Respondent :17. h July, 2019 ..... Appellants HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. 13130/2016 (delay) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellants seeking condonation of delay in filing the present appeal.2. There is no opposition to the prayer made in the application. Accordingly, the delay of 154 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. C.M. 37251/2018 (amendment) 4. The present application has been filed by the appellants seeking amendment in the name and address of the sole respondent.5. There is no opposition to prayer made in the application.6. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Amended ...
Mohd. Mustkeem & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 17, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3408/2019 & Crl.M.A. 3178/2019 MOHD. MUSTKEEM & ORS. Through: Mr. Salim Malik, Advocate. ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Ashish Kumar Mr. Arvind Nagar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.344/2010, under Sections 498A/4of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 30th May, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ashish Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits t...
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.indira & Ors. (Iffco-Tokio Gene ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~18 to 20 * % + MAC.APP. 224/2019 & CM APPL. 6222/2019 Decided on:17. 07.2019 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Jain and Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Advocates. versus RAM BHATERI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for R-1. Dr. Puran Chand, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Jitender Vashisht and Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Advocate for R-5. + MAC.APP. 225/2019 & CM APPL. 6226/2019 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Jain and Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Advocates. versus INDIRA & ORS (IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.) Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS R-1 to R-5. Dr. Puran Chand, Advocate for R-6 & R-7. MAC.APP. Nos. 224, 225 & 227/2019 Page 1 of 8 Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Advocate for R-9. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Jitender Vashisht and Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for R-8. + MAC.APP. 22...
Lalit vs.state Govt Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~13 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : July 17, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 623/2019 LALIT ........ Petitioner Through Mr. R.N. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr. H.S. Singh, Mr. Sachin Choudhary, Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Pradeer Sharma and Mr. Abhiesumat Gupta, Advs. versus STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with Mr. Satish Kain, ACP, Insp. Paras Nath Verma, SHO, SI Surendra Singh and SI Amit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA ORDER A.K.CHAWLA, J.(Oral) By the instant bail application, the applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.163/2018 under Section 307 IPC, 25/27/Arms Act PS South Campus. As per the FIR, incident occurred at about 10.40 p.m. on 29.07.2018 near Mother Dairy, Satya Niketan, New Delhi. In the statement of the injured, he has specifically named the applicant for having fired the BAIL APPLN. 623/2019 Page 1 of 5 shots with the revolver in the stomach and the thigh. Charge-sheet is sta...
Vinay Aggarwal vs.rims Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2019
$~OS-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(COMM) 428/2017 VINAY AGGARWAL Date of decision:17. 07.2019 ..... Plaintiff Through M.Smita Jain and Mr.Abhay Singh, Advs. Versus RIMS MARKETING PVT. LTD. Through Mr.Gaurav Pathak, Adv. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA Nos.7107/2017 & 2050/2018 1. Present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from selling, manufacturing, offering for sale, advertising etc. directly or indirectly dealing in goods inter alia LOCKS and other allied and cognate goods under the trade mark/label ELEPHANT or any other trade mark incorporating the word ELEPHANT either as a prefix or suffix or device of Elephant or any other deceptively similar trade mark/domain name so as to amount to passing off. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. The case of the plaintiff is that drawer locks under the mark/label ELEPHANT are being manufactured by DALI METAL...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »