Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yogesh Yadav vs.the Director General Resettlement & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~40 * + W.P.(C) 7711/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI YOGESH YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Yadav, Advocate. versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL RESETTLEMENT & ORS Through: Mr K. V. Sreemithun, Sr. Panel ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for R-1, R-2 and R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1907.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a communication dated 05.06.2018 (hereafter the impugned order), dis-empaneling the petitioner from security agencies employed by respondent no.1 (Director General Resettlement hereafter DGR). The said punitive measure was taken against the petitioner on the allegation that he had violated Paragraphs 11 and 26 of the Office Memorandum dated 09.07.2012.2. The petitioner superannuated from services with the Indian Armed Forces on 06.10.2012. Thereafter, he commenced the business of providing security services under the name and style of Yogesh Yadav Security Agency. W.P.(C) 7711...
Ramesh Kumar vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~R-89 & 90 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 765/2002 Decided on:-"19th July, 2019 SOHAN LAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Honey Khanna & Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advs. versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sheel Kumar, PS Kalkaji. + CRL.A. 782/2002 RAMESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Honey Khanna & Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advs. versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sheel Kumar, PS Kalkaji. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. The appellants in these appeals were held guilty and convicted by the additional sessions judge, by judgment dated 18.09.2002, and awarded punishment, by order on sentence dated 23.09.2002. The Crl. Appeal Nos 765/2002 & 782/2002 Page 1 of 25 appellants had approached this Court by these appeals presented in October, 2002 feeling aggrieved by the judg...
The Young Mens Christian Association of Ernakulam & Ors. Vs.national C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h May, 2019 Date of Decision:19. h July, 2019 CS(OS) 148/2018, 1892/2019, 665/2019, 16979/2018, 16209/2018 & 4737/2018 I.As. 4312/2019, 2653/2019, 1893/2019, THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ERNAKULAM & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with I. Jose and Miss P.S. (M: Advocates Mr. P. Chandralekha, 9811556966). versus NATIONAL COUNCIL YMCAS OF INDIA ..... Defendant (M:9891234058) Through: Mr. Thomas Joseph Sr. Adv., with with Mr. Puneet Jaiswal, Advocate for D-1. for Defendant no.1 Mr. Ajit Pudussery and Mr. Ajeet Singh Verma, Advocates for D-2 and 3 (M:92058. 3618). Mr. Manu Krishnan, Advocate for D- 4 (M:95995. 6339). Mr. Jayant Mehta and Mr. Koshy John, Advs for D-7 (M:99103. 8534). Mr. Ranjay N., Advocate for I.A.16209/2018. in applicant (M:9871584658) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The dispute in the present suit relates to the various YMCAs of India and...
Jamna Dass vs.akash Drall
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h July, 2019 + CM(M) 1069/2019 JAMNA DASS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Agrawal, Advocate. AKASH DRALL versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CM APPL. 31942/2019(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1069/2019 & CM APPL. 31943/2019 1. The petitioner/defendant is aggrieved by an order dated 12.11.2018 in suit No.CS177392016 by which ADJ-02, (South West), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi has dismissed an application for an amendment of the written statement made under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter, the CPC).2. The suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff was for recovery of the sum of 30,00,000/-. In the original written statement filed by the respondent on 04.08.2011, the defendant inter alia averred as follows:-"CM(M) 1069/2019 Page 1 of 8 5-6 That the contents ...
Jatinder Khurana & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 19, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3446/2019 & CRL.M.A. 31388/2019 JATINDER KHURANA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikram Dua & Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Gaurav Mr. Karan Jain, Advocate with... RESPONDENTS Nos. 2 to 4 in person. + CRL.M.C. 3462/2019 & CRL.M.A. 31440/2019 SHRI ROSHAN LAL AGGARWAL & ORS. Through: Mr. Karan Jain, Advocate. .....Petitioners Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Pooja. Mr. Vikram Dua & Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 3446/2019 & 3462/2019 Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 178/2018 under Sections 308/323/341/5of IPC and FIR No.181/2018 under Sections 323/354/354-B/5of ...
Mehar Singh Loh and Ors vs.airport Authority of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1524/2013 MEHAR SINGH LOH AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kanwar Udai Bhan Singh Sehrawat, Advs. Versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai, Ms. Chetna Rai and Mr. Aman Yadav, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Adv. for Nodal Officer/LAC. Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1907.2019 % IA No.12226/2018 & 12227/2019 (both of plaintiffs for recall of the order dated 23rd May, 2014 and for condonation of 1536 days delay in applying therefor) 1. The counsel for the plaintiff and the counsel for the defendant Airport Authority of India (AAI) have been heard.2. The suit seeks declaration of the plaintiff Ramjas (since substituted by his heirs) as the Bhumidar / owner of property admeasuring 152 sq. yds. in Khasra No.1221 in extended Lal Dora of Village Nangal Dewat, Delhi and a decree for mandatory injunction, direc...
Sukhbir Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 90/2019 Judgment delivered on:19. 07.2019 SUKHBIR KUMAR STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Vinay Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Kamlesh Kumar, P.S.Kalkaji. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 03.12.2018 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning order on conviction dated 03.12.2018 was dismissed.2.... Petitioner was convicted of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced by the Trial Court to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment. The Appellate Court reduced the sentence to two years rigorous imprisonment.3. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant along with her sons had gone to Kalkaji temple and there was heavy rush on account of the festival of Navr...
Jaideep Singh vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 7.2019 + W.P.(C) 5820/2018 M/S DATAR SECURITY SERVICES GROUP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. T.K.Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Garauv Dudeja and Mr. Farhaan S. Haque, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr. Chirag Jain and Ms. Ishan Agarwal, Advocates for respondent- GNCTD + W.P.(C) 6869/2018 JAIDEEP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh and Mr. Mohinder Kumar Madan, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr. Chirag Jain and Ms. Ishan Agarwal, Advocates for respondent- GNCTD + W.P.(C) 1242/2019 WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner W.P.(C).5820/2018 etc. 1 of 17 Through: Mr. Raman Kapoor, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath and Mr. Mahavir Rawat, Advocates versus GTB HOSPITAL AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. ...
Thermax Limited vs.thermax Engineers Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h July, 2019 + CS(COMM) 157/2017 & I.A. 10119/2014 THERMAX LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj & Mr. Bikash Ghorai, Advocates (M-9810147174) versus THERMAX ENGINEERS PVT LTD Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff Thermax Limited has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark and trade name, passing off, etc. in respect of its trade name THERMAX. The case of the Plaintiff is that it had coined and adopted the mark THERMAX in 1974 and the same is being used as a trademark, house mark and is also a distinctive and prominent mark of its corporate name. The changes in the constitution of the company Thermax Ltd, from Thermax India Pvt. Ltd leading up to it becoming a listed company on 9th January, 1995, has been explained in paragraph 4 of the plaint.2. The mark THERMAX is also a registered t...
Vikrant Chopra & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 19, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3453/2019 VIKRANT CHOPRA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhupinder Mehtani and Ms. Komalpreet Kaur Jolly, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Ghanshyam Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.31400/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3453/2019 Quashing of FIR No.106/2017, under Sections 498-A/406/3of IPC, registered at Police Station Crime (Women) Cell Nanak Pura, Delhi is sought on the basis of compromise deed of 28th March, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Ghanshyam on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, pre...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »