Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Puneet Kumar Narula vs.afzal Fakir Shah & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~12 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. 07.2019 + + CM(M) 95/2018 & CM APPL. 2656/2018 CM(M) 1073/2018 & CM APPL. 36835/2018 PUNEET KUMAR NARULA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Arora, Advocate with Ms.Radhika Arora, Advocate versus AFZAL FAKIR SHAH & ANR CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. These two petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arise out of the same suit, being Civil Suit No.148/2015 pending in the Court of the Additional District Judge, District West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. In C.M (M) 95/2018, the petitioner/plaintiff has challenged an order dated 17.10.2017 by which his application under Order I Rule 10 read with Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) for impleadment of three new defendants and consequential amendment in pleadings, was dismissed. This Court issued notice in CM(M) 95/2018 on 22.01.2018 a...
Sohan Lal & Ors. Vs.the State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~R-89 & 90 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 765/2002 Decided on:-"19th July, 2019 SOHAN LAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Honey Khanna & Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advs. versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sheel Kumar, PS Kalkaji. + CRL.A. 782/2002 RAMESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Honey Khanna & Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advs. versus THE STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sheel Kumar, PS Kalkaji. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. The appellants in these appeals were held guilty and convicted by the additional sessions judge, by judgment dated 18.09.2002, and awarded punishment, by order on sentence dated 23.09.2002. The Crl. Appeal Nos 765/2002 & 782/2002 Page 1 of 25 appellants had approached this Court by these appeals presented in October, 2002 feeling aggrieved by the judg...
Principal Commissioner, Central Tax South vs.m/s Jc Decaux Advertismen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 07.2019 SERTA112019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL TAX SOUTH Through: Mr. Sameer Jain, Standing Counsel ..... Appellant versus M/S JC DECAUX ADVERTISMENT INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta & Mr. Balkrishan Sharma, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL.15866/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL.15865/2019 This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 270 days delay in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 270 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. SERTA112019 This appeal has been preferred challenging the order passed by 1. SERTA112019 Page 1 of 2 CESTAT dated 17.04.2018 whereby the order in original passed by the Commissioner dated 17.07.2014 has been qua...
Shyam @ Shyamu & Anr vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER OF: CRL.A. 218/2004 Reserved on:12. 04.2019 Date of decision:19. 07.2019 SHYAM @ SHYAMU & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with SI Vikash Fageria, P.S. Raja Garden. AND CRL.A. 708/2005 GYAN CHAND @ SETHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with SI Vikash Fageria, P.S. Raja Garden STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI CRL.A.218/2004 & 708/2005 Page 1 of 21 HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present appeals are directed against the judgment dated 23.2.2004, passed by the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.64/2002 arising from FIR No.1006/2000, registered at PS Rajouri Garden under Sections 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC), whereunder Shyam @ Shyamu and Ramu (both brothers), appellants in Crl.A. ...
Ambedkar University of Delhi vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6597/2014 and CM APPL. 15694/2014 AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr Hardik Rupal, Mr Prang andMr Koushik Ghosh, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ........ RESPONDENTS % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1907.2019 1. None appears for the respondents.2. It is seen that none had appeared for the respondents on the previous occasions as well. In the circumstances, this Court does not consider it apposite to defer the hearing of the present petition to await the representation on behalf of the respondents.3. The petitioner is a University established by Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and had filed the present petition impugning an order dated 20.08.2014 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no.2 (Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities hereafter the Commissioner).4. The Commissioner had passed ...
Vinay Verma & Ors vs.state of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 19, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3466/2019 & CRL.M.As. 31448-31449/2019 VINAY VERMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta & Mr. Ajit Bhardwaj, Advocates. Versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Kaushik Ghosh. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.275/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediation Report of 24th March, 2018 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Kaushik Ghosh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3466/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits ...
Dayalbagh Educational Institute vs.university Grants Commission & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) No.261/2019 and CM No.28966/2019 Judgment reserved on :01.07.2019 Date of decision :19. 07.2019 DAYALBAGH EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar Sr. Advocate Arora, Mr.Vinay with Mr.VinayakBatta, Advocates. Versus UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ORS...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Mr. Vaibhav Gahlaut, Advocates for R-1 Mr.AnilSoni, Standing Counsel for R-2 None for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Dayalbagh Education Society, a deemed university vide the present petition has sought the quashing of orders dated 5.11.2018 and all actions and procedure adopted by the respondent W.P(C) 261/2019 Page 1 of 82 No.1 vide communications dated 15.11.208 and 16.11.2018 pursuant thereto and also seeks that the respondent No.1, the University Grants Commission be directed to remove the difficulties by virtue of powers conferred under Regulation 21 of the UGC ...
Union of India vs.m/s Mku Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~19 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 07.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 114/2019, I.A.Nos.4114/2019 & 4116/2019 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. versus M/S MKU PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Geeta Sharma, Ms. Priya Singh and Ms. Akshita Sachdeva, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) I.A.No.4116/2019 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the petition. According to the petitioner, there is a delay of 14 days.2. Notice in this application was issued on 19.03.2019. A reply to the application has been filed. Even though objections are taken to condonation of delay, Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, learned senior counsel for the respondent says that since the period of delay is not much and because the court wishes to proceed on the merits of the matter, he has no objection if the court were to condone the delay. Accordingly, delay in ...
Pradeep Khullar vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h July, 2019. + TEST.CAS. 104/2014 & I.A.1551/2015 (u/o VII Rule 11 CPC) PRADEEP KHULLAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A. K. Tewari, Ms. Nistha Gupta and Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocates. (M:9415152494) versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Yashmeet Kaur, Advocate for R (M:9810788943) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. None appears for Respondent No.3 for the last several hearings.2. The Present Test. Case has been filed seeking probate of Will dated 4th May, 1986 and Codicil dated 5th May, 1986 executed by Late Shri Krishan Lal Khullar. The petition has been preferred by Shri Pradeep Khullar, one of the sons of Late Shri Krishan Lal Khullar against his brother - Shri Virendra Khullar (Respondent No.2) and sister - Smt. Neelam Khanna (Respondent No.3). The reliefs sought in the petition are as under: (i) Grant a Probate of the Will dated 04.05.1986 and Codicil dated 05.05...
Manish Kumar Agarwal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 19, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3444/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31385/2019 MANISH KUMAR AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kailash Sharma, Mr. Pankaj Sharma & Mr. Mohit Singh, Advocates with petitioner in person. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Pankaj Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.126/2018, under Sectionsof IPC, registered at Police Station Mangolpuri, New Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement agreement of 9th July, 2019 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Pankaj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by him. CRL.M.C. 3444/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2,...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »