Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Eci-Nayak (Jv) vs.ircon International Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~40 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP(I)(COMM) 223/2019 Date of Decision :22. d July, 2019 ECI-NAYAK (JV) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Mr.Deepak Chaudhary, Advs. versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ANR. Through: Mr.Abir Phukan, Mr.Gaurav ........ RESPONDENTS Jyoti, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration 1. and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) inter- alia praying for the following reliefs: (i) Set Aside/ Quash the order dated 09.07.2019 inter-alia restraining the respondent No.1 from taking any coercive action including levying liquidated damages, usurping security deposit and proceeds of interim payment certificates and /or allied action or otherwise giving effect to show cause 7 days' notice dated 18.06.2019 and consequently, pass ex-parte ad- interim order staying the termination of contract da...
Shashank Bhagat & Anr. Vs.shefali Varma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 07.2019 ARB.P. 737/2017 SHASHANK BHAGAT & ANR. versus SHEFALI VARMA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Varnika Chawla, : Advocates. : Ms Namitha Mathews and Mr Pulkit : Malhotra, Advocates for R- Mr Ashok Chhabra and Mr Nikhil Karwal, : Advocates for R-2 to R-12. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the A&C Act), inter alia, praying that an arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in connection with the Agreement to Develop dated 29.10.2012 (hereafter referred to as the Agreement). The Agreement was executed by respondent no.1 (Ms Shefali Varma) in her individual capacity claiming to be the legal ARB.P. 73...
Kohli One Housing & Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Rockman Projects Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3513/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31626/2019 CRL.M.C. 3514/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31631/2019 CRL.M.C. 3515/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31632/2019 KOHLI ONE HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior ........ Petitioner Advocate, with Mr. Rajinder Singh, Mr. Moinuddin Khan & Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocates. Versus M/S ROCKMAN PROJECTS LTD. M/S ROCKMAN PROJECTS LTD. M/S ROCKMAN BREWERIES (TNK) LTD......... RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned three petitions, petitioner is the complainant who seeks expeditious proceedings in CC Nos. 14984/2017, 14985/2017 and 20479/2016 relating to dishonour of cheques aggregating to 1.5 crores. Since the relief sought in these petitions is an innocuous one, therefore, notice of these petitions to opposite side is dispensed with. Crl.M.C. 3513/2019 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 Learned senior counsel for petitioner s...
Shwetadri Speciality Papers Pvt. Ltd vs.national Research Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d July, 2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 88/2017 SHWETADRI SPECIALITY PAPERS PVT. LTD ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Mr. Vikram Dhokalia and Ms. Saumya Tandon, Advocates (M:98710. 8884) versus NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORP. AND ANR. Through: Mr. J.M. Kalia and Mr. Bhaulana ........ RESPONDENTS Garg, Advocates (M:98103. 5510) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is a Section 34 petition challenging the award dated 29th May, 2006 passed by the ld. Sole Arbitrator. The disputes arise out of a license agreement dated 29th October, 1990 between Shwetadri Speciality Papers Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter Petitioner or Claimant) and the National Research Development Corporation (hereinafter NRDC or Respondent).2. The... Petitioner was interested in obtaining technology for the manufacture of thermographic paper and entered into a license agreement with NRDC for the same. A perusal of the agreeme...
Gaurav Garg vs.aly Morani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
FAO(OS) (COMM) 169/2019 GAURAV GARG Date of Decision:19. 07.2019 ..... Appellant and $~39 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr. Abhishek Malhotra Ms.Shilpa, Advocates. versus ALY MORANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 13.5.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the O.A. filed by the appellant herein, which was filed against the order dated 2.5.2019 passed by the learned Joint Registrar, whereby, the learned Joint Registrar has closed the plaintiffs/appellants evidence and listed the matter for defendants/respondents evidence.2. It is not disputed that the present appeal is not maintainable in view of proviso to Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Court, Act, 2015.3. We have, however...
Mr. Deepak Madan vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 19, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1416/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5655/2019 MR. DEEPAK MADAN Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar & ........ Petitioner Ms. Satakshi Verma, Advocates with petitioner in person. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Rohtash Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.34/2018, under Sectionsof IPC, registered at police station Mayapuri, New Delhi, on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 and trial courts order of 4th February, 2019 (Annexure P-3). Respondent No.2 is the injured who is employed in the factory owned by petitioner and had sustained injuries while performing his duties in petitioners factory. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the accident in question occurred due to sheer negligence of respondent No.2 and he has been Crl.M.C. 1416/2019 ...
Tapan Kumar Deo vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 7707/2019 & CM APPLN. 32020-21/2019 TAPAN KUMAR DEO ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Achintya Dwivedi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Maninder Achharya, ASG with Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the decision of Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) declining the proposal of appointment of the... Petitioner as Presiding Officer in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the DRT") at Aurangabad, as reflected by information submitted by the respondent No.l in this Court on 19.11.2018 by a letter dated 15.11.2018 of respondent No.2 wherein stated that "The appointment Committee has declined the proposal for appointment of... Petitioner to the post of Presiding Officer in Debt Recovery Tribunal, at Aurangaba...
Pradeep Singh Gosain vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"19th July, 2019 Crl.M.C. 1511/2019 PRADEEP SINGH GOSAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Thagal, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State. Mr. Pradeep Chhindra & Mr. Neeraj Kumar Mishra, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies on 08.12.2013. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) No.34/2015 having been registered on 17.01.2015 by police station Swaroop Nagar, on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner) and his mother (second petitioner). Crl. M.C. No.1511/2019 Page 1 of 7 2. The partie...
M/S Bombay Intelligence Security India Ltd vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 13686/2018 and CM Nos. 53357/2018, 53358/2018 & 17151/2019 M/S BOMBAY INTELLIGENCE SECURITY INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Pankaj Kumar, Ms Kanika Pal, Soumya and Ms Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Sarvan Kumar Shukla and Mr Mukesh Kumar Shukla and Kavinder K Gill, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1907.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. as under:-"a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction thereby directing all the respondents to consider and adjust the amount already deposited by the bearing no.20310218450011001 under the new sub-code i.e. bearing No.10310218450011001 w.e.f. 01.10.2011 to 31.05.2013. petitioner sub-code under their b. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction thereby directing all the respondents to W.P.(C) 13...
Ramesh Chander Goyal & Ors. Vs.leo Ispat Ltd & Anr. Leo Ispat Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 19, 2019 + (i) (ii) + (iii) + (iv) + (v) + (vi) + CRL.M.C. 4436/2017 & CRL.M.A. 17772-73/2017 CRL.M.C. 4106/2018 CRL.M.C. 4110/2018 CRL.M.C. 4121/2018 CRL.M.C. 4122/2018 CRL.M.C. 4123/2018 RAMESH CHANDER GOYAL & ORS. Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra & .....Petitioners Ms. Madhu, Advocates Versus LEO ISPAT LTD & ANR. LEO ISPAT LTD. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wani & Mr.Himanshu Garg, Advocates for respondent-LEO ISPAT LTD. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2-State in Crl.M.C. 4436/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In proceedings under Section 138 The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, trial court vide impugned order of 26th October, 2017 has declined petitioners application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to cross-examine complainant (CW-1) regarding purported contradictions in collateral proceedings. Crl.M.C. 4436/2017 & connected petitions Page 1 of 3 With the consent o...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »