Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mizul Singh vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3479/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31513-14/2019 MIZUL SINGH Through: Mr. Anuj Saini & Mr. Praveen ........ Petitioner Kumar, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Naveen Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.83/2013, under Sections 498A/406/ 343/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Vikas Puri, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 15th July, 2019 of second respondent.... Petitioners counsel has handed over certified copy of the joint statement of parties recorded on 15th July, 2019 by the matrimonial court wherein terms of settlement have been recorded. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she ...
Alok Gupta & Ors vs.state of Nct Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :22. d July, 2019 + LPA4462019 and CM Nos. 31116-31117/2019 ALOK GUPTA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Nikhil Malhotra and Mr. Vinod Malhotra, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Saumya Tandon, Adv. for R-1, 3 and 5 Ms. Mansi Gupta, SC for R-4/North MCD Mr. B. Mohapatra, Adv. for R-6 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.31117/2019 (condonation of delay) 1. This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal.2. Having heard learned Counsels for both sides and looking to the reasons given in the application, there are reasonable reasons for LPA4462019 Page 1 of 3 condoning the delay. We, therefore, condone the delay in filing the appeal.3. The application is allowed and disposed of. CM No.31116/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to ...
Prem Bahadur @ Bhoj Bahadur vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 888/2017 PREM BAHADUR @ BHOJ BAHADUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI Narander Pal Singh, PS GTB Enclave CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT2207.2019 The appellant Prem Bahadur @ Bhoj Bahadur stands convicted, by judgment dated 29th July, 2017, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(i) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the POCSO Act). Resultantly, vide order dated 31st July, 2017, he also stands sentenced to (i) 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI), for the offences punishable under Section 366, IPC, with fine of Rs. 15,000/- and default sentence o...
Kohli One Housing & Development Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Rockman Breweries (Tn ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3513/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31626/2019 CRL.M.C. 3514/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31631/2019 CRL.M.C. 3515/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31632/2019 KOHLI ONE HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior ........ Petitioner Advocate, with Mr. Rajinder Singh, Mr. Moinuddin Khan & Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocates. Versus M/S ROCKMAN PROJECTS LTD. M/S ROCKMAN PROJECTS LTD. M/S ROCKMAN BREWERIES (TNK) LTD......... RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned three petitions, petitioner is the complainant who seeks expeditious proceedings in CC Nos. 14984/2017, 14985/2017 and 20479/2016 relating to dishonour of cheques aggregating to 1.5 crores. Since the relief sought in these petitions is an innocuous one, therefore, notice of these petitions to opposite side is dispensed with. Crl.M.C. 3513/2019 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 Learned senior counsel for petitioner s...
M/S Naveen Vidya Bharti Public Higher Secondary School Thr Its Directo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~28 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11075/2016 & CM Appln. 43300/2016 M/S NAVEEN VIDYA BHARTI PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL THR ITS DIRECTOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mishra Mr.Mithilesh Advocates Kumar and Jaiswal, 1. versus THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHOPAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Keshav Mohan, Mr.Rishi K. and Mr.Piyush Vatsa, Awasthi Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the order dated 22nd November, 2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal whereby the petitioners appeal was dismissed.2. The petitioner School was covered under the ambit of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act) with effect from January, 2010.3. The Enforcement Officer of the respondent inspected the records of the petitioner for the period 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 and recommended W.P.(C) 11075/2016 Page 1 of ...
Amit vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 07.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1420/2019 AMIT STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Gurtinder Singh Gujral with Mr. Vinod Mangal, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Amolak, PS Swaroop Nagar. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.728/2015 under Sections 186/353/3IPC and Sections 27/Arms Act, Police Station Swaroop Nagar. Subsequently, Section 427 IPC was added.2. Allegations in the FIR are that information was received that some accused wanted in another case were seen in Swaroop Nagar. A trap was laid. It is alleged that the accused persons came in a car and when they were sought to be apprehended, they tried to flee from the spot and also fired shot at the police party. BAIL APPLN. 1420/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel f...
Rohit Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3500/2019 ROHIT SHARMA Date of Order: July 22, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lakshendrya Kumar, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Ayush Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.853/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 13th December, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ayush Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 3500/2019 Page 1 of 3 between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of mediate...
Tomorrowland Technologies Exports Limited vs.mercantile Ventures Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 07.2019 EX.P. 177/2015 TOMORROWLAND TECHNOLOGIES EXPORTS LIMITED ..... Decree Holder Through : Mr. Pavan Sachdeva and Mr. Ishan Sachdeva, Advs. versus MERCANTILE VENTURES LTD. ..... Judgement Debtor Through : Mr. R.V. Prabhat, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) This is a petition which seeks execution of an ex-parte award dated 1. 23.05.2012. The reply and rejoinder have been filed in the execution petition.2. Mr. Pavan Sachdeva, learned counsel for the decree holder, has argued for enforcement of the award on behalf of the decree holder while Mr. R.V. Prabhat appears for the judgment debtor.3. What has emerged from the record is that the decree holder had entered into an underwriting agreement dated 10.01.1995 with the earlier avatar of the judgment debtor. The earlier avatar of the judgment debtor went by the name Foresight Financial Services Ltd. (FFSL). On account of the disp...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs.indian Sugar Exim Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA14432018 % PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing versus ..... Appellant counsel ..... Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr.Rohit Kumar Gupta & Ms. Monika Ghai, Advocates INDIAN SUGAR EXIM CORPORATION LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER2207.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 16th April, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.3860/Del/2017 & SA No.85/Del/2018 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2009- 2010 whereby the ITAT deleted the penalty imposed on the Respondent Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) on the basis that it was done after the expiry of the limitation period under Section 275(1)(a) of the Act.2. The facts in brief are that the Assessee filed its return on 30th September, 2009 for AY20092010. The assessment order was passed by the Assessing ITA14432018 Page 1...
Irshad & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3503/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31594/2019 IRSHAD & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.N.Dubey, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI K.P.Singh. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.183/2017, under Sections 323/354/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Nand Nagri, New Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the court, is the first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI K.P.Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2 present in the Court, affirms the contents of her affidavit of 18th...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »