Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Corsan Corviam Construccion s.a.- Sadhbhav Engineering Ltd. Jv vs.comm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~28 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12876/2018 CORSAN CORVIAM CONSTRUCCION S.A.- SADHBHAV ENGINEERING LTD. JV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari and Mr. Ramashish, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2207.2019 1. A short issue is involved in this petition regarding the obligation of the Respondent to pay interest on the refund issued to the... Petitioner by an order dated 20th August, 2017.2. The admitted facts, as evident from the order granting refund, are that the... Petitioner, a registered dealer under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act), filed a return claiming refund on 10th July, 2015. The tax period for which refund was claimed was the fourth quarter of 2014. The refund claimed was Rs.2,56,57,120/- and refund allowed was Rs.1,30,96,335/- Afte...
Praveen & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3480/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31518/2019 PRAVEEN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar & Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Ranvir Singh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.97/2015, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 5th September, 2018 and affidavit of 2nd May, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Ranvir Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submi...
Gaurav Aggarwal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: May 23, 2019 Decided on: July 22, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4055/2016 GAURAV AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gupta, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Mohd. Kafeel, PS Mukherjee Nagar. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Advocate along with Mr. R.K. Tiwari and Mr. G.K. Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 The petitioner herein was brought before the court of Metropolitan Magistrate to face trial as an accused on the basis of report (charge sheet) under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), presented on 03.07.2002, upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.560/2001 of Police Station Mukherjee Nagar on allegations of his involvement in certain acts of commission and omission constituting offences punishable under sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal Co...
Nazimuddin & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 22, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3494/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31571/2019 NAZIMUDDIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.N.Dubey, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Akhilesh Sharma Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.145/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act,1961 registered at Police Station Welcome, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 6th September, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Akhilesh Sharma on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 3494/2019 Page ...
Chuckles Kohli & Ors vs.ravinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~42 & 5 * + Date of Decision:22. 7.2019 % FAO(OS) 129/2019 CHUCKLES KOHLI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate. % versus RAVINDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh with Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Advs. FAO(OS) 88/2019 CHUCKLES KOHLI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate. versus RAVINDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh with Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C.) No.129/2019 & 88/2019 Page 1 of 11 CAV7212019 Learned counsel for the respondent/caveator has appeared. Caveat accordingly stands discharged. CM APPL. 32401/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL.32402/2019 Issue notice. Counsel for the respondent/caveator accepts notice. He fairly does not oppos...
M/S Blue Bird Pure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~70 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3798/2019 M/S BLUE BIRD PURE PVT. LTD. Through: Mrs. Anjali J.Manish and ........ Petitioner versus Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Dabas and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocates for Respondent No.1 Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate Mr. Satyakam, ASC, Govt. Of NCT of Delhi/ Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER2207.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the... RESPONDENTS.2. Counter-affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is already on record.3. The... Petitioner is a company having its registered office in New Delhi, engaged in the manufacturing and trading of water purifiers. It is duly W.P.(C) 3798/2019 Page 1 of 7 registered with the Excise Department and under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Rules un...
Ayesha @ Asha & Ors vs.hirawati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d July, 2019 + CM(M) 530/2018 AYESHA @ ASHA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Renu Verma, Advocate alongwith Petitoner in Person. versus HIRAWATI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Smita Maan & Mr.Vishal Maan, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged an order dated 27.03.2018 passed by the ADJ-03 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in CS No.7240/2016, by which the petitioners/defendants application under Order VII Rule 11 (c) and (d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [CPC]. has been rejected. It is the contention of the petitioners/defendants that the plaintiff failed to make good the deficient court fee, despite opportunity being granted for the purpose, and the plaint, therefore, ought to have been rejected.2. The suit is between members of a family. It was instituted in the year 2009, originally in ...
Ssay & Associates vs.institute of Chartered Accountants of India Throu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7674/2019 & CM No.31881/2019 SSAY & ASSOCIATES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Siddharth Garg, Advocate. versus INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU Through ORDER2207.2019 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 02.02.2019 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Board of Discipline of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (hereafter ICAI). By the impugned order, the Board of Discipline (hereafter the Board) has found respondent no.3 (M/s KNA Associates hereafter KNA) not guilty of professional misconduct within the meaning of Clause (8) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Accordingly, the Board has closed the case instituted at the instance of the petitioner. The petitioner (earlier known as Vinod Sanjeev Bindal & Co.) 2. is a firm of Chart...
Sarla Gupta & Anr vs.directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 22, 2019 % W.P.(CRL.) 1319/2019 and CRL.M.A. 9696-9697/2019 SARLA GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advocate with Mr.Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Randeep Sachdeva and Mr.Kunal Dutt, Advocates. + W.P.(CRL) 1164/2019 and CRL.M.A. 8513-8514/2019, 10070/2019 VIJAY PAL TRIPATHI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Pavan Narang, Advocate with Mr.Siddharth Handa, Mr. Himanshu Sethi and Mr. Ketan Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Randeep Sachdeva and Mr.Kunal Dutt, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.CRL.M.A. 9697/2019 in W.P.(CRL.) 1319/2019 CRL.M.A. 8514/2019 in W.P.(CRL.) 1164/2019 Exemptions allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(CRL.) 1319/2019 & 1164/2019 Page 1 of 7 CRL.M.A. 10070/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 116...
Ramwati vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2019
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 07.2019 CRL.REV.P. 316/2019 RAMWATI ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saini, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. SI Vinod Bhati, PS Kalkaji. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 316/2019 & Crl.M.A.10202/2019 (for release after admonition or on probation) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 07.12.2018, whereby, appeal of the petitioner, impugning order of conviction dated 01.09.2018 and order on sentence dated 11.09.2018, has been dismissed.2.... Petitioner has been convicted for an offence under Sections 3IPC and Sections 3IPC and sentenced to undergo 2 Crl.Rev.P. 316/2019 Page 1 of 5 years rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Sections 3IPC and 3 years rigorous imprisonment for the offence unde...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »