Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hari Chand Aggarwal (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.m/s Gobind Pershad Jagdish P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 07.2019 CM(M) 1092/2019 & CM APPL. 32935-32936/2019 HARI CHAND AGGARWAL (DECEASED) THR LRS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Kr. Chaudhary, Advocate with Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate. versus M/S GOBIND PERSHAD JAGDISH PARSHAD & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against an order dated 18.04.2019 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, New Delhi in RCT No.147/2016 and order dated 11.08.2015 passed by the Rent Controller in Eviction Petition No.11/2009. By the order dated 11.08.2015, the Trial Court dismissed the application of the petitioner herein under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) for amendment of the written statement filed by him. By the impugned order dated 18.04.2019, the Appellate Co...
Dr. Mayank Sharma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~46 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6479/2016 DR. OJASVI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 9132/2016 SHRUTI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G. Tushar Rao, Advocate Singh, for R-1/UOI. Mr Vikas Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. W.P.(C) 6479/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 25 WITH + W.P.(C) 8170/2017 and CM No.33568/2017 MANI...
Ivrcl-Tantia (Jv) vs.m/s Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Dev ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~R-49 & 50 * + + O.M.P. 1164/2012 O.M.P. 1225/2012 Date of Decision :23. d July, 2019 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD .....Petitioner Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms.Nikita Salwan and Mr.Ayush Srivastava, Advs. versus IVRCL-TANTIA (JV)-G-1 AND ORS. Through None ........ RESPONDENTS IVRCL-TANTIA (JV) M/S DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through None versus ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms.Nikita Salwan and Mr.Ayush Srivastava, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) These petitions have been filed by the parties to the arbitration 1. proceedings challenging the Arbitral Award dated 17.08.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the contract dated 19.02.2001, for execution of certain civil works in Sector V, Udyog Vihar, Bawana, Delhi awarded by the Delhi State ...
Paramdeep vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 656/2019 Judgment delivered on:23. 07.2019 PARAMDEEP ........ Petitioner STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Rahul, SI Savita, P.S.Connaught Place CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.02/2018 under Sections 366/376/109 of the IPC read with Section 6 POCSO, Police Station Connaught Place.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix claimed to be aged 17 years and 10 months. It is alleged that she did not like to study so she left her home on 04.01.2018 and thereafter did not return and was staying in Bangla Sahib Gurudwara.3. It is alleged that at about 9 PM on 05.01.2018 after eating langar she was roaming around on the street opposite Bangla Sahib Gurudwar...
Shruti Jain vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~46 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6479/2016 DR. OJASVI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 9132/2016 SHRUTI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G. Tushar Rao, Advocate Singh, for R-1/UOI. Mr Vikas Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. W.P.(C) 6479/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 25 WITH + W.P.(C) 8170/2017 and CM No.33568/2017 MANI...
Mahesh Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 23, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3522/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31688/2019 MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raveen K. Kashyap, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State wth ASI Rajbir Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.284/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Burari, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 11th March, 2019 (Annexure- C) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3522/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the p...
Mohd. Talib & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~92 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2239/2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Bahar U.Barqi, Advocate DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Piyo Harold and Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advocates for Respondent/DDA Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. versus MOHD. TALIB & ANR CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER2307.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayer in the present petition read as under: (a) Quash the proceedings allegedly resulted into Award No.19/92-93 in respect of their properties/plot measuring 300 square yards bearing No.S-4and measuring 350 square yards bearing No.S-4fallen in Khasra Nos. 419/260,and 420/260, Village: Jogabai, New Delhi. 2. There are two... Petitioners in this Petition, Mohd. Talib (Petitioner No.1) and Zareef Khan (Petitioner No.2). It is stated that Mohd. Talib purchased the property measuring 300 square yards at Plot No.S-4located on Khasra No.420/260 a...
Ravneet Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"23rd July, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 628/2019 RAVNEET SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kaushal Chauhan, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State Mr. Mahesh Khanna, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Sikh rites and ceremonies on 23.01.2015. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.1307/2015 having been registered on 19.09.2015 by police station Hari Nagar on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his father (second petitioner), his mother (third petitioner), his uncle (fourth petitioner), and wife of the said...
Dr. Harnoor Singh Pruthi vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~46 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6479/2016 DR. OJASVI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 9132/2016 SHRUTI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G. Tushar Rao, Advocate Singh, for R-1/UOI. Mr Vikas Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. W.P.(C) 6479/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 25 WITH + W.P.(C) 8170/2017 and CM No.33568/2017 MANI...
Dr. Apram Dua & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3538/2019 Date of Order: July 23, 2019 .....Petitioners DR. APRAM DUA & ORS Through: Mr. Mayank Sawhney, Advocate Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Badlu Ram Ms. Kanika Sawhney, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.178/2018, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Janakpuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 19th September, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Badlu Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved as today, she has recei...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »