Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Ankit Middha & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~46 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6479/2016 DR. OJASVI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 9132/2016 SHRUTI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G. Tushar Rao, Advocate Singh, for R-1/UOI. Mr Vikas Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. W.P.(C) 6479/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 25 WITH + W.P.(C) 8170/2017 and CM No.33568/2017 MANI...
Geeta Rathor & Ors. Vs.the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 07.2019 MAC.APP. 506/2019 & CM No.19902/2019 GEETA RATHOR & ORS. Through: Mr. R. K. Sonkiya, Advocate. ..... Appellants Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for Respondent No.1. ........ RESPONDENTS $~2 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM No.19902/2019 (for delay) 1. The delay of 236 days in filing the appeal is stated to be explained on the ground that the certified copies which the appellants had obtained were misplaced; hence, the entire exercise had to be undertaken all over again. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellant no.1 is an illiterate person and is not well-versed with the process of Courts.2. In view of the above and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 506/2019 3. Issue notice. MAC.APP. No.506-2019 Page 1 of 7 4. Mr. Pradeep Gaur, the...
Rasmala Trade Finance Fund vs.raman Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on :22. d April, 2019 Date of decision :23. d July, 2019 CS (COMM) 896/2018 RASMALA TRADE FINANCE FUND ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Jha, Mr. Raghav Sabharwal & Ms. Niti A. Sacchar, Advocates (M-9818844415) versus RAMAN GUPTA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anup Kumar D. Sayare, Mr. Anil Upadhyay, Advocates along with Defendant (M- 9811192007) person. in CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT I.As.8652/2018 (u/O XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) & 13231/2018 (for leave to defend) 1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC praying for decree for a sum of USD14025,783 along with past due profit and late payment charges @ 2% for each days delay. One M/s Met Trade (UAE) FZC (hereinafter Met Trade) had availed of a Murabaha Facility Agreement (hereinafter, Murabaha Facility) with the Plaintiff on 2nd May, 2016. As per the said agreement, the Plaintiff had given a f...
Dr. Gurwinder Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~46 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6479/2016 DR. OJASVI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 9132/2016 SHRUTI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G. Tushar Rao, Advocate Singh, for R-1/UOI. Mr Vikas Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. W.P.(C) 6479/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 25 WITH + W.P.(C) 8170/2017 and CM No.33568/2017 MANI...
Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd vs.ivrcl-tantia (Jv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~R-49 & 50 * + + O.M.P. 1164/2012 O.M.P. 1225/2012 Date of Decision :23. d July, 2019 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD .....Petitioner Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms.Nikita Salwan and Mr.Ayush Srivastava, Advs. versus IVRCL-TANTIA (JV)-G-1 AND ORS. Through None ........ RESPONDENTS IVRCL-TANTIA (JV) M/S DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through None versus ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Anusuya Salwan, Ms.Nikita Salwan and Mr.Ayush Srivastava, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) These petitions have been filed by the parties to the arbitration 1. proceedings challenging the Arbitral Award dated 17.08.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the contract dated 19.02.2001, for execution of certain civil works in Sector V, Udyog Vihar, Bawana, Delhi awarded by the Delhi State ...
Seema Tiwari vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~4 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA312018 & CM APPL. 2773/2018 SEEMA TIWARI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Ms. Ritu Puri, Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms. Shivani Jij, Advocates. Mr. P.K. Mishra, LA Officer (DITDC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by a common order dated ORDER2307.2019 04.12.2017, passed by the learned Single Judge, disposing of two writ petitions filed by her.2. The first writ petition was filed by the appellant/petitioner along with three other namely Anita Aghi, Sudesh Kumar Arroa and Mukesh Singh on 21.07.2016 and was registered as W.P.(C) No.6335/16. The reliefs prayed for in the said petition were as follows : - a. issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing the letters dated 18th July 2016 and 19th July 2016 issued by re...
Sh. Hukm Tejpratap Singh and Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 9441/2018 SH. HUKM TEJPRATAP SINGH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms Mahima Rathi and Ms Mamta, Advocates. : Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr Chirayu Jain and Mr Ishan Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petition impugning the Card (No.225215) issued to petitioner no.1 under Delhi Government Employees Health Scheme (hereafter DGEHS card), denying his request to include the names of petitioner nos. 2 and 3 as beneficiaries under the said Scheme.2. The said request was denied on the ground that petitioners nos. 2 and 3 do not fall under the definition of family as per the Delhi Government Employees Health Scheme (hereafter DGEHS or the Scheme). W.P.(C) 9441/2018 Pag...
Jai Singh Joon & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9238/2014 JAI SINGH JOON & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana and Ms Akshita Chhatwal, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. Mr Arun Birbal and Mr Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. Mr Parvinder Chauhan and Mr Nitin Jain, Advocates for DUSIB. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER2307.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The prayers in the present petition read as under: a) issue a writ, order or declaration declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings i.e. Section 4 notification dated 30.7.1998, Section 6 declaration is dated 4.8.1998 and the award No.18/2000-2001 announced on 12.3.2001 in respect of the... Petitioners land comprised in Khasra nos. 1/1, 1/2, 2 and 5 admeasuring 9 bigha, situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Bhalswa Jahangirpuri, Delhi have lapsed in view of sub...
Dr. Kushagra Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~46 to 53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6479/2016 DR. OJASVI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. WITH + W.P.(C) 9132/2016 SHRUTI JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sanat Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr Virendra Rawat, Mr Vinayak Batta and Mr Sahil, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr G. Tushar Rao, Advocate Singh, for R-1/UOI. Mr Vikas Senior Advocate with Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthansangi Das, Ms Puja Sarkar, Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Arunima Pal and Mr Abhijit Chakraborty, Advocates for R- 2/MCI. W.P.(C) 6479/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 25 WITH + W.P.(C) 8170/2017 and CM No.33568/2017 MANI...
Vijender Kumar Yadav @ Bijender Singh & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~19 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"23rd July, 2019 Crl.M.C. 1578/2019 VIJENDER KUMAR YADAV @ BIJENDER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Nand Kishor, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Tej Ram, PS Najafgarh. Ms. Archana Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies on 16.01.2013. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.384/2015 having been registered on 11.05.2015 by police station Najafgarh on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner) and his brother (second petitioner). On con...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »