Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vishal Kumar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1214/2019 Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2019 VISHAL KUMAR THE STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Mukesh Singh, Adv. Mr.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.416/2018 under Sections 3of the IPC, Police Station Bhalswa Dairy.2. The allegations are that the victim was fighting with a co accused and thereafter it is alleged that petitioner and another co accused Sadhu Singh came on the spot and intervened. It is alleged that all three of them started beating the victim.3. Thereafter it is alleged that petitioner and the co accused Sadhu Singh held the victim and instigated the main accused, who stabbed the victim. BAIL APPLN. 1214/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical r...
M/S Satyadhara Communications Pvt. Ltd vs.m/s Indiasign Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 208/2018 Date of Decision :24. h July, 2019 M/S SATYADHARA COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abid Ali Beeran, Mr.P.M. Mr.Sarath and Haneef Janardhanan, Advs. versus M/S INDIASIGN PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Gaurav Kejriwal and Mr.Sujit Keshri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 08.04.2016 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement dated NIL executed between the parties whereby the respondent had granted the use of its Teleport services on "INTELSAT, IS-17 Satellite" to the petitioner. OMP(COMM) No.208/2018 Page 1 2. The disputes between the parties arose out of alleged non- payment of the charges ...
Sanwar Mal & Ors. Vs.new India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS versus SANWAR MAL & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) $~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2019 MAC.APP. 1045/2018 Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. ..... Appellants The appellants impugn the award of compensation on the ground that it is on the lesser side. It is the appellants case that the deceased was earning Rs. 16,000/- per month as a Physical Education Teacher in a school and had produced a salary certificate in this regard. Upon examination of the said salary certificate (Exhibit PW-4), the learned Tribunal had found that the salary of Rs. 16,000/- included Rs.6,000/- for extra classes. In fact, the salary was only Rs. 10,000/- which was taken into consideration and on it 30% was added towards loss of future prospects. The learned Tribunal while considering the above issue held inter-alia as under:-"As...
Kulachi Hansraj Model School & Ors vs.neena Jajodia & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~9 to 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 07.2019 * + W.P.(C) 8141/2017 & CM APPL. 33486/2017 KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Naniwal, Adv. versus YASHU SAYAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Prateek K. Chadha, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Anuj Aggarwal & Mr.Kumar Utkarsh, Advs. for R-1. Mr.K.P. Tevathia, LA for DoE. + W.P.(C) 8155/2017 & CM APPL. 33510/2017 KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Naniwal, Adv. versus KIRTI JAIN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Atul Jain, Adv. with Mr.Jatin + W.P.(C) 8171/2017 & CM APPL. 33569/2017 Goel, Adv. for R-1. Mr.K.P. Tevathia, LA for DoE. Ms.Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-2. KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Naniwal, Adv. W.P.(C) 8141/2017, 8155/2017 & 8171/2017 Page 1 of 15 versus NEENA JAJODIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Anuj Aggarwal ...
Rajender Kumar @ Bharat & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3562/2019 & CRL.M.A. 31822/2019 RAJENDER KUMAR @ BHARAT & ORS. Through: Mr. Moshin Qureshi, Advocate. .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Krishan Pal. Mr. Abbas Khan, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.260/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, & Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Seelampur, District North East, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement deed of 25th July, 2018 (Annexure P-4) and affidavit of 22nd July, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Krishan Pal on the basis of identity pr...
Santosh Kumar & Anr. Vs.raj Kumar Karmakar & Anr. (National Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. 07.2019 + MAC.APP. 101/2018, CM APPL. 3173/2018, CM APPL. 3175/2018 & CM APPL. 3176/2018 SANTOSH KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate. versus RAJ KUMAR KARMAKAR & ANR(NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.) Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The order of 29.01.2018, directing the appellants to deposit the awarded amount, has been complied with partly i.e. only Rs. 2 lacs has been deposited on 04.08.2018. The stay of the execution of the Award was conditional i.e. only upon deposit of the entire awarded amount, would there be a stay of the impugned order.2. It is the appellants case that the impugned order granting right of recovery to the respondent/insurer is erroneous because the driver of the offending vehicle was holding merely a Learners Licence and another person who holding a valid Drivin...
Kulachi Hansraj Model School & Ors vs.yashu Sayal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~9 to 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 07.2019 * + W.P.(C) 8141/2017 & CM APPL. 33486/2017 KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Naniwal, Adv. versus YASHU SAYAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Prateek K. Chadha, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Anuj Aggarwal & Mr.Kumar Utkarsh, Advs. for R-1. Mr.K.P. Tevathia, LA for DoE. + W.P.(C) 8155/2017 & CM APPL. 33510/2017 KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Naniwal, Adv. versus KIRTI JAIN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Atul Jain, Adv. with Mr.Jatin + W.P.(C) 8171/2017 & CM APPL. 33569/2017 Goel, Adv. for R-1. Mr.K.P. Tevathia, LA for DoE. Ms.Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-2. KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Himanshu Naniwal, Adv. W.P.(C) 8141/2017, 8155/2017 & 8171/2017 Page 1 of 15 versus NEENA JAJODIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Anuj Aggarwal ...
Col Devinder Kumar Sehrawat Anil Kumar Bajpai vs. The Speaker Legislat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~47 & 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision :24. h July, 2019 LPA4502019 & CM APPL. 31445-31447/2019 LPA4522019 & CM APPL. 31544-31546/2019 COL DEVINDER KUMAR SEHRAWAT ANIL KUMAR BAJPAI ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Purushaindra Kaurav, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Piyush Beriwal, Mukharji, Mr.Shoumendu Mr.Satya Swain, Ms.Anuradha Mishra, Mr.Vijay Joshi, Mr.Sushil Kumar Pandey, Mr.Himanshu Pathak , Mr.Amit Gupta and Mr.Sahaj Garg, Advs. Ranjan versus THE SPEAKER LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. for R-1 with Mr.Sameer Vashisht, ASC in item-47 Mr.Sameer Vashisht, ASC for R-1 with Mr.Manish Vashisht, Ms. Manashwy Jha and Ms. Urvi Kapoor, Advs. in item-48 + + CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) ORDER2407.2019 1. These two Letters Patent Appeals have been preferred LPA4502019 & LPA4522019 Page 1 of 8 challenging an order/judgment passed b...
Vaibhav Bajaj vs.sri Guru Gobind Singh College of Commerece and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:23. d July, 2019 + W.P. (C) 9740/2018 & CM APPL. 37948/2018 % 1. VAIBHAV BAJAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajan Mani, Adv. versus SRI GURU GOBIND SINGH COLLEGE OF COMMERECE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A. P. S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit Bangwal, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Bibin Kurian, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The petitioner, Mr. Vaibhav Bajaj, suffers from a Specific Learning Disability in the area of reading, comprehension, spelling and writing skills and mathematics, known, alternatively, as dyslexia. The summary of findings as well as the recommendations, consequent to the assessment by the Institute of Child Development and Adolescent Health, Moolchand Medicity, as contained in the report issued by the said Institute, read thus: W.P. (C) ...
Vijay Building Apartment Owners Association vs.ardee Housing Pvt Ltd & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d May, 2019 Date of Decision:23. d July, 2019 + CS (OS) 1261/2015 VIJAY BUILDING APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate versus with Mr. Rama Shankar, Advocates (M. No.9811214465) ARDEE HOUSING PVT LTD & ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr. T. K. Ganju, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B. Shekhar, Advocate (M. No.8010056536) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.IA Nos. 9496/2015 (Stay) and 1196/2019 (for clarification of order dated 18.12.2018) 1. The present suit is in respect of VIJAYA Building, 17, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 (hereinafter building). The Plaintiff VIJAYA Building Apartment Owners Association (hereinafter Association), is an association formed by various apartment/flat owners of the building. The Association was registered on 9th November, 2012. It has filed the present suit against M/s. Ardee Housing Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter Ardee) and M/s. Gu...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »