Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Toasha Agencies and Anr vs.siddhant Choudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h July, 2019. CS(COMM) 1441/2016 TOASHA AGENCIES AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. V.K. Puri, Mr. Amit and Mr. Gajender Singh, Advs. Versus SIDDHANT CHOUDHARY ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Samar Singh Kushwaha, Mr. Raghavendra M. Bajaj and Ms. Shivangi Nanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.5394/2019 (of plaintiffs u/O VI R-17 CPC) 1. The counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs does not know anything about this application.2. The counsel for the defendant states that this application is infructuous in view of the order dated 5th April, 2019. In terms of the order dated 5th April, 2019, the application is disposed 3. of. IA No.13185/2016 (of plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) 1. The plaintiffs have sued for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from passing off his business as that of the plaintiffs, pleading (i) that the plaintiff No.1 Toasha Agencies is a sole proprietorship of Vishal Garg...
Union of India & Ors vs.parulben Kishore Mansatar and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~28 * + Date of Decision:24. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8843/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC. Versus PARULBEN KISHORE MANSATAR AND ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. M.S.Rao, proxy counsel for Mr. Vijay Verma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Union of India has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 25.1.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in O.A.No.198/2015. The Tribunal has allowed the Original Application preferred by the respondents, and directed the respondents i.e. petitioners herein to permit the applicant to withdraw his resignation by exercising the power vested in the Government under Rule 38 of the CCS(Pension) Rules.2. The brief background facts of the case are that the respondent No.2 was serving as a Sepoy Grade D in the Department of Customs and Ce...
Shriram Gic Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.subh Laxmi Devi @ Shuv Lakshmi Devi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14 to 16 * % + MAC.APP. 1139/2018, CAV11922018, CM APPL. 53507/2018 Decided on:24. 07.2019 & CM APPL. 10196/2019 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus + MAC.APP. 1140/2018, CM APPL. 53473/2018 & CM APPL. ANILA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS 10195/2019 SHRIRAM GIC INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus + MAC.APP. 1141/2018, CM APPL. 53475/2018 & CM APPL. REKHA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS 10188/2019 SHRIRAM GIC INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus SUBH LAXMI DEVI @ SHUV LAKSHMI DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Aatreya Singh, Advocate for R-1 to R-4 in MAC.APP. 1139/2018 and MAC.APP. Nos. 1139, 1140 & 1141/2018 Page 1 of 9 for R-1 to R-5 in MAC.APP. 1140- 41/2018. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that two new wheelchairs each have been supplied to the Medical Superintendent/Director of th...
Avtar Singh vs.nasim Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~11 & 12 * % + MAC.APP. 1042/2018 & CM APPL. 48854/2018 Decided on:24. 07.2019 AVTAR SINGH NASIM AHMED + MAC.APP. 1043/2018 & CM APPL. 48870/2018 versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus AVTAR SINGH SAEEDA BEGUM & ORS ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.S. Sharma, Advocate for appellant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns an award of compensation dated 12.07.2018 in claim petition numbered as MACT No.3574& 357406/16. The facts of the case are that on 18.04.2010, at about 9:30 p.m, a Tavera car, bearing Registration No.HR-67-3645, struck a motor-cycle bearing No.PB-11-AB- 0752, on which three persons were riding. They all suffered injuries, one Rashid Ahmed succumbed to injuries on 19.04.2010, the other two injured persons survived. An FIR bearing No.89/2010 was registered at Police Station, Civil Lines, Punjab for offences punishable under sections 279, 337, MAC.APP. Nos. 1...
Anil Kumar vs.government of Nctd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~64 * + Date of Decision:24. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.7952/2019 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate with Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Shiven Khurrana, Ms. Aayushi, & Mr. Sarmas, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD (Services) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) CM No.329Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.791. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels for the parties, perused the record, and we proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself.2. The petitioner has filed the present writ of certiorari, inter alia, W.P.(C.) No.7952/2019 Page 1 of 15 with the following prayers : To set aside the order dated 02.11.2018 passed in O.A. No.1154/...
Mr. Ravinder Singh Verma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1148/2019 Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2019 MR. RAVINDER SINGH VERMA STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : : For the Respondent Mr.Pramod Kr.Sharma, Adv. Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Nirmala, P.S.Sagarpur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.366/2018 under Sections 354A of the IPC read with Section 8 POCSO, Police Station Sagar Pur. Subsequently, consequent to a supplementary statement Section 10 POCSO has been added.2. The allegation as per the FIR is that the child victim used to go for tuition classes and on the way she would cross the shop which the petitioner is alleged to be running.3. It is alleged that on the day of the incident he called her into the shop and is alleged to have hit her hand on her chest and also touched his mouth on h...
Indeen Bio Power Limited vs.m/s. Efs Facilities Service (India) Pvt. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 28.11.2018 Judgment Pronounced on 24.07.2019 ARB.A. (COMM.) No.39/2016 & I.A.No.14153/2016 INDEEN BIO POWER LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Hiroo Advani with Mr. Shashank and Garg, Mr. Tariq Khan, Mr.Dbeojyoti Sengupta, Advocates. versus M/S. EFS FACILITIES SERVICE (INDIA) PVT. LTD... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vasanth Rajasekaran, Mr.Sukrit Seth and Mr. Saurabh Babulkar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J: Preface 1. This appeal preferred under section 37 the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short '1996 Act') is directed against the order dated 15.09.2016, passed by the arbitral tribunal. The arbitral tribunal via the impugned order has held for the reasons given therein that it has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the disputes obtaining between the parties.2. It would be relevant to note that the constitution of the arbitral tribunal...
Sumit Kamra & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3554/2019 & Crl.M.A. 31782/2019 SUMIT KAMRA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranvir Vats, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Pukhraj. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.877/2016, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 7th July, 2017 and affidavit of 10th July, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pukhraj on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.A. 3554/2019 Page 1 of 3 bet...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.anita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
versus ANITA & ORS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mehtab Singh, Adv. for R -1 to 5. $~9 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. 07.2019 + MAC.APP. 436/2018 & CM APPL. 18535/2018 & 47683/2018 Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. ..... Appellant This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 19.02.2018 passed in motor accident claim petition numbered as MACT No.5723/2016. The challenge is on the ground that there was no eye witness to the fatal accident thus there is no blame or liability of the offending vehicle, which was insured by the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant refers to the DAR filed by the Investigating Officer and submits that the impugned order was passed merely on the basis of the Site-Plan but nothing was shown to the effect, that the alleged offending vehicle was involved in the accident or that it was due to negligence on the part of the ...
Anmol Katyal & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1613/2019 ANMOL KATYAL & ORS Decided on :24. h July, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. G.K. Bharti, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State Mr. Samarth Tootia, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 14.07.2016. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.419/2017 having been registered on 27.07.2017 by police station Rajouri Garden on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4read with Section 377 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his parents (second and third petitioner), the allegation qua offence under Section 37...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »