Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms Sharmila vs.smt Gurmit Kaur & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~OS-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:25. 07.2019 + CS(OS) 17/2017 MS SHARMILA Through Mr.J.K.Jain and Mr.Tushant, Advs. ..... Plaintiff Versus SMT GURMIT KAUR & OTHERS Through Mr.Satbir Singh, Adv. for D-1 to D-6 Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, Adv.for D-15 ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a preliminary decree for partition of the joint properties of the plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 8 by metes and bounds as per their share in the joint properties, details of which are as follow (para 5 of the plaint): Property in extended Lal Dora plot No.474 measuring A. 4378 sq.yds., as shown in Plan, ANNEXURE: P.1. Shri Prem Chand and his brothers were co-sharers in the B. land of extended Lal Dora plot Nos.202 (1-0), 49(0-5) AND4711 (4-10). These khasra numbers were mutually divided by Shri Prem Chand and others. Shri Prem Chand was allotted land of extended Lal Dora plot No.202 (1-...
Ved Prakash & Ors. Vs.ved Prakash & Anr. (Reliance General Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17-20 & 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 785/2018 & CM APPL. 35853/2018 Decided on:25. 07.2019 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR versus + MAC.APP. 1063/2018 KAMLESH DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 790/2018 & CM APPL. 35878/2018 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 103/2019 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ORS ..... Appellants versus VED PARAKASH & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..... Respondent MAC.APP. Nos.785, 1063, 790,103,1076/2018, 51,323,324/2019 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 1076/2018 SUMITRA DEVI ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD + MAC.APP. 51/2019 & CM APPL. 911/2019 VED PRAKASH & ORS versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants VED PRAKASH & ANR ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.A...
Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports Through: mr.sunil Garg vs.swiss Tim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 371/2017 & IA119922017 Date of Decision :25. h July, 2019 MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS & SPORTS THROUGH: ........ Petitioner MR.SUNIL GARG Through: Mr.Rajeev Mehra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.R.K.Aggarwal, Ms.Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advs. versus SWISS TIMING LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashim Krishna, Ms.Roopali Singh, Ms.Sayobani Basu, Mr.Aditya Kumar, Ms.Senu Nizan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 21.06.2017, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Timing, Scoring and Results System Services Agreement dated O.M.P. (COMM) No.371/2017 Page 1 11.03.2010, executed between the Organizing Committee, Commonwealth Games, 2010, Delhi (assets and liabilit...
Dimension Data India Private Limited vs.vertex Customer Management Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h July, 2019 CS(COMM) 1020/2016 DIMENSION DATA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dhruv Wahi & Ms. Aparna Iyer, Advs. Versus VERTEX CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam, Mr. Amit Punj Mr. Abhimanyu Walia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.13101/2018 (of the defendant under Order IX Rule 13 CPC), IA No.13102/2018 (for stay of judgment dated 13th October, 2017) & IA No.13103/2018 (for condonation of 3 days delay in applying therefor) 1. The counsel for the applicant / defendant has been heard.2. The plaintiff instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.1,91,73,992.07 paise from the applicant / defendant.3. The suit first came up before this Court on 3rd August, 2016, when the same was entertained and summons thereof ordered to be issued.4. The order dated 27th October, 2016 records that the summons sent to the applicant / defendant at the add...
Director General, e.s.i.c. Vs.saurabh Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
* % + W.P.(C) 2853/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:22. 07.2019 Judgment delivered on:24. .07.2019 DIRECTOR GENERAL, E.S.I.C. .Petitioner Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. Diwankar Sethi, Advocates for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate versus SAURABH KUMAR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Advocate for R- 3 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The Director General, Employees State Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ESIC) has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 05.09.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.1427/ 2012 preferred by respondent 1- Saurabh Kumar. The Tribunal has allowed the said Original Application and directed the petitioner to prepare an All India Seniority list of the Lower Division Clerk (LDC) cadre of the ESIC W.P.(C.)...
Ashwani Kumar vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7984/2019 & CM APPL. 33178-33179/2019 ASHWANI KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Abhay Kumar, Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Mr. Vineet Kumar Singh, Advocates. Versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for Nr.D.M.C along with Ms. Swagata Bhuyan, Ms. Shiva Pandey, Ms. Rikita Ganju along with Mr. Naved Khan, Licensing Inspector, Karol Bagh Zone. Ms. Nandini Aishwarya, Advocate for R3 & R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER2407.2019 CM APPL. 33179/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 7984/2019 & CM APPL. 33178/2019 (stay) 1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner praying inter alia for quashing a Circular dated 01.07.2019, issued by the respondent No.1/ North Delhi Municipal Corporation (in short Nr.DMC) stating inter alia that in view of the ongoing pedestrianisation project in and ...
Gyanwati vs.pentamed Hospital
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h July, 2019 Through: Mr.Puneet Kumar Agarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioner $~62 * % GYANWATI + W.P.(C) 10190/2018 versus PENTAMED HOSPITAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.65,000/- has been awarded to the petitioner in lieu of reinstatement and back wages. The petitioner is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as a Housekeeper on 04th September, 2008 and she was terminated from service on 01st March, 2012. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court.3. The Labour Court held the termination of the respondent to be illegal. However, the Labour Court declined the relief of reinstatement on the W.P.(C) 10190/2018 Page 1 of 3 ground that much time had lapsed aft...
Saraswati & Ors vs.mustarif & Ors (National Insurance Co. Ltd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~8 * % + MAC.APP. 325/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. 07.2019 ..... Appellants SARASWATI & ORS Through: Mr. Ram Dayal Sahalia, Adv. versus MUSTARIF & ORS (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-3. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal seeks enhancement of award of compensation dated 02.08.2017 passed in MACT No.403/2017 on the ground that it is on the lesser side; that non-pecuniary damages towards loss of consortium and other grounds have not been awarded. It also seeks enhancement towards loss of future prospects in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Company vs Pranay Sethi 2017 ACJ2700 The total compensation awarded in the impugned order is as under: S. No.Description Amount 1 2 Loss of Dependency Rs. 11,32,200/- Funeral Expenses Rs. 25,000/- MAC.APP. No.325/2018 Page 1 of 3 3 4 5 6 Loss of Love & Affection Rs. 1,00,000/- Loss of Estate Rs...
State vs.amar Pal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
* % + STATE AMAR PAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h July, 2019 CRL.L.P. 426/2016 Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the ........ Petitioner State with SI Raju Yadav, P.S. Sultan Puri. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.S.P. Rana and V.V Arya, with Advocates along Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.12560/2016 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 152 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 426/2016 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 20th November 2015 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent Amar Pal for the offence punishable under SectionIPC, the State has preferred the present leave petition.2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 3rd April 2013, at around 1:20 P.M., when the complainant returned home from work she found that there was mud in front of her house which was ca...
Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs.ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2019
$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA12011 BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. Date of Decision- 24.07.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish Srivastav, Adv. versus ASHOK KUMAR Through: Mr.Ujjwal Kr. Agarwal, Advs. ..... Respondent Jha & Mr.B.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assails the judgment and order dated 26.08.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Central, Delhi in Suit No.whereunder the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff was decreed. The suit assailed the inspection report dated 26.05.2006 as also the speaking order dated 22.06.2006 passed by the appellant, holding the respondent guilty of dishonest abstraction of energy (DAE), and the consequential bill of Rs.8,32,422/- and sought that the same be declared as inoperative. The respondent further sought that the appellant be restrained from disconnecting the electricity supply to his pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »