Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shashank vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 07.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 692/2019 SHASHANK ........ Petitioner versus STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Sunil Dalal with Mr. Rajiv Singh and Mr. Devashish Bhadauria, Advocates. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with the Investigating Officer. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.39/2019 under Section 354-D/323/427/506 of IPC and Section 12 of POCSO Act, Police Station Defence Colony.2. The prosecutrix is aged 17 years and 11 months and a student of a college in South Delhi. It is contended that she knew the petitioner for the last 3-4 years and was in touch with him over BAIL APPLN.692/2019 Page 1 of 3 Facebook and social media. It is alleged that recently prior to lodging of the FIR she stopped talking to him because of his bad...
Global Infonet Distribution Pvt. Ltd. Vs.lenovo (India) Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~OS-6 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 07.2019 + CS(COMM) 658/2017 GLOBAL INFONET DISTRIBUTION PVT. LTD. Through Mr.Asit Tewari Rastogi, Advs. ..... Plaintiff and Ms.Ankita versus LENOVO (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .... Defendants Through Mr.Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Arush Khanna and Ms.Shreya Singh, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Sudhir Kumar and Ms.Ashna Abrol, Advs. for D-2. Mr.Purushattam Kr.Jha, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA Nos.2827/2018, 2458/2018 & 4464/2018 1. These three applications are filed by defendants No.1, 2 and 3 respectively under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs.17,70,39,462/-. It is pleaded in the plaint that the plaintiff is engaged in trading and distribution of computers, laptops computer hardware etc. It is stated that defendant No.1 approached the plaintiff company in 2014 and represented to the plaintiff...
Anil Kumar @ Anil Singh vs.arjun Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~13 * % + MAC.APP. 603/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. 07.2019 ANIL KUMAR @ ANIL SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate. versus ARJUN SINGH AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.L. Gupta and Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 24829/2017 (for delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is allowed. The delay 1. of 140 days in filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 603/2017 3. The appellant has impugned the award of compensation on the ground that it is on the lesser side.4. It is the case of the appellant that he has suffered 45% permanent disability in the right lower limb. He worked as a helper and was employed by a private company and his work entailed a lot of physical movements, but now he would not be able to use almost half of his lower limbs. His MAC.APP. 603/2017 Page 1 of 2 movements are severely hamp...
Sumitra Devi vs.reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17-20 & 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 785/2018 & CM APPL. 35853/2018 Decided on:25. 07.2019 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR versus + MAC.APP. 1063/2018 KAMLESH DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 790/2018 & CM APPL. 35878/2018 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 103/2019 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ORS ..... Appellants versus VED PARAKASH & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..... Respondent MAC.APP. Nos.785, 1063, 790,103,1076/2018, 51,323,324/2019 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 1076/2018 SUMITRA DEVI ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD + MAC.APP. 51/2019 & CM APPL. 911/2019 VED PRAKASH & ORS versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants VED PRAKASH & ANR ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.A...
Ankit Gupta vs.rajesh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~40 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3608/2019 and CM APPL.16541/2019 ANKIT GUPTA Through: Mr. Puneet Maheshwari, ........ Petitioner versus Mr.Dharmender Sharma, Advocates RAJESH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Naman Jain, Advocate for Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD Inspector B.S. Gulia, P.S. Moti Nagar Mr.Kaushik Sadhukan, Inspector under the Factories Act Mr.A.K. Jaiswal, Asst. Regn. Officer, Delhi Fire Service Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the order dated 18th January, 2019 1. whereby the Commissioner, Employees Compensation directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.45,74,240/- as compensation in respect of death of seven persons in the incident dated 03rd January, 2019.2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground that the same has been passed without issuing any show cause notice or affording an opport...
Haji Zafruddin vs.firozuddin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d July, 2019 Pronounced on:25. h July, 2019 CM(M) 547/2019 & CM Appl. 16342/2019 HAJI ZAFRUDDIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.D.Ansari & Mr.I.Ahmed, Advocates versus FIROZUDDIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ramkrishan Saini, Advocate % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order of the ADJ-07 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, dated 07.03.2019 in Suit No.54/2016, whereby the Trial Court has directed the appointment of a Local Commissioner to execute a sale deed in respect of the suit property. Facts 2. The suit arises out of an Agreement to Sell dated 07.01.2016 between the petitioner/defendant and the respondent/plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the respondent for specific performance of the said CM(M) 547/2019 Page 1 of 20 agreement. Pursuant to submissions of the parties held in various orders, the Trial Court by the impugned...
Jasvinder Singh Sahni & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 25, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3569/2019 JASVINDER SINGH SAHNI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Tajinder Singh and Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI G.P. Pal Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.31887/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3569/2019 Quashing of FIR No.431/2018, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 29th March, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI G.P. Pal on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2...
Som Dutt & Anr. Vs.reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17-20 & 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 785/2018 & CM APPL. 35853/2018 Decided on:25. 07.2019 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR versus + MAC.APP. 1063/2018 KAMLESH DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 790/2018 & CM APPL. 35878/2018 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 103/2019 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ORS ..... Appellants versus VED PARAKASH & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..... Respondent MAC.APP. Nos.785, 1063, 790,103,1076/2018, 51,323,324/2019 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 1076/2018 SUMITRA DEVI ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD + MAC.APP. 51/2019 & CM APPL. 911/2019 VED PRAKASH & ORS versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants VED PRAKASH & ANR ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.A...
Airports Authority of India vs.neeraj Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~44 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 07.2019 LPA4812019 and C.M.Appl. No.32993/2019 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate. versus Through None. NEERAJ YADAV CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH ..... Respondent G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CM APPL329952019 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL329962019 (delay in filing) 3. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant under Section 5 of Limitation Act seeking condonation of 65 days delay in filing the present Letters Patent Appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 65 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. LPA No.481/2019 Page 1 of 7 5. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL329942019 (Additional documents) 6. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant...
Janak Datwani vs.c N a Exports Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TR.P.(C.) 57/2019 JANAK DATWANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Abhimanyu Mahajan, Mr and Ms Sarthak Mehrotra Anubha Goel, Advocates. versus C N A EXPORTS PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Suresh Singh, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Mr Naveen Kumar Choudhary, Advocate for R-5. Mr Saurabh Seth and Mr Alabhya Dhamija, Advocates for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2507.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter the Code), inter alia, praying that the suit bearing CS No.57826/2016 (earlier numbered CS(OS) 1113/2007 captioned Janak Datwani v. CNA Exports Pvt. Ltd.) in the court of Additional District Judge, Patiala House be transferred to this Court.2. The said suit was initially filed before this Court in the year TR.P.(C) 57/2019 Page 1 of 7 2007 and was transferred to the District Court by an order dated 18.01.2016, on acc...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »