Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Compack Enterprises India (P) Ltd vs.beant Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"25.07.2019 + RFA2532018 COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajesh Banati with Mr.Vikram Pratap, Adv. versus BEANT SINGH Through: Mr.Harpreet Singh Uppal with Mr.Mohit Dewan & Mr.Yash Prakash Sharan, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) REV. PET. 177/2019 CM No.18546/2019 (for stay) 1. The present review petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the tenant/appellant seeks review of judgment dated 14.02.2019 passed by HMJ Valmiki J Mehta, whereunder this Court had passed a common consent order disposing of the cross appeals filed by the landlord as also by the tenant. The tenant/appellant had preferred the appeal seeking reduction in mesne profits while the landlord had preferred the appeal seeking enhancement of mesne profits.2. The appeals were disposed of by recording that the tenant will h...
Braham Prakash & Ors. Vs.ved Prakash & Anr. (Reliance General Insuranc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17-20 & 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 785/2018 & CM APPL. 35853/2018 Decided on:25. 07.2019 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR versus + MAC.APP. 1063/2018 KAMLESH DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 790/2018 & CM APPL. 35878/2018 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 103/2019 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ORS ..... Appellants versus VED PARAKASH & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..... Respondent MAC.APP. Nos.785, 1063, 790,103,1076/2018, 51,323,324/2019 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 1076/2018 SUMITRA DEVI ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD + MAC.APP. 51/2019 & CM APPL. 911/2019 VED PRAKASH & ORS versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants VED PRAKASH & ANR ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.A...
Renu Devi and Ors. Vs.national Ins. Co. Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~7, 8 & 9 * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 532/2016 KAMAR JAHAN AND ORS versus NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR MAC.APP. 550/2016 Decided on:25. 07.2019 ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS SHABANA AND ORS versus ..... Appellants NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR MAC.APP. 543/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS RENU DEVI AND ORS ..... Appellants versus NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for appellants. Mr. Arihant Jain and Ms. Shantha Devi, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) The appellants have impugned an order dated 17.12.2015 dismissing 1. the claim for a compensation under 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MAC APP. 532, 550 & 543/2016 Page 1 of 4 The facts of the case are that three persons were attending to the punctured tyre of a truck near a petrol station. They were all employed by the owner of the truck. While they were standing near the truck and the mechanic was carryi...
Ramesh Chander Tyagi vs.state Thr. c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~32 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h July, 2019 + CRL.A. 753/2000 RAMESH CHANDER TYAGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Suhail Malik, Mr. Vikas Malik and Mr. Vikas Bhalla, Advocates versus STATE THR. C.B.I. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, SPP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant was arrested by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 09.09.1994, statedly during the course of investigation into first information report (FIR) registered vide RC No.64(A)/94 on the complaint (Ex. PW1/A) of Manoj Kumar Sharma (PW1), and was brought to trial in the court of the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) on the basis of evidence gathered and presented by report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC), which was registered as criminal case (CC no.138/99). The trial was held on the accusations for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of...
Ashok Rani vs.sheela Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"25.07.2019 RFA5112012 & CM No.19729/2014 ASHOK RANI Through Mr.R.P.Taman, Adv. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent SHEELA DEVI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI Through Mr.Sudeep Sudan, Adv. REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present regular first appeal u/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the defendant/appellant impugning the judgment and order dated 15.09.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, whereunder the suit being CS No.195/instituted by the respondent seeking partition and permanent injunction has been decreed.2. The respondent/Ms.Sheela Devi, who was the legally wedded wife of late Mr.Bahadur Singh had instituted the captioned suit seeking partition and injunction qua the property left behind by her late husband Mr.Bahadur Singh. It was pleaded that her husband had expired on 26.02.2004 leaving behind two legal heirs; the respondent his legally ...
Lal Chand vs.reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17-20 & 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 785/2018 & CM APPL. 35853/2018 Decided on:25. 07.2019 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR versus + MAC.APP. 1063/2018 KAMLESH DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 790/2018 & CM APPL. 35878/2018 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 103/2019 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ORS ..... Appellants versus VED PARAKASH & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..... Respondent MAC.APP. Nos.785, 1063, 790,103,1076/2018, 51,323,324/2019 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 1076/2018 SUMITRA DEVI ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD + MAC.APP. 51/2019 & CM APPL. 911/2019 VED PRAKASH & ORS versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants VED PRAKASH & ANR ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.A...
Kamar Jahan & Ors. Vs.national Ins Co. Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~7, 8 & 9 * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 532/2016 KAMAR JAHAN AND ORS versus NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR MAC.APP. 550/2016 Decided on:25. 07.2019 ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS SHABANA AND ORS versus ..... Appellants NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR MAC.APP. 543/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS RENU DEVI AND ORS ..... Appellants versus NATIONAL INS CO LTD AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for appellants. Mr. Arihant Jain and Ms. Shantha Devi, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) The appellants have impugned an order dated 17.12.2015 dismissing 1. the claim for a compensation under 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MAC APP. 532, 550 & 543/2016 Page 1 of 4 The facts of the case are that three persons were attending to the punctured tyre of a truck near a petrol station. They were all employed by the owner of the truck. While they were standing near the truck and the mechanic was carryi...
Aruna Swakar & Ors. Vs.hemant Kumar & Ors. (Ms Iffco Tokio General Ins ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~12 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. 07.2019 + MAC.APP. 521/2017 & CM APPL. 21903/2017 ARUNA SWAKAR & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. Versus HEMANT KUMAR & ORS (M/S IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant impugns the awarded amount on the ground that metropolitan allowance and ration monies i.e. Rs. 180/- and Rs. 2,665/-, respectively, have not been added to the income of the deceased, for the purposes of computing loss of dependency.2. It is the appellants contention that these two allowances are not personal to the deceased policeman but would, by their very nature, be used by the dependant family.3. The Court is persuaded by the logic in this argument. Accordingly, these two allowances shall be considered in computation of loss of MAC.APP. 521/2017 Page 1 of 3 dependency. However, 1/4th of ...
Har Kishore Sharma vs.the Mgmt. Of g.f.r. co.p.ltd. (Imperial Cable)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~2 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7721/2007 HAR KISHORE SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Narender Malawalia, Mr.Rikin Aswal, Advocates 1. versus THE MGMT. OF G.F.R. CO.P.LTD. (IMPERIAL CABLE) Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.50,000/- has been awarded to him.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as an Operator in 1987 and he was terminated on 30th April, 1998. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court.3. The Labour Court held the termination to be illegal. The Labour Court awarded compensation of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner in lieu of reinstatement.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged at the time of the hearing that the compensation awarded is grossly inadequate. It is submitted that the W.P.(C) 7721/2007 Page 1 of 2 petitioner worked w...
Sumitra Devi (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.reliance General Insurance Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2019
$~17-20 & 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + MAC.APP. 785/2018 & CM APPL. 35853/2018 Decided on:25. 07.2019 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR versus + MAC.APP. 1063/2018 KAMLESH DEVI ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 790/2018 & CM APPL. 35878/2018 LAL CHAND ..... Appellant versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 103/2019 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ORS ..... Appellants versus VED PARAKASH & ANR (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..... Respondent MAC.APP. Nos.785, 1063, 790,103,1076/2018, 51,323,324/2019 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 1076/2018 SUMITRA DEVI ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS .... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD + MAC.APP. 51/2019 & CM APPL. 911/2019 VED PRAKASH & ORS versus ..... Respondent ..... Appellants VED PRAKASH & ANR ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.A...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »