Skip to content

Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 26 2019

Machino Plastics Ltd. & Anr. Vs.caparo Maruti Ltd. & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:26. h July, 2019 CS(OS) 756/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus M.D.JINDAL Through: Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and ..... Defendant Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3 & D-5. CS(OS) 757/2005 M/S CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus SURYA KANT AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. M.C. Kocchar, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. CS(OS) 761/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff CS(OS) 756/2005 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3...


Jul 26 2019

Lalita vs.state & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 282/2019 Date of Decision:26.07.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: LALITA STATE & ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Advocate and Ms. Richa Dhawan , Advocate versus Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State Mr. Archit Upadhyay, Advocate (DHCLSC) for R2 and R3 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed under Section 397 r/w Section 482 CrPC assailing the order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the Special Judge (P.C. Act) CBI-01 (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Crl. Appeal No.65/2018.2. The facts of the prosecution, as noted by the trial court, are that the... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 faced trial in the FIR No.05/2009 registered under Sections 324 r/w 34 IPC at P.S. Nabi Karim. After the trial, vide judgment dated 04.10.2018, the... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 were acquitted of all the charges by the Metropolitan Magistrate.3. The ord...


Jul 26 2019

R C Anand vs.joginder Singh & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h July, 2019 + CM(M) 1103/2019 & CM APPL. 33440-33441/2019 R C ANAND ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kuldeep Sehrawat, Advocate. versus JOGINDER SINGH & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CM APPL. 33441/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1103/2019 & CM APPL. 33440/2019 1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against an order dated 20.02.2019, in CS No.9771/2016, by which the Additional District Judge-12, (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi has dismissed the application of the petitioner/plaintiff for amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter, the CPC]..2. The suit was filed by the plaintiff on 13.06.2007, for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 04.12.2006. It was originally CM(M) 110...


Jul 26 2019

Shiva @ Gaurav & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2019 + CRL.A. 515/2018 + SHIVA @ GAURAV & ANR ..... Appellants versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent CRL.A. 517/2018 SUNNY & ANR ..... Appellants versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Mr. R.C. Tiwari with Mr. Divyank Tiwari, Advocates with appellants in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Vinay, PS Ambedkar Nagar. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.A. 515/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 724/2018 (for suspension of sentence) & CRL.A. 517/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 726/2018 (for suspension of sentence) Crl.A..515/2018 & Crl.A.517/2018 Page 1 of 6 1. Appellants impugn judgment on conviction dated 12.04.2018 and order on sentence dated 13.04.2018, whereby, appellants Shiva @ Gaurav and Shibu @ Shiv Nath have been convicted of an offence under Section ...


Jul 26 2019

Caparo Maruti Ltd. Vs.machino Plastics Ltd. And Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:26. h July, 2019 CS(OS) 756/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus M.D.JINDAL Through: Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and ..... Defendant Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3 & D-5. CS(OS) 757/2005 M/S CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus SURYA KANT AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. M.C. Kocchar, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. CS(OS) 761/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff CS(OS) 756/2005 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3...


Jul 26 2019

Ntpc Executives Federation of India (Nefi) vs.ntpc Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 13171/2018 & CM APPLN. 51120/2018 NTPC EXECUTIVES FEDERATION OF INDIA (NEFI) ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Achal Gupta & Ms.Annie Rais, Advs. versus NTPC LTD. Through Mr.I S Alag, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Adarsh ..... Respondent Tripathi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction as under:-"a) Pass a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ direction or order thereby striking down the arbitrary and cryptic order dated 25th June 2018; and b) Pass a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order thereby directing the respondent to declare W.P.(C) 13171/2018 Page 1 of 5 the total number of vacancies in each category of executives before the promotion process begins; and c) Pass a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order thereby directing th...


Jul 26 2019

Chet Ram Gupta (Now Deceased) Through Substituted Complainant vs.s.p. ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

$~21 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"26th July, 2019 Crl.M.C. 1998/2019 & Crl.M.A. 7901/2019 CHET RAM GUPTA (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINANT ........ Petitioner S.P. GUPTA Through: Mr. Vaibhav Mahajan, Adv. versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The father of the petitioner had instituted a criminal complaint (CC No.616570/2016) on 07.02.1992, inter alia, against the respondent alleging offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120 B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed. On the basis of pre-summoning evidence, the respondent was summoned as accused. Since the case arose out of a private complaint, it involving an offence triable as a warrant case, pre-charge evidence was led. On conclusion of the said exercise, the Metropolitan Magistrate considered as to whether charge was made out on the evidence that had been adduced. By order dated 06.11.2017, the Metropolitan Magistrate answered th...


Jul 26 2019

Raghav Singh @ Rishabh vs.state ( Government of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 838/2019 RAGHAV SINGH @ RISHABH ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..Respondent Mr. C.S.S. Tomar, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. SI Ravinder Kumar, Spl. Staff. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 838/2019 & Crl.M.A.6887/2019 (for interim relief) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.61/2018 under Section 394/397/379/411/120-B of Indian Penal Code, P.S.Jama Masjid (investigation now stands transferred to Special Staff, Central District, Kamla Market).2. The subject FIR has been registered on the complaint of an employee of Sanjay Sales Agency. As per the complainant, he was instructed by the owner to 3. BAIL APPLN.838/2019 Page 1 of 3 transport goods and money in a van from their shop at Fateh Puri, D...


Jul 26 2019

Caparo Maruti Ltd. Vs.m.d.jindal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:26. h July, 2019 CS(OS) 756/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus M.D.JINDAL Through: Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and ..... Defendant Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3 & D-5. CS(OS) 757/2005 M/S CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus SURYA KANT AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. M.C. Kocchar, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. CS(OS) 761/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff CS(OS) 756/2005 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3...


Jul 26 2019

Ghv (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.national Highway Ahtority of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-26-2019

$~22 * % + W.P.(C) 8102/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. 07.2019 GHV (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Samir Malik, Ms. Bani Aikshit and Ms. Monica Benjamin, Advocates. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AHTORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Sweta and Ms. Shivangi Khanna, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.33584/2019 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8102/2019 2. A bid was invited pertaining to Bid/Package No.NHAI/BM/Delhi- Vadodara/2018/Pkg17 dated 24.5.2019, for construction of eight lane access- controlled expressway from Rajasthan/MP Border to Jodmi village of Mandsaur district. (CG. 452+420 to 484+420: Design Ch. 0+000 to Ch. 32+000) Section of Delhi-Vadodara Greenfield Alignment (NH-148N) under W.P.(C) 8102/2019 Page 1 of 13 Bharat...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial