Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3619/2019 RAHUL & ORS. Through: Mr .Yogesh Chhabra, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Surender Singh Mr. A.R. Tayade, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.32056/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3619/2019 Quashing of FIR No.1557/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 31st July, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Surender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3619/2019 Page 1 of 3 Responden...
Rohit vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
Raj Kumar Thapa vs.amit Arora & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. 07.2019 + MAC.APP. 1027/2013 & CM APPL. 43633/2018 RAJ KUMAR THAPA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajan Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus AMIT ARORA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Tripathi, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant has impugned the order of compensation on the ground that it is on the lesser side and that it needs modification because certain aspects were not on record before the learned MACT at the time of adjudication of the claim petition. The appellant had filed a claim petition for damages resulting from a motor-accident. An amount of Rs. 2,46,400/- has been awarded to him apropos the injuries sustained by him. Primarily, the components of the compensation amount are i) medical expenses, ii) special diet and conveyance, iii) loss of income for a period of ten months and iv) pain and suffering.2. I...
The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. Vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~34 * + W.P.(C) 11344/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. 07.2019 THE HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Gupta with Mr. Ateev Mathur, Ms. Jagriti Ahuja and Mr. Amol Sharma, Advs. versus UOI & ORS. Through Ms. Manju Saxena, R-2 in person ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM APPL. 33275/2019 1. The present application has been filed in the disposed writ petition. Vide the application, the applicant seeks direction thereby directing the petitioner to release excess amount in favour of the applicant as recorded vide Order dated 15.12.2006 & 03.07.2013.2. Vide order dated 15.12.2006 passed in CM APPLN. 12492/2006 in W.P.(C) 12602/2006, the applicant herein claims to be a poor work-woman, however, record shows that she was drawing a salary of 59,000/- per month WP (C) 11344/2009 Page 1 of 11 approximately and she had also received more than 8,00,000/- after adjustme...
Yogesh Malhotra vs.sonia Malhotra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2019 CRL.REV.P. 618/2017 YOGESH MALHOTRA SONIA MALHOTRA & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS... Petitioner in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Abhay Kumar and Ms. Jyoti Sinha, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Yogesh Tanwar, P.S.Kalkaji. : JUDGMENT2607.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 02.05.2017 whereby the appeal of the petitioner under Section 341 of the Criminal Procdure Code (Cr.P.C. for short) impugning order dated 11.03.2013 has been dismissed.2. The petitioner had filed an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C contending that he was facing a kalandra under Section CRL.REV.P.618/2017 Page 1 of 5Cr.P.C. and contradictory statements had been made by the complainant/respondent herein.3. 4. The parties are neighbours. A kala...
Brahmanand Group of Institutions vs.all India Council for Technical Ed ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement Reserved on :26. 06.2019 Judgment pronounced on :26. .07.2019 + W.P.(C) 5277/2019 BRAHMANAND GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate for AICTE. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the 1. Scrutiny Report dated 13.09.2018, rendered by the All India Council for Technical Education (hereinafter referred to as AICTE) as also the quashing of the extension of approval letter dated 29.04.2019 whereby, the respondent No.1 has disallowed the intake of any seat in the course of Bachelor of Pharmacy (hereinafter referred to as B. Pharma) for the academic year 2019-2020. A direction is sought to respondent No.1 to issue extension of approval to the petitioner college for 60 seats in B.Pharma for the academic year 2019-202...
M/S Caparo Maruti Ltd. Vs.surya Kant Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
* + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:26. h July, 2019 CS(OS) 756/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus M.D.JINDAL Through: Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and ..... Defendant Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3 & D-5. CS(OS) 757/2005 M/S CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. versus SURYA KANT AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. M.C. Kocchar, Advocate for D-1. Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai and Ms. Prachi Gobchha, Advocates. CS(OS) 761/2005 CAPARO MARUTI LTD. ..... Plaintiff CS(OS) 756/2005 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sagar Chawla and Mr. Upinder Singh, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Yashvardhan Bandi and Ms. Riya, Advocates for D-2, D-3...
Sanjiv Dutta vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3614/2019 & CRL.M.A. 32036/2019 SANJIV DUTTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Milan Laskar, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vikas Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.299/2010, under Sections 341/420/467/471 of IPC, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 22nd July, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. At the outset, petitioners counsel submits that there is typographical error in the memo of parties and he has handed over the amended memo of parties which is taken on record. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2,...
In the Matter of Vangelz Techonologies Pvt. Ltd (In Members‟vol. Liq ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~CP- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:26. 07.2019 + CO.PET. 364/2011 IN THE MATTER OF VANGELZ TECHONOLOGIES PVT. LTD (IN MEMBERSVOL. LIQN.). ....... Petitioner Through Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) Co. Appl. No.742/2019 1. This application is filed under section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking dissolution of the company VANGELZ TECHONOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said Company) and discharge of the Official Liquidator as the companys liquidator.2. A perusal of the petition shows that the said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act having Corporate Identity Number U28939DL19999PTC100846 under the name VANGELZ TECHONOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED with Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana.3. The authorized shar...
Sunny & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2019 + CRL.A. 515/2018 + SHIVA @ GAURAV & ANR ..... Appellants versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent CRL.A. 517/2018 SUNNY & ANR ..... Appellants versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Mr. R.C. Tiwari with Mr. Divyank Tiwari, Advocates with appellants in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Vinay, PS Ambedkar Nagar. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.A. 515/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 724/2018 (for suspension of sentence) & CRL.A. 517/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 726/2018 (for suspension of sentence) Crl.A..515/2018 & Crl.A.517/2018 Page 1 of 6 1. Appellants impugn judgment on conviction dated 12.04.2018 and order on sentence dated 13.04.2018, whereby, appellants Shiva @ Gaurav and Shibu @ Shiv Nath have been convicted of an offence under Section ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »