Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms. Charumati Sharma vs.chairman , Dda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 1756/2019 1. MS. CHARUMATI SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through... Petitioner in person. versus CHAIRMAN , DDA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Akshay Chandra, Ms.Parul Parthi & Ms.Shweta Saini, Advs. for DDA. Mr.Rajiv Gandhi, Comm.(Housing), Mr.B.M. Thareja DW(H), Mr.J.S. Negi, Dy. Dir.(SFS), Mr.Naresh Kr. Sharma, Asstt. Dir.(SFS), Mr.Dwivedi, Jr. Law Officer & Mr.A.K. Arora, AE (SWD-6) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction as under: i. Issue appropriate orders against DDA to stop deliberate threats against person and premises of complainant escalated by DDA and its employees and contractors during proceedings and ii. Issue Writ against DDA for restoring the overhead water tank W.P.(C) 1756/2019 Page 1 of 11 stolen/broken by mischief of DDA contractors and iii. That the DDA stop employing and usin...
K v S Rao vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. h July, 2019 + 1. CRL.M.C. 4443/2015 DR. ANBUMANI RAMADOSS ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with versus Promod Kumar Dubey, Mr. Vibhor Garg, Mr. Tushar Gupta and Mr. Sumit Kumar Mishra, Advocates. SUPDT. OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ACB/LUCKNOW ...Respondents Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, SPP for CBI. + 2. CRL.M.C. 4480/2015 DR. KESHAV KUMAR AGARWAL ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Abdhesh Chaudhary, Advocate with Ms. Sakshi Arora & Ms. Apurva Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) Through the Superintendent of Police, CGO Complex, New Delhi - 110003 ...Respondents Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, SPP for CBI. CRL.M.C. Nos. 4443/2015, 4480/2015 & 688/2017 & CRL. REV. P. 25/2016 Page 1 of 30 + 3. CRL.M.C. 688/2017 K V S RAO ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manvi Priya, Mr. Narender Singh Bisht & Mr. Nishant Singh Bisht, Advocates. versu...
Mahesh Chaudhri & Anr. Vs.imv India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 07.2019 CS(COMM) 900/2018 $~OS-42 & 44 * % + MAHESH CHAUDHRI & ANR. IMV INDIA PVT. LTD. versus Through Mr.Deepak Khadaria, Adv. ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant Through Mr.Kishan Rawat and Mr.Rajan Narain, Advs. CS(OS) 264/2018 IMV INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Kishan Rawat and Mr.Rajan Narain, Advs. versus MR. MAHESH CHAUDHRY & ANR Through Mr.Deepak Khadaria, Adv. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH + JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.5294/2019 in CS(COMM) 900/2018 1. This application is filed by the plaintiff under Order 11 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 seeking permission to take on record additional documents. It is pleaded that the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs.2,53,52,832/- under various heads including towards claims/dues of commission etc. Documents were filed by the CS(COMM) 900/2018 & CS...
Rati Pal Saroj vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29.07.2019 $~53 * + % W.P.(C.) No.8043/2019 RATI PAL SAROJ ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shanker Raju with Mr. Nilansh Gaur, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Suparna Srivastava with Ms. Nehul Sharma, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.33335/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.8043/2019 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 10.09.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.419/2013. The W.P.(C.) No.8043/2019 Page 1 of 23 Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioner, wherein he had assailed the inquiry proceedings and the consequent punishment order of dismissal from service inflicted upon him. The charge she...
Vikram & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
$~24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h July, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1714/2019 VIKRAM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Inderpal Khokhar and Mr. Arvind Kumars, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramesh, PS Mundka Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 09.03.2015. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.42/2016 having been registered on 19.01.2016 by police station Mundka, on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his parents (second and third petitioners), and his sister (fourth petitioner)....
Crop Care Federation of India and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2019
$-42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8117/2019 and CM Nos. 33678/2019, 33679/2019 & 33680/2019 CROP CARE FEDERATION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ankit Virmani and Ms Manasi Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Shoumendu Mukherji, GP with Mr Arjun Dev, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2907.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the Central Government (Appellate Authority), rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioners under Section 10 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 (hereafter the Insecticides Act). The petitioners had preferred the said appeal against the decision of the Registration Committee (hereafter RC) taken at its 370th Meeting held on 15.10.2016, to grant registration under Section 9(3) of the Insecti...
Randhawa Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7798/2015 RANDHAWA SINGH & ORS Through Mr. B.S.Mathur, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Chiranjeev Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for LAC/ L&B ORDER2607.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioners, 13 in all, are stated to be permanent residents of Village Tikri Khurd, Delhi. Originally, there was only one substantive prayer (a) seeking a declaration that the entire land acquisition proceedings under Award No.10/2008-09/DC(N-W) dated 16th February, 2009 in respect of the land in Khasra Nos. 24//24(4-16), 25(4-14), 28(0-4), 25//17(4-16), 18(4- 16), 19(4-16), 20/2(2-16), 21(4-16), 22(4-16), 23(4-16), 24(4-16), 33//l(4- 16), 10(4-16), 34//5(4-16), totally measuring 60 Bighas 10 Biswas situated in the aforementioned Vi...
Tarique vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 26, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3606/2019 TARIQUE Through: Mr. Shree Niwas Sharma, .....Petitioner Advocate with petitioner in person versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with Inspector Vinay Kumar Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 32019/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3606/2019 Quashing of FIR No.174/2018, under Section 376 of IPC, registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 5th July, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in que...
Shiv Kumar @ Shibu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 500/2019 ROHIT STATE Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH CRL.A. 504/2019 SHIV KUMAR @ SHIBU ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. M. Tufail, Advocate with Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Mr. Naahid Nasir, Advocates. STATE versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Insp. Rajeev Ranjan, SI Jasmes Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Mr. Kuber Giri with Mr. Sarvpreet Singh Chawla, Advocates for Victim-Complainant. WITH Page 1 of 49 Crl.A.500/2019 & Ors. + CRL.A. 819/2019 SUNIL alias ANNU ..... Appellant Through Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Mohit B., Advocate versus Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for ...
National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Sbg & Co
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2019
$~5 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EFA(OS) (COMM) 11/2019 & C.M.APPLNs.33412-13/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini and Mr. Somay Kapoor, Advocates versus M/S SBG & CO Through: Mr.Shiv Charan and Mr. Imran Khan, ..... Respondent Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER2607.2019 The appellant/Judgement Debtor, National Highways Authority of India (for short NHAI) is aggrieved by an order dated 03.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in an execution petition (OMP (ENF)(COMM) 1/2019) filed by the respondent/Decree Holder seeking execution of the Arbitral Award dated 07.06.2018, whereunder it has been directed to pay to the respondent, a sum of Rs.2,24,51,969/- alongwith interest at the rate of 27% per annum with monthly payments commencing from 21.07.2016. The appellant/J.D has also challenged the order dated 12.07.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge directing th...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »