Delhi Court June 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs.m.l. Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :11.12.2018 Date of decision:07.06.2019 L.A.APP.97/2018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sachin Nanwani, Advocate versus M.L. GUPTA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for R-2, 4, 5. Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate for R-3, 7, 8 & Lrs of R-1 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The Union of India, vide the present appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, seeks the setting aside of the judgment and order dated 11.04.2016 of the learned ADJ-01, East, KKD Courts, Delhi in LAC No.75/in the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), vide which the learned ADJ enhanced the compensation that was awarded to the petitioners therein i.e. the respondent nos. 1 to 8(a) to 8(d) by the Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter referred to as the LAC) from Rs.2850/- per square meter to Rs.5865/- per squar...
Sikodh Mahto vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2019
$~ * + + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 660/2017 SIKODH MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Adv. STATE CRL.A. 698/2017 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch PRABHU MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT6h June, 2019 Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A. 660/2017 & CRL.A. 698/2017 Page 1 of 40 as the NDPS Act). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of 1 lakh...
Prabhu Mahto vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2019
$~ * + + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 660/2017 SIKODH MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Adv. STATE CRL.A. 698/2017 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch PRABHU MAHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State with ASI Yashin Khan, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT6h June, 2019 Vide judgment dated 26th April, 2017, the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellants under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A. 660/2017 & CRL.A. 698/2017 Page 1 of 40 as the NDPS Act). As a consequence, vide separate order dated 29th April, 2017, the learned ASJ has sentenced each appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of 1 lakh...
p.d. Vs.u.w.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h June, 2019 + CONT.CAS(C) 338/2019 & CM Appl. 18484/2019 P.D. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee & Ms.Meera Menon, Advocates. versus U.W. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jyoti Taneja & Mr.Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. The present petition has been instituted in respect of alleged violations of an order dated 08.02.2019, passed by the Family Court, Dwarka in Civil Suit No.4/2019. The suit was filed by the petitioner (wife) against the respondent (husband). By the aforesaid order dated 08.02.2019, the Family Court granted an ex-parte injunction, restraining the respondent from proceeding with Docket No.FM-11-422-19L, filed before the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Mercer County. The petitioner alleges that, contrary to the injunction granted, the respondent has, in fact, proceeded with the said petition.2. The praye...
Shri Rakesh Arora vs.hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-04-2019
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :01.05.2018 Date of decision :04. 06.2019 Crl.M.C.No.2811/2016 SHRI RAKESH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate versus HAMDARD (WAKF) LABORATORIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv. Crl.M.C.No.2814/2016 SHRI RAKESH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate versus HAMDARD (WAKF) LABORATORIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv. and Crl.M.C.No.2815/2016 SHRI RAKESH ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate versus HAMDARD (WAKF) LABORATORIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv. Crl.M.C.2811, 2814 & 2815/2016 Page 1 of 33 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The three petitions bearing CRL.M.C. No.2811/2016, CRL.M.C. No.2814/2016 & CRL.M.C. No.2815/2016 filed by the same petitioner Shri Rakesh Arora against ...
R. N. Kapoor Memorial Homoeopathic Hospital and Medical College vs.uni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t June, 2019 CM No.28244/2019 in + W.P.(C) 12904/2018 R. N. KAPOOR MEMORIAL HOMOEOPATHIC HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL COLLEGE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth R.Gupta and Ms. Priyashree Sharma Ph., Advs. % UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC for R-1 with Mr. Sarvan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Sunil Narula, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.28245/2019 (exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12904/2018 and CM No.28244/2019 3. The prayers in this application read thus : (i) Stay the impugned order dated 25.10.2018 by which the... Petitioner's application for opening a new medical college has been rejected. W.P.(C) 12904/2018 Page 1 of 17 4. the respondent-CCH (ii) Direct to proceed and carryout the fresh inspection in terms of the applicable provisions/rules and regu...
Janta Adarsh Mahavidyalaya vs.national Council for Teacher Education a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6641/2019 & CM APPL. 28063/2019 (for stay) Date of Decision:1. t June, 2019 % 1. JANTA ADARSH MAHAVIDYALAYA Through: Ravi Kant, Advs. ........ Petitioner Mr. Mayank Manish and Mr. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arunima Dwivedi, SC for AICTE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The impugned order dated 27th March, 2019 dismisses the petitioners appeal, against order dated 4th January, 2017, passed by the Northern Regional Committee (NRC) of the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE), whereby the recognition, granted to the petitioner for conducting its B.Ed course, was withdrawn.2. The impugned order rejected the petitioners appeal solely on the ground of delay. The findings of the Appellate Committee, on the issue of delay, may be reproduced thus: the AND WHEREAS submission of the appeal has been delayed by one year, four months and 17 days be...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›