Delhi Court June 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.022 seconds)Shivangi Lal Through Her Guardian/Father Mr. Apurb Lal vs.central Boar ...
Court: Delhi
$~25 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26. h June, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6895/2019 & C.M. Appln. No.28675/2019 SHIVANGI LAL THROUGH HER GUARDIAN/FATHER MR. APURB LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Lal, Advocate versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed with the following prayers: - a. Direct the Respondent to grant full marks of the question on the basis of the correct and appropriate answer given by the... Petitioner. b. Call for the official records.2. The petition raises the following questions of law: - (i) Whether the petitioner is entitled to full marks on the in question which has been correctly answered accordance with the instructions of the respondent?. (ii) Whether the respondent has an authority to grant less W.P.(C) 6895/2019 Page 1 of 8 marks even then the answer given by the Examinee correctl...
Tag this Judgment!Eci-Nayak (Jv) vs.ircon International Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 26, 2019 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 205/2019 ECI-NAYAK (JV) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Chadha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Jha, Advocates versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abir Phukan, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.As.8608-09/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 205/2019 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing today itself.2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that twice the extension was granted to the petitioner to complete the project work i.e. Earthwork in filling in embankment provision of blanketing material construction of viaduct minor bridge and RUB in the stretch from KM000 (Agartala to Km 5.1 Indian Bangladesh Border) and construction of O.M.P...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Mayar Health Resorts Ltd vs.the Assistant Provident Fund Commissio ...
Court: Delhi
$~15 * % + W.P.(C) 6876/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24. 06.2019 M/S MAYAR HEALTH RESORTS LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Akanksha Kaul and Ms.Akanksha Narang, Advocates. versus THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & RECOVERY OFFICER & ANR ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.28626/2019 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6876/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 28625/2019 (for stay) 2. The petitioner entered into an agreement on 1st April, 2011 with Survagya IT Management Pvt. Ltd. whereby a Consultant was required to provide services on statutory compliances under the EPF/ESI and other labour laws, including payment of contribution towards the Employees Provident Fund. It is the case of the petitioner that it transferred adequate funds to the consultant for making the contribution and was under the impression that the said cheques w...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Gauri Shanker vs.shri Laxmi Chand
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.575/2017, CM. APPL. 46297/2017 & CM. APPL. 14645/2018 Judgment reserved on :02. 08.2018 Date of decision :15. 06.2019 SHRI GAURI SHANKER ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberoi & Siddharth Bhardwaj, Mr. Advocates. SHRI LAXMI CHAND versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa, Ms. Bandana Kaur Grover & Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Shri Gauri Shanker son of Late Shri Ramjit Sahni, the tenant of the respondent Sh. Laxmi Chand in the demised premises comprising of a shop measuring 5.93 square meters situated on the ground floor as shown in the site plan marked as Annexure-A to the eviction petition filed by the respondent herein as the petitioner of the eviction petition bearing No.E-80122/2016, vide the present petition has assailed the impugned order dated 07.10.2017 of the SCJ- cum-RC, Central, THC, Delhi in the said eviction petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Manas Shukla vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :14. 06.2019 Date of decision :14. 06.2019 CHARANPAL SINGH BAGRI + W.P.(C) 6751/2019 & CM APPL. 28336/2019 Through: Versus ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates. Mr. A. Mariar Putham, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Venkita Subramania, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv for R Mr. Romy Chacho, Adv for R-4 Mr. Apoorv Kurup & Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Adv for UGC. + W.P.(C) 6770/2019 & CM APPL. 28382-28383/2019 KHUSHI SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman W.P.(C) 6751/2019, 6770/2019 & 6774/2019 Page 1 of 17 Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 6774/2019 & CM APPL. 28395/2019 MANAS SHUK...
Tag this Judgment!Charanpal Singh Bagri vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :14. 06.2019 Date of decision :14. 06.2019 CHARANPAL SINGH BAGRI + W.P.(C) 6751/2019 & CM APPL. 28336/2019 Through: Versus ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates. Mr. A. Mariar Putham, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Venkita Subramania, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv for R Mr. Romy Chacho, Adv for R-4 Mr. Apoorv Kurup & Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Adv for UGC. + W.P.(C) 6770/2019 & CM APPL. 28382-28383/2019 KHUSHI SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman W.P.(C) 6751/2019, 6770/2019 & 6774/2019 Page 1 of 17 Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 6774/2019 & CM APPL. 28395/2019 MANAS SHUK...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs.punjab and Sind Bank
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P. (C) No.6730/2019, CM No.28291/2019 & CM No.28290/2019 Judgment reserved on:14. 06.2019 Date of decision :14.06.2019 Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritin Raj, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Mr. Aabhash Kshetrapal, Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj, Advs. Punjab and Sind Bank versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Suruchii Aggarwal, Mr. Suhaan Mukerji, Ms. Astha Sharma, Mr. Ravinder Singh, Ms. Kajal Dalal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM No.28291/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P. (C) No.6730/2019 & CM No.28290/2019 1. The petitioner vide the present petition has prayed for a declaration that paragraphs 5.2, 5.3, 5.8 & 5.9 of the Request for Proposal dated 09.04.2019 as issued by the respondent/ the Punjab and Sind Bank i.e. the Request for Proposal for selection of the Bandwidth Service Provider for providing data...
Tag this Judgment!Khushi Srivastava vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :14. 06.2019 Date of decision :14. 06.2019 CHARANPAL SINGH BAGRI + W.P.(C) 6751/2019 & CM APPL. 28336/2019 Through: Versus ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates. Mr. A. Mariar Putham, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Venkita Subramania, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Adv for R Mr. Romy Chacho, Adv for R-4 Mr. Apoorv Kurup & Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Adv for UGC. + W.P.(C) 6770/2019 & CM APPL. 28382-28383/2019 KHUSHI SRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman W.P.(C) 6751/2019, 6770/2019 & 6774/2019 Page 1 of 17 Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 6774/2019 & CM APPL. 28395/2019 MANAS SHUK...
Tag this Judgment!Anurag Sanghi & Anr. Vs.m/s Knitpro International
Court: Delhi
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TR. P. (C) No.93/2018 Judgment reserved on :02. 08.2018 Date of decision :11. 06.2019 ANURAG SANGHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani, Adv. with Mr. Samreen Khan, Adv. versus M/S KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Adv. And TR. P. (C) No.94/2018 ANURAG SANGHI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani, Adv. with Mr. Samreen Khan, Adv. versus M/S KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners Mr. Anurag Sanghi and M/s Sanghi International vide Transfer Petitions (C) 93/2018 & 94/2018 seek the withdrawal of the suit titled as Knitpro International Vs. Anurag TRP (C) 93 & 94/2017 Page 1 of 27 Sanghi bearing TM No.178/2017 & TM No.179/2017 both pending in the Court of the ADJ-04, PHC, New Delhi to this Court and seek that the same be tried with the suit titled as Kni...
Tag this Judgment!Lokesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 487/2016 LOKESH STATE Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI Anita Kumar, PS Delhi Cantt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT7h June, 2019 The appellant Lokesh stands convicted, by judgment dated 29th May, 2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the POCSO Act) and Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC), and sentenced, vide the consequential order, dated 4th June, 2015, to suffer rigourous imprisonment for 10 years along with fine of 7500/, with default sentence of 6 months simple imprisonment, for the offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. CRL.A. 487/2016 Page 1 of 54 2. The case, as set out by the prosecution, may be adumbr...
Tag this Judgment!