Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tushar Ranjan Mohanty vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9544/2018 & C.M.Nos.37135/2018, 16701/2019 Date of Decision:-"01.05.2019 TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY ........ Petitioner Through... Petitioner-in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, CGSC and Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI,J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, who appears in person, assails the order dated 07.08.2018 passed in OA No.4218/2015 by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal), whereby the said Original Application (O.A.) preferred by him was dismissed. The petitioner had filed the O.A. being aggrieved by the recording of his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the period 01.04.2012 to 31.07.2012. His representation against the same was rejected by the respondents, which rejection was also assailed by him before the Tribunal.2. The case of the petitio...
Mohit Kumar Garg & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 01, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2325/2019 & Crl.M.A. 9269/2019 MOHIT KUMAR GARG & ORS. Through: Mr. Varun Aggarwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sri Chand Mr. P.C.Gupta, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.A. 9269/2019 CRL.M.C. 2325/2019 Quashing of FIR No.148/2018, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 22nd April, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sri Chand on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 23...
Rita Solomon & Ors. Vs.the Republic of Italy & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1352/2013 RITA SOLOMON & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu Garg, Ms. PreetyMakkar and Ms. Aishwarya Kane, Advocates. versus THE REPUBLIC OF ITALY & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jaiveer Shergill, Advocate with Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Mr. Jaspal Singh, Advocates. % Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Date of Decision:01. t May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J I.A. 25904/2015 1. The present application has been filed under Order VII Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for rejection of the plaint by the defendants.2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed seeking declaration that the defendants have violated Article 157 of the Italian Presidential Decree No.103 dated 7th April, 2000 and have discriminated against the plaintiffs in the determination of salaries on the basis of CS (OS) 1352/2013 Page 1 of 20 nationality and for recovery ...
Ge India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
Vijay Pal Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4618/2019 and CM APPL. 20546/2019 Date of Decision:1st May, 2019. IN THE MATTER OF: VIJAY PAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh, Mr. Panchajanya B. Singh, Mr. Amir Suhail, Advocates with petitioner in person Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi, Advocate for R1 Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate for R2 and R3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: a. Direct the respondents to accept the nomination form filed by the petitioner whereupon allow him to contest the elections, which was rejected by order dated 24.04.2019 passed by Ld. DM/RO ON NDPC. b. Direct the respondents to comply with the rules laid down under Section 36 (4) & (5) of Representation of People Act, 1951. c. Pass any other order(s) or relief in favour of the... Petitioner and agains...
Ritu Jain vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : May 01, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 1266/2019 RITU JAIN $~56 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA STATE & ANR. versus Represented by: Ms.Anjal J.Manish, Advocate ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC for the State ........ RESPONDENTS MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.9323/2019 Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(Crl.) No.1266/2019 & Crl.M.A.No.9322/2019 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10th April, 2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate which reads as under:-"CC No.530222/2016 Deepak Jain Vs. Shrey Overseas & Ors. 10.4.2019 Present : Complainant in person. Counsel for the accused has filed copy of receipt of cost deposited by them in Delhi High Court Legal Accused is absent. Sh.Ritaj, counsel for the accused. W.P.(Crl.) No.1266/2019 Page 1 of 8 Services Committee in compliance of the order dated 12.03.2019 of Honble High Court of Delhi in a petition filed by them titled a...
Amresh Kumar vs.shri Hari Overseas (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:12. 07.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:01. 05.2019 W.P.(C) 8291/2014 AMRESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan and Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates. Versus SHRI HARI OVERSEAS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop & Mr. Prashant Kumar Mittal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition assails the impugned award dated 02.08.2014 of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX in ID No.12/2013 vide which the statement of claim filed by the petitioner herein directly under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the management of M/s Hari Overseas (P) Limited vide which it was held that the petitioner herein was not entitled to any relief in as much as he was not a workman within the ambit of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and it was also held vide the impugned award that the petitioner had also aban...
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
Raj Kumar Jain & Ors vs.prem Kumar Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(OS) 17/2019 RAJ KUMAR JAIN & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advocates along with appellants no.2 and 4. PREM KUMAR JAIN & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate for respondents no.1 to 5 along with respondents no.1, 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH The present appeal is directed against the order dated 31.07.2018 passed ORDER0105.2019 % by the learned Single Judge of this Court by which a preliminary decree has been passed with respect to the properties, which we detail below: S.No.Description of Property Details of Owner 1.2. 3.4. known Residential House as Verdun with the adjoining land, situated on Mall Road, Mussourie, Uttarakhand tax no.175/17An old Baoli at Rewari (Haryana) Near Anaj Mandi of archaeological importance also known as Solahi Rahi bearing house A Parce...
Sh. Gurmeet Narang & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 01, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2323/2019 & Crl.M.A. 9265/2019 SH. GURMEET NARANG & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Singh Tanwar, Advocate with petitioners in person. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Sukhmender Singh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.251/2009, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 28th January, 2019 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sukhmender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submi...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »