Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Trade and Taxes Delhi vs.super Agencies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
Commissioner of Trade and Taxes Delhi vs.m/s Larsen and Toubro Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
Hori Lal vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 01, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 797/2019 BAIL APPLN. 800/2019 BAIL APPLN. 805/2019 + + + (i) MANISH (ii) SUNNY (iii) HORI LAL Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad & Mr. .....Petitioners Abhishek, Advocates Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned bail applications arise out of FIR No.124/2019, under Sections 308/341/4of IPC registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, Delhi and so these applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.... Petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in aforesaid FIR, while claiming to be innocent. BAIL APPLN. 797/2019 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has referred to the status report. Upon hearing and on perusal of the FIR and the status report, I find tha...
Jatin Parikh vs.whatman International Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:01. t May, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 77/2019, C.M.16043/2019 JATIN PARIKH Through: Mr.Rahul Chitnis and Mr.Atul ..... Appellant versus Mehandru, Advocates WHATMAN INTERNATIONAL LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.Saif Khan and Mr.Shobhit Agrawal, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 01.02.2019 passed on an application being I.A.5235/2018 filed by the plaintiff (respondent herein) under the provisions of Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The defendants in the suit including appellant, who was arrayed as defendant no.4 in the suit, stand convicted. The matter stands adjourned by the learned Single Judge for 02.05.2019 for hearing on the punishment to be awarded.2. The present appeal has been instituted by the appellant, who was defendant no.4 in ...
Symbiosis International & Ors. Vs.all India Council for Technical Educ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~12, 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 7075/2018 & CM APPL. 32223/2018 SYMBIOSIS INTERNATIONAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8389/2018 & CM APPL. 32223/2018 THE GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (GITAM) versus ........ Petitioner ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION (AICTE) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Mr. Krishanu Barua, Advocates in Item 12. Mr. Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Pranjal Saran, Mr. Rudra CVR, Ms. Akanksha Chaudhary, Advocate in Item 13 Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel AICTE with Mr. Abhinav Tyagi Advocate for respondent No.1 in Item 12 to 14. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Mr. Bhaibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate for respondent No.2 UGC in Item 12. Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate for U...
Vikas Trading Co. Vs.the Commissioner, Value Added Tax and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
Manish vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 01, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 797/2019 BAIL APPLN. 800/2019 BAIL APPLN. 805/2019 + + + (i) MANISH (ii) SUNNY (iii) HORI LAL Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad & Mr. .....Petitioners Abhishek, Advocates Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned bail applications arise out of FIR No.124/2019, under Sections 308/341/4of IPC registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, Delhi and so these applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.... Petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in aforesaid FIR, while claiming to be innocent. BAIL APPLN. 797/2019 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has referred to the status report. Upon hearing and on perusal of the FIR and the status report, I find tha...
Krishan Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~36 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"1st May, 2019 Crl.Appeal No.908/2002 KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.M. Singh, Adv. with appellant in person. STATE versus Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This appeal assails the judgment of court of sessions whereby the appellant was held guilty and convicted on charge of attempted armed robbery and possession of a knife and punishment awarded for such offence.2. On 06.10.1997 Sub Inspector Ghanshyam Dass (PW-9), the investigating officer (IO) made an endorsement on the statement (Ex.PW-7/A) of Ramesh Chand Inani (PW-7) and got first information report (FIR) No.523/1997 (Ex.PW-1/A) registered at about 10.10 p.m. in the police station Sarai Rohilla concerning an incident that statedly had occurred at the bus stand of Kishan Kunj on old Rohtak Road, which falls within the jurisdiction of the police station Sarai Rohilla. At the...
Triloki Nath Chaudhary vs.shri Hari Overseas (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:12. 07.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:01. 05.2019 W.P.(C) 8280/2014 TRILOKI NATH CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan and Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates. Versus SHRI HARI OVERSEAS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop & Mr. Prashant Kumar Mittal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition assails the impugned award dated 02.08.2014 of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX in ID No.13/2013 vide which it was held that the petitioner/claimant having failed to prove that he was a workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was thus, not entitled to any relief against the management of M/s Hari Overseas (P) Ltd. i.e. the respondent herein.2. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as a Senior Accountant with the respondent from 06.06.2011 with his last drawn salary being W.P.(C)...
M/S Hans Raj Om Pakash vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »