Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Aslam and Ors vs.jamila Begum and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~OS-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(OS) 301/2017 MOHD. ASLAM AND ORS Date of decision:02. 05.2019 ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Abinash K.Mishra and Mr.Gaurav Kr.Pandey, Advs. with Plaintiffs in person. JAMILA BEGUM AND ORS versus ..... Defendants Through Mr.Ashok Gurnani, Adv. for D-1 to 5 and D-10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.7346/2017 1. This application is filed by the plaintiffs seeking condonation of delay of 194 days in re-filing the suit in the interest of justice.2. The present suit is filed seeking declaration against the defendants that the plaintiffs are the co-owners/joint owners of the suit property and for declaring Hiba dated 03.01.1979 as null and void.3. It is the case of the plaintiffs that knowledge of the Hiba was obtained on 03.12.2013 in another proceedings being CS2062013. In those proceedings, the plaintiffs then filed counter claim on 01.11.2014. Subsequently, with the permission of the court on 19.05.20...
The Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (Gitam) vs.all India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~12, 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 7075/2018 & CM APPL. 32223/2018 SYMBIOSIS INTERNATIONAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 8389/2018 & CM APPL. 32223/2018 THE GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (GITAM) versus ........ Petitioner ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION (AICTE) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Mr. Krishanu Barua, Advocates in Item 12. Mr. Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Pranjal Saran, Mr. Rudra CVR, Ms. Akanksha Chaudhary, Advocate in Item 13 Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel AICTE with Mr. Abhinav Tyagi Advocate for respondent No.1 in Item 12 to 14. Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Mr. Bhaibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate for respondent No.2 UGC in Item 12. Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate for U...
Super Agencies vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
Sunny vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 01, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 797/2019 BAIL APPLN. 800/2019 BAIL APPLN. 805/2019 + + + (i) MANISH (ii) SUNNY (iii) HORI LAL Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad & Mr. .....Petitioners Abhishek, Advocates Versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The above captioned bail applications arise out of FIR No.124/2019, under Sections 308/341/4of IPC registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, Delhi and so these applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.... Petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in aforesaid FIR, while claiming to be innocent. BAIL APPLN. 797/2019 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has referred to the status report. Upon hearing and on perusal of the FIR and the status report, I find tha...
Mukul Kataria (Minor) & Anr vs.ram Bhool & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t May, 2019. CS(OS) 490/2018 & IAs No.13500/2018 (u/O XXXII R-1 CPC), 13501/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 13502/2018 (u/O XI R-14 CPC), 1123/2019 (u/O VIII R-10 CPC) & 3267/2019 (u/O VI R-17 CPC) MUKUL KATARIA (MINOR) & ANR .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv. Versus RAM BHOOL & ANR ...Defendants Through: Mr. C.M. Grover, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The two minor plaintiffs namely Mukul Katariya and Chhavi, acting through their mother Smt. Pinki, have instituted this suit against their paternal grandfather defendant no.1 Ram Bhool and their father defendant no.2 Deepak, for (i) partition of properties No.32 & 33, Gali No.3, Sarojini Naidu Park, Shastri Nagar, Delhi claiming 1/6th share each therein; (ii) rendition of accounts; and, (iii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating, encumbering or parting with possession of the said properties and/or from dispos...
Inderpreet Singh Bhatia vs.ashok Kumar Mehtani & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 227/2019 INDERPREET SINGH BHATIA Through: Mr. Gaurav Bahl, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ASHOK KUMAR MEHTANI & ANR. Through: None. ORDER ..... Defendants % IAs No.6313/2019 & 6314/2019 (both for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 01.05.2019 2. The applications are disposed of. CS(COMM) 227/2019 & IA No.6312/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) 3. The plaintiff has sued for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th August, 2016 by the defendant No.1 Ashok Kumar Mehtani of property No.M-19, Lajpat Nagar-III, New Delhi in favour of the plaintiff.4. For the plaintiff to be entitled to the relief of specific performance, Section 16(c) requires the plaintiff to plead and prove that the plaintiff has always been ready and willing and is ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement. Further, it has been held in (i) Kumar Dhirendra Mullick Vs. Tivoli Park Apartment...
Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
* + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 03.2019 Pronounced on:01. 05.2019 ST.APPL. 5/2017, C.M. Appl. No.36948/2017, 36950/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES, DELHI ........ Petitioner SUPER AGENCIES versus ..... Respondent ST.APPL. 6/2017 COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES DELHI ........ Petitioner M/S INGRAM MICRO INDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL162016, C.M. Appl. No.29580/2016 M/S HANS RAJ OM PAKASH COMMISISONER TRADE & TAXES & ANR. versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent VAT APPEAL172016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus ..... Appellant VAT APPEAL182016 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES VAT APPEAL192016, C.M. Appl. No.31746/2016 GE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT LTD COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES DELHI..... Respondent ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus VAT APPEAL202016, C.M. Appl. No.31751/2016 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD versus ..... Appellant ST. APPL.5/2017 & ...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.m/s Synergy Steels Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 879/2012 & IA19602019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ........ Petitioner Date of Decision :1. t May, 2019 Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Kishore Rawat and Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advs. versus M/S SYNERGY STEELS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankit Jain, Mr.Sachin Jain, Mr.Sarvesh Rai, Ms.Diya Kapoor, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 10.10.2011 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the following three Standard Fire and Special Perils policies (hereinafter referred to as Insurance Policies) taken by the respondent from the petitioner:-"(i) Policy No.360300/11/05/16600091 valid from 20.05.2005 to midnight of 19.05....
Ms. Surabhi Das Sharma and Anr. Vs.ajay Gajanan Joshi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t May, 2019. + CS(OS) 655/2018 and I.A. 17577/2018 MS. SURABHI DAS SHARMA AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Mishal Johari, Advocate. versus AJAY GAJANAN JOSHI ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Defendant has not appeared despite service. No written statement has been filed. It is clear that the Defendant does not wish to defend the present suit.2. The Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for damages and for permanent and mandatory injunction. The Plaintiff No.2 company is engaged in the manufacturing of medical devices and have alliances with various multi-national companies. They are also involved in exporting of products to various countries.3. The various clients of the Plaintiff No.2 include Defence forces, Para-Military Forces and well-known corporations of India such as Indian Airlines, PSUs, as well as ambulance services, etc. The Plaintiff No...
Nikhil Agrawal vs.the University of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:1. t May, 2019 + W.P. (C) 11940/2018 NIKHIL AGRAWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, Adv. versus THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Ms. Slomita Rai, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT Registration, for admissions to Post Graduate (PG) % 1. programmes, being conducted by the University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the University) for the 2018-2019 academic session, was announced, by it, vide Press Release dated 10th May, 2018. The registration process was to commence on 18th May, 2018. In the M.A. (Political Science) Programme, with which the present writ petition is concerned, a total intake of 502 students was declared, out of which 251 seats were to be filled on the basis of an entrance test and 251 seats as per merit in the Undergraduate Programmes. Of the 251 seats to be filled on ...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »