Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivam Singh vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~16 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:30. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6387/2019, C.M.Nos.27198-27200/2019 SHIVAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajay Kohli and Ms.Pooja Vohra, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Atul Goyal, Advocate for R-2/Drugs Control Deptt.) Mr.Yashish Chandra, Mr.Piyush Gaur and Mr.Yashashvi SK Chocksey, Advocates for UOI with Mr.Varun Kumar and Mr.Shashi Kant, DIs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPLs 27199-27200/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 6387/2019 & C.M.27198/2019 (stay) 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be suffering from Cer...
Aman Singh vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 30, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1421/2019 AMAN SINGH Through: Mr. Altaf Hussain, Advocate .....Petitioner Versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Dr. M.P.singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 12070/2019 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 1421/2019... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.86/2019, under Sections 376/354A/506 IPC and Sectionsof The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, registered at police station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi while claiming to be innocent.... Petitioners counsel submits that the story putforth in the FIR is concocted. Attention of this Court is drawn to the order Bail Appln. 1421/2019 Page 1 of 3 of 14th March, 2019 (Annexure-D) vide which bail has been granted to co-accused-Poonam. It is pointed out that in the aforesaid order, it is noted that petitioner was in illicit relationship with mother...
Fuji Litech Co. Ltd. Vs.energy Efficiency Services Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~5, 6 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6123/2019 & CM Appl.26371/2019 + W.P.(C) 6157/2019 & CM Appl.26489/2019 + W.P.(C) 6162/2019 & CM Appl.26499/2019 ATTOTEK CO. LTD. ZAM CO. LTD. FUJI LITECH CO. LTD. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K.Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates versus ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay, Advocate with Mr. Prakash Jha, AGM for EESL Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present three writ petitions raise almost identical issues. The facts are also somewhat common. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, these petitions are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. Respondent No.1 is a joint venture of four National Public Sector W.Ps....
Mahabir Mehto vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:19. 03.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 05.2019 CRL.A.1013/2018 MAHABIR MEHTO STATE versus . Appellant .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Madhav Khurana and Ms. Trisha Mittal, Advocates : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with SI Sunder Singh, PS-Baba Haridas Nagar CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provision of section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) assails the judgment dated 27.04.2018 and the order on sentence dated 14.05.2018, rendered by the learned Additional Session Judge-01, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, in Session Case No.440846/2016, title as State vs. CRL.A. 1013/2018 Page 1 of 29 Mahabir Mehto, emanating from F.I.R No.216/2013 (hereinafter referred to as the subject FIR) under sectionsof the Indian Pena...
Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. Vs.state and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:30. h May, 2019 + 1. CRL.M.C. 3946/2014 & CRL.M.A.13516/2014 1. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE (INDIA) LTD. Colgate Research Centre, Main Street, Hiranandani Gardens, Pawai, Mumbai - 40076.2. MR. NIKET GHATE C/o Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited Colgate Research Centre, Main Street, Hiranandani Gardens, Pawai, Mumbai - 40076.3. R. A. SHAH C/o Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited Colgate Research Centre, Main Street, Hiranandani Gardens, Pawai, Mumbai - 40076.4. DINESH CASTELLINO C/o Cummins India Ltd., Kochrud, Pune - 411038.5. AMEYA JOSHI C/o Johnson & Johnson, 30, Spencers Building, Near Bhatia Hospital, Foriett Street, Tardeo, Mumbai - 40036.6. S. Y. PRABHU C/o Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited Colgate Research Centre, Main Street, Hiranandani Gardens, Pawai, Mumbai - 40076. ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Siddharth Luthra & Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Saif Khan, Mr. Achutam Sreekumar, Mr. Akshay Agarwal, Mr. ...
M/S Icici Bank Ltd vs.bhawana Tomar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~22 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:30. 05.2019 F.A.O.No.230/2019 M/S ICICI BANK LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla, Advocate. Versus BHAWANA TOMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) ....Respondent C.M. No.27122/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. F.A.O. No.230/2019 1. The impugned order dated 20.05.2019 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-01, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ADJ) in Civil Suit No.745/2019 by which an advocate was appointed as a receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC to repossess the vehicle in question with liberty to deposit the same with the concerned SHO and make a report to the court, is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal.2. The appellant/plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery of Rs.4,33,481.83 against the respondent on the ground that they have FAO No.230/2019 Page 1 of 4 disbursed a loan amount of Rs.3,95,000/- on interest to the...
Dr. Ankita Baidya vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2019 + CM APPL. 13354/2019 in W.P.(C) 8748/2018 % 1. DR. ANKITA BAIDYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. K. Dubey, Mr. Udit Malik and Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Mukesh Pandey and Mr. Saravan Kumar, Advs. Mr. Dushyant Parashar Adv. for R-2/AIIMS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This application, at the instance of the petitioner Dr. Ankita Baidya, in the writ petition is, essentially, a follow up to the judgment, dated 1st February, 2019, rendered by me in W.P.(C) 8748/2018.2. The controversy, in the writ petition, which stands decided by me in the aforesaid judgment dated 1st February, 2019, essentially dealt with the justification of the decision, of the AIIMS, to extend the course of D.M. (Infectious Disease) course, which was being undertaken by the petitioner, by six month...
Attotek Co. Ltd. Vs.energy Efficiency Services Limited and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~5, 6 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6123/2019 & CM Appl.26371/2019 + W.P.(C) 6157/2019 & CM Appl.26489/2019 + W.P.(C) 6162/2019 & CM Appl.26499/2019 ATTOTEK CO. LTD. ZAM CO. LTD. FUJI LITECH CO. LTD. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K.Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Aditya Chhibber and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates versus ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERVICES LIMITED AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay, Advocate with Mr. Prakash Jha, AGM for EESL Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present three writ petitions raise almost identical issues. The facts are also somewhat common. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, these petitions are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.2. Respondent No.1 is a joint venture of four National Public Sector W.Ps....
Shiv Charan Verma vs.pramod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
$~39 & 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2019 CRL.REV.P. 275/2017 CRL.REV.P. 276/2017 SHIV CHARAN VERMA versus PRAMOD KUMAR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Lal Singh Thakur with Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, Advocates with petitioner in person For the Respondent : Mr. Pawan Kumar Jakhu, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CRL.REV.P. 275/2017 & Crl.M.(Bail) 670/2017 (for suspension of sentence), Crl.M.A.11812/2019 cost) & CRL.REV.P. 276/2017 & Crl.M.(Bail) 672/2017 (for suspension of sentence), Crl.M.A.11811/2019 (for waiver of cost) (for waiver of 1.... Petitioner impugns judgments dated 21.03.2017, whereby, the appeals of the petitioner, impugning orders on conviction dated 04.11.2015 and orders on sentence dated 20.11.2015, have been dismissed. CRL.REV.P. 275/2017 & CRL.REV.P. 276/2017 Page 1 of 4 2.....
Court on Its Own Motion vs.re: Mehmood Pracha Advocate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
2 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL.) 4/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate as Amicus Curiae with Ms. Manvi Priya and Mr. Sajeevi Seshadri, Advocates. versus RE: MEHMOOD PRACHA ADVOCATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advocate with Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocates for respondent with respondent in person. % Date of Decision:30. h May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present contempt case has been registered on the basis of reference dated 5th April 2019, received by the Registrar General of this Court from the Principal Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as C.A.T.), extracting inter alia the order dated 29th March, 2019 passed by the Principal Bench, C.A.T., New Delhi in O.A. 100/2413/2016 in the case of Sanjeev Chaturvedi Vs. Cabinet Secretariat Page...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »