Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak Tank vs.m/s Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd vs.manoj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
M/S Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd vs.sumit Kumar Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
Medirad Tech India Limited & Anr vs.technology Development Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 17/2015 & IA63692018 MEDIRAD TECH INDIA LIMITED & ANR......... Petitioners Date of Decision :2. d May, 2019 Through: Mr.Sanjay Katyal, Mr.S.K.Dwivedi, Advs. versus TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sarul Jain, Mr.Jeevesh Ms.Cassandra Mehta, Zosangliani, Ms.Jinuma Barman, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 25.06.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Loan Agreement dated 30.08.2000 and the Supplementary Agreement dated 05.05.2005 executed between the parties.2. The respondent/Technology Development Board has been constituted by the Government of India under the provisions of the O.M.P.(COMM) N...
Ashutosh Rathi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 3104/2018 & Crl. M.A. 50810/2018 ASHUTOSH RATHI versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. M. Rais Farooqui, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.No.333/2018 under Section 406 of the IPC, Police Station Mayur Vihar, Delhi.2. As per the complainant, he wanted to purchase a car and accordingly approached the petitioner, who is related to him and gave him Rs. 80,000/- in cash and also stated that he already had Rs. 2 lakhs of the complainant. The deal was struck at Rs. 4 lakhs for a Swift Dzire. It is contended that despite payment of money, the vehicle was not transferred in the name of the complainant. BAIL APPLN.3104/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Le...
Harvinder Singh Tokas & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 02, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2362/2019 HARVINDER SINGH TOKAS & ANR. Through: Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Vikas Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 9385/2019 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2362/2019 Quashing FIR No.838/2015, under Sections of 406/420/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Dwarka South, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 29th April, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits on instructions that there is no forgery angle in the FIR case Crl.M.C. 2362/2019 Page 1 of 3 in question. He submit...
S. Sadachari Sai Baba Om Ji vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 4515/2019 & CM No.20101/2019 (Stay) Date of Decision:2. d May, 2019. IN THE MATTER OF: S. SADACHARI SAI BABA OM JI .....Petitioner Through : Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Saif, Advs. with petitioner in person Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through : Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Adv. for R-3 Mr. P. R. Chopra, Adv. for R-4 &5 Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP for CBI with Mr. Philomon Kani & Ms. Kriti Handa, Advs. For R-11 and R-14 to 19. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 80A of the Representation of People Act, 1951 seeking the following prayers: (I) To quash the order dated 07.06.2016 qua petitioner at Sr.No.17; (II) also to quash the order dated 24.04.2019 passed by the respondent no.5; (III) to direct the respondent no.5 to accept the all nomination papers as valid filed by the petitioner on 22.04.2019 and also permit the petitioner to con...
M/S Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd vs.deepak Tank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
Campos Brothers Farms vs.matru Bhumi Supply Chain Pvt. Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) 1/2017 & IA No.680-681/2017, 5164- 5167/2017, 5169/2017, 5171/2017, 7939/2017, 7957/2017, 12465/2017, 12471/2017, 12503/2017 & 12533/2017 Reserved on:14. 12.2018 Date of decision :02. 05.2019 CAMPOS BROTHERS FARMS ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Mr.Siddhant Kr. Singh, Mr.Raghav Wadhwa, Mr.Anurag Sahay & Ms.Mallika Bhatia, Advs. versus MATRU BHUMI SUPPLY CHAIN PVT. LIMITED & ORS. ..... Judgment Debtors Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Sulabh Rewari, Mr.Kaustav Saha & Ms.Drishti Harpalani, Advs. for R- 1, R-3 to R-9 Mr.Amit Agrawal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 48 and 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking enforcement of a Foreign Award dated 25.07.2016 passed by the Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration Rules of Combined Edible Nut Trade Association (CENTA), now known as Th...
Karans Gurukul Classes & Ors vs.gurukul Classes Iit Division & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d May, 2019. CS(COMM) 10/2018, IA No.131/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.5045/2018 (u/O XIIA CPC) & IA No.15098/2018 (u/S124of the Trade Marks Act, 1999) KARANS GURUKUL CLASSES & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manish Biala & Mr. Ashutosh Upadhyaya, Advs. Versus GURUKUL CLASSES IIT DIVISION & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra & Ms. Srijan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Uppal, Advs. The plaintiff no.1 Karans Gurukul Classes, a partnership of plaintiffs 1. no.2&3 Hemant Kumar and Manish Kumar, has sued the defendant no.1 Gurukul Classes IIT Division, a partnership of defendants no.2&3 Pradip Giri and Dipak Giri, for permanent injunction restraining infringement of the device trade mark GURUKUL CLASSES and passing off by the defendants of their same business as that of the plaintiffs by adopting the mark GURUKUL CLASSES IIT DIVISION and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit was entertained, thou...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »