Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Akram Ali vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 02, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 155/2019 AKRAM ALI Through: Mr. Sunil Kr. Bhatt and Ms. Manju .....Petitioner Versus Datt, Advocates STATE & ANR Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Hemant Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Advocate with respondent/complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.203/2016, under Sections 377/232/506 of IPC, registered at police station Vasant Kunj, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 9th January, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Hemant, on the basis of identity proof produced by her...
Savita vs.m/s Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
M/S Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd vs.subhash Kumar Ray & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
Rohit Chaturvedi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 836/2019 Judgment delivered on:02. 05.2019 ROHIT CHATURVEDI ........ Petitioner % + versus ..... Respondent STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Vinay Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms.Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ajay Singh, P.S.Paharganj. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.228/2017 under Section 376/328/506 IPC, Police Station Paharganj.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix came into contact with the petitioner through social media and thereafter on the pretext of getting her employment he called her to a hotel. It is alleged that certain amounts were transferred to his account and also some cash was given. Thereafter it is alleged that on 06.03.2017 he caller her to Delhi for the purposes of a job interview. He took her to a hotel alleging her to be his wife. The...
M/S Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd vs.amit Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
M/S Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd vs.shah Alam & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
Bhoopendra Kumar vs.university of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ 44 to 47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3824/2017 & CM APPL. 16824/2017 + W.P.(C) 4827/2017 & CM APPLs. 20831/2017, 11610/2018 + W.P.(C) 2221/2018 + W.P.(C) 3881/2018 & CM APPL. 15310/2018 RAID HOODA AMIT KUMAR BHOOPENDRA KUMAR SURAT SINGH Through: Mr. R. K. Saini, Adv. with Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr.Hardik Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioners were admitted to the LL.B. course of the University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the University) in the year 2006-07. Six years of the said course were completed by the petitioners, in 2012.2. The petitioners were, however, able to pass only twenty six, out of thirty papers constituting the said course, within the said six years. W.P.(C) 3824/2017 & othe...
Kishan Anand & Anr vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 02, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2368/2019 & CRL.M.A. 9404/2019 KISHAN ANAND & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rahul Kumar Mr. A.S. Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 2376/2019 & CRL.M.A. 9463/2019 DARSHAN LAL & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. A.S. Sharma, Advocate. Versus THE STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rahul Kumar Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate with Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in person. Crl.M.C. 2368/2019 & Crl.M.C. 2376/2019 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 741/2016 under Sections 323/354-B/451/506/5of IPC and FIR No.742/2016 under Sections 323/324/354/5of IPC both registered at Police Station Shakarpur, East ...
M/S Prinkle Construction Company vs.the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~11-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + + Judgment delivered on:02. 05.2019 MAC.APP. 1005/2018 & CM No.47533/2018 MAC.APP. 1008/2018 & CM No.47666/2018 MAC.APP. 1009/2018 & CM Nos.47678-79/2018 MAC.APP. 1011/2018 & CM No.47712/2018 M/S PRINKLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya and Mr. Priyanshu Malik, Advocates. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the recovery proceedings through the SDM are at an advanced stage and the appellant apprehends precipitate action against it any day, for the recovery of 50% of the impugned amount. Thereafter, a stay of the impugned order is sought.2. The appellant is owner of two trucks. Both were plying on a public road, one ahead of the other. At some stage, the smaller motor vehicle plying in between the said two trucks was cru...
Indian Potash Ltd. Vs.media Contents and Communication Services (India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d May, 2019 10th April, 2019 CS(OS) No.1717/2007 INDIAN POTASH LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Ms. Saumya Gupta & Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advs. Versus MEDIA CONTENTS AND COMMUNICATION SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Davesh Bhatia & Mr. Kamal Taneja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has sued the defendants Media Contents & Communication Services (India) Pvt. Ltd and The Editor, Star News for recovery of damages of Rs.11 crores for defamation, pleading that (i) the plaintiff is a joint sector company under the administrative control of the Department of Fertilizers, Union Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers; (ii) over 90% of the equity of the plaintiff company is held by government funded State Cooperative ventures and Public Sector Companies; (iii) the plain...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »