Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Leyland Ltd. Vs.delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~34. * + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 394/2018 Date of decision:3. d May, 2019 ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amir Sigh Pasrich, Mr. Kalyan Arambam & Mr. Amit Ranjan Singh, Advocates. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, 1996 Act) wherein several interim reliefs have been sought. 1.1 It is pertinent to note that the arbitration proceedings are ongoing and they are, I am told, at the stage of recording of evidence. It may also be relevant to note that upon the demise of Honble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha, the Presiding Arbitrator, the Arbitral Tribunal has been reconstituted and is presently helmed by Honble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri, former judge, Supreme Court of India. The other Members being Honb...
The Chairman Central Pollution Control Board & Ors vs.nain Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 04.2019. Date of Decision:03. 05.2019. + W.P.(C) 1915/2016 THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ORS Through: Mr.Saqib, adv. ........ Petitioners versus NAIN SINGH & ANR Through: R-1 in person. ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 The present writ petition under Articlesof the Constitution of India assails the order dated 08.09.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in OA No.3369/2013. The Tribunal, vide the impugned order, has allowed the OA filed by the respondent no.1 herein and directed the petitioner to pay the difference of emoluments for the period during which the respondent No.1 had performed the duties of W.P.(C) 1915/2016 Page 1 of 10 the higher post of Finance and Accounts Officer.2. The respondent no.1 (hereinafter referred to as respondent), having joined the petitioner Central Poll...
Ashok Kumar Garg vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~14. * + % W.P.(C) 4609/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 05.2019 ASHOK KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Khemka with Mr. Daksh Rathore, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.20508/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4609/2019 & C.M. No.20507/2019 W.P.(C.) No.4609/2019 Page 1 of 8 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 25.01.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.1729/2018. The petitioners said Original Application has been dismissed by the Tribunal. The petitioner had assailed the initiation of departmental proceedings against him on the premise that the same had not been instituted within a period of 4 years of the event in ...
Saddam Ansari vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 03, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2413/2019 & CRL.M.A. 9543/2019 SADDAM ANSARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh K.Chandna, Advocate. Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Usman Ali. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.36/2017, under Sections 363 of IPC, registered at Police Station Anand Parbat, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 1st May, 2019 of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 present in the Court, are the complainants/first-informant of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by SI Usman Ali, on the basis of identity proof produced by them...
Haaris Rasheed & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 109/2019 & C.M. Nos.618/2019, 11454/2019, 11597/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 Judgment reserved on:16. 04.2019 HIMANSHU KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocates with Mr.Parmatma Singh, Mr.Madhur Jain, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Ms.Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Shailesh Madiyal & Mr. Debasish Raut, Advs R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. + W.P.(C) 862/2019 & CM APPL. 3903-3905/2019 HAARIS RASHEED & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankur Khandelwal, Mr.Utkarsh Sharma, Mr.Gowrang, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Mr.Shailesh Madiyal, Mr.Debasish Raut, Advs for R-1,2 & 3. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. W.P.(C.) Nos.109/2019, 862/2019, 864/2019 & 869/2019 ...
Dinesh Gautam vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2714/2018 DINESH GAUTAM versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Nakul Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Arti Singh, PS Hauz Khas. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.139/2018, U/S. 376/377/5Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S. Hauz Qazi.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner came in contact with the complainant in the year 2014 and thereafter is alleged to have made physical relations forcibly. It is alleged that petitioner used to take the prosecutrix to his house and would send his children out of the house and then forcibly make physical relationship.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner BAIL APPLN.2714/2018 Page 1 of 3 has been falsely implica...
Syniverse Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.telecom Regulatory Authori ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~28 & 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:3. d May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1507/2018 SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus + W.P.(C) 1508/2018 M/S MNP INDERCONNECTION TELECOM SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. Present: Mr.Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vishal Binod, Ms.Samykya Mukku & Mr. Amir Nabi, Advs. for the... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 1507/2018. Mr.Meet Malhotra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Neerav Merchant, Ms.Ujjal Banerjee & Mr.Akash Khurana, Advocates for the... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 1508/2018. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr.Sayandeep Pahari, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K.R. Sasi Prabhu, Mr. Hiten Sampath, Mr.Biju P. & Mr. Aditya Shandilya, Advs. for the Review... Petitioner/ Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRA...
Ram Swaroop Singh vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~43 to 45 * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 11/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 18/2019 CRL.A. 126/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 224/2019, Crl.M.A. 2633/2019 CRL.A. 163/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 287/2019 SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA RAM KISHAN RAM SWAROOP SINGH Through: .....Appellants Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah & Mr. Siddhant Kaushik, Advocates in Crl.A. 11/2019. Mr. Amit Khanna, Ms. Preeti Singh & Mr. Pushkar Katyal, Advocates in Crl.A. 126/2019. Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate in Crl.A. 163/2019. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % 03.05.2019 Crl.M.(B) 18/2019 Crl.M.(B) 224/2019 Crl.M.(B) 287/2019 The applications for suspension of sentence of appellants-Surinder Kumar Gupta, Ram Kishan & Ram Swaroop Narang have been heard. CRL.A.11/2019 & connected matters Page 1 Appellant-Surinder Kumar Gupta has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonme...
Balraj Singh Dhir vs.m/s Cyfuture India Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA732019 & CM APPL. 5152/2019 Reserved on:26. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d May, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus SUMIT KUMAR SHARMA M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA252019 & CM APPL.1766/2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus MANOJ SHARMA CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aditya K.Choudhary with Mr.Gurmehar Vaan Singh & Mr.Amit Pratap, Advocates for R1. Mr.Saket Sikri with Mr.Ajay Pal Singh & Ms.Ritu Parna, Advocates for MTNL. + LPA312019 & CM APPL.2135/2019 TARUN KUMAR LPA No.73/2019 & other connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 of 31 Through: Mr.Manish K.Bishnoi, Advocate. versus M/S CYFUTURE INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ad...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »