Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vinit Gupta vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 309/2019 & Crl. M. (Bail) 232/2019 VINIT GUPTA versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State Mr. Varun Mishra and Mr. Anish Sharma, Adv. for complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.20/2018 under Sections 498-A/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar. Subsequently Section 377 IPC has been added.2.... Petitioner is the husband of the complainant/prosecutrix. Subject dispute emanates out of a matrimonial discord.3. By order dated 06.02.2019, parties were referred to mediation. Parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation BAIL APPLN. 309/2019 Page 1 of 3 and settlement dated 29.0...
N v vs.a V
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:20. 03.2019 Judgment pronounced on:03. .05.2019 + MAT.APP(F.C.) 12/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate versus Through: ..... Respondent In person N V A V CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 5.10.2017 passed by the Family Court in HMA No.950/2014 whereby the petition under Section 13(1)(ia), (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) filed by the appellant/wife for dissolution of marriage has been dismissed.2. The relevant facts necessary for the present appeal are that the parties got married on 02.07.2003 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at Delhi. After the marriage both the parties resided together at Delhi. Marriage was consummated and one son named Harshit was born from the wedlock on 05.04.2004. MAT.APP(F.C.)12/2018 Page 1 of 19 3. Disputes and dif...
Dheeraj Gera & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 03, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2377/2019 DHEERAJ GERA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jagjit Sahni, Advocate. Versus STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Arun Ahlawat. Mr. Sarthak Katyal, Advocate with Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.203/2017, under Sections 288/304-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, Shahdara Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 1st May, 2019 of respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and on the ground that the incident in question was purely accidental. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos. 2 & 3 present in the Court, are the complainants/first-informant of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by SI Arun Ahlawat, on the basis of identity proof produced by them. Crl.M.C. 2377/2019 Page 1 o...
Ajay Gandhi and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 109/2019 & C.M. Nos.618/2019, 11454/2019, 11597/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 Judgment reserved on:16. 04.2019 HIMANSHU KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocates with Mr.Parmatma Singh, Mr.Madhur Jain, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Ms.Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Shailesh Madiyal & Mr. Debasish Raut, Advs R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. + W.P.(C) 862/2019 & CM APPL. 3903-3905/2019 HAARIS RASHEED & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankur Khandelwal, Mr.Utkarsh Sharma, Mr.Gowrang, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Mr.Shailesh Madiyal, Mr.Debasish Raut, Advs for R-1,2 & 3. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. W.P.(C.) Nos.109/2019, 862/2019, 864/2019 & 869/2019 ...
Vijay Kumar Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2804/2018 VIJAY KUMAR SINGH versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Anuj, PS Crime Branch. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.163 of 2018 under Section 420/468/471 of the IPC, P.S. Crime Branch.2. Allegations are that one Pappu Yadav, the co-accused, had promised to secure job in a Government Corporation for which he asked for Rs.3 lakhs. Part of the amount was deposited in his account and part of the amount was deposited in the account of the petitioner. As per the investigation, approximately Rs.1,55,000/- has been deposited in the account of the petitioner 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely imp...
M/S Mnp Inderconnection Telecom Solutions India Private Limited vs.tel ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~28 & 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:3. d May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1507/2018 SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus + W.P.(C) 1508/2018 M/S MNP INDERCONNECTION TELECOM SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. Present: Mr.Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vishal Binod, Ms.Samykya Mukku & Mr. Amir Nabi, Advs. for the... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 1507/2018. Mr.Meet Malhotra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Neerav Merchant, Ms.Ujjal Banerjee & Mr.Akash Khurana, Advocates for the... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 1508/2018. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr.Sayandeep Pahari, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr.K.R. Sasi Prabhu, Mr. Hiten Sampath, Mr.Biju P. & Mr. Aditya Shandilya, Advs. for the Review... Petitioner/ Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRA...
Pradeep Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2407/2019 PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS. Date of Order: May 03, 2019 .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kali Charan, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vinit Kumar Mr. Parvesh Chaudhary, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.493/2014, under Sections 341/354- A/504/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 27th November, 2017 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Vinit Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the differences between the parties have been amicably res...
Disposafe Health and Life Care Ltd. And Anr. Vs.hindustan Syringes & M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 02.2019 Pronounced on:03. 05.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 269/2018, CAV10742018 & C.M. APPL. 48680-48681/2018 DISPOSAFE HEALTH & LIFE CARE LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Versus HINDUSTAN SYRINGES & MEDICAL DEVICES LTD . .... Respondent FAO(OS) (COMM) 272/2018, CAV10792018 & C.M. Appl. 48934-48935/2018 DISPOSAFE HEALTH & LIFE LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Versus RAJIV NATH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Daswani, Mr. Soham Kumar, Mr. Aisvary Vikram and Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Advocates Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Ms. V. Mohini, Mr. Udayvir Rana, Advocate in FAO(OS) (Comm) 269/2018 & 272/2018 FAO (OS)(COMM) 269/2018 & 272/2018 Page 1 of 29 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This judgment will dispose of two appeals; FAO (OS) (Comm) 272/2018 is preferred by Disposafe Health & Lifeca...
Supreme Court Bar Cooperative vs.registrar Cooperative Societies & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~18 * + % W.P.(C) 4706/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 05.2019 SUPREME COURT BAR COOPERATIVE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D.K. Rustogi with Mr. Akshit Rastogi, Advs. versus REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC with Mr. Shashank Tiwari, Ms. Shivangi Singh and Mr. Rishabh Oswal, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon and Ms. Mamta Tandon, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.20893/2019 W.P.(C.) No.4706/2019 Page 1 of 7 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4706/2019 & C.M. No.20892/2019 2. At the outset, it has been made clear to learned counsels that one of us (Vipin Sanghi, J) is a member of the petitioner society. Neither of the counsels have an objection to this Bench hearing the matter.3. The petitioner co-operative society...
Navneet Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 03, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2395/2019 NAVNEET KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. Through: Ms. Rashmi Singla, Advocate. .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Seema. Mr. Tanvir Alam & Mr. B.C. Tyagi, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.69/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Dwarka North, New Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 22nd February, 2018 (Annexure-C) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by W/SI Seema on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2395/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »