Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D K vs.s
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI D K S Reserved on:6. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:3. d May, 2019 MAT.APP (F.C.) 97/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Bharat Bhushan, Advocate. versus $~ * % + Through: Mr.Basant Gupta, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.MAT.APP(F.C.) 97/2017 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband assailing the order of the Family Court dated 22.04.2017 whereby the petition filed by the husband under Section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) has been dismissed by the Family Court.2. Brief and necessary facts for adjudication of the appeal are that the marriage between the parties were solemnized on 20.01.2003 at Delhi according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. After the marriage the parties cohabited at Rohtak, a daughter namely Vanshika was born out of the wedlock on 22.11.2004. MAT. APP (F.C.) 97/2017 Page 1 of 18 3. T...
Surender Kumar Gupta vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~43 to 45 * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 11/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 18/2019 CRL.A. 126/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 224/2019, Crl.M.A. 2633/2019 CRL.A. 163/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 287/2019 SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA RAM KISHAN RAM SWAROOP SINGH Through: .....Appellants Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah & Mr. Siddhant Kaushik, Advocates in Crl.A. 11/2019. Mr. Amit Khanna, Ms. Preeti Singh & Mr. Pushkar Katyal, Advocates in Crl.A. 126/2019. Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate in Crl.A. 163/2019. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % 03.05.2019 Crl.M.(B) 18/2019 Crl.M.(B) 224/2019 Crl.M.(B) 287/2019 The applications for suspension of sentence of appellants-Surinder Kumar Gupta, Ram Kishan & Ram Swaroop Narang have been heard. CRL.A.11/2019 & connected matters Page 1 Appellant-Surinder Kumar Gupta has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonme...
Disposafe Health and Life Ltd. And Ors. Vs.rajiv Nath and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 02.2019 Pronounced on:03. 05.2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 272/2018, CAV10792018 & C.M. Appl. 48934-48935/2018 DISPOSAFE HEALTH & LIFE LTD & ORS ..... Appellants versus RAJIV NATH & ANR Counsel for the petitioner: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Daswani, Mr. Soham Kumar, Mr. Aisvary Vikram and Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Advocates Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Ms. V. Mohini, Mr. Udayvir Rana, Advocate in FAO(OS) (Comm) 269/2018 & 272/2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % The appeal is partly allowed with no order as to costs. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 03.05.2019 in FAO(OS)(COMM) 269/2018 may be referred to. MAY3 2019 S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) PRATEEK JALAN (JUDGE) FAO (OS)(COMM) 272/2018 Page 1 of 1...
Namita Singh vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1702017 Judgment reserved on:01. 10.2018 Judgment delivered on:3. May, 2019 NAMITA SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv with Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Mr. Abhishek Pandey and Mr. Brijpal Singh, Advs. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs for University of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 01.12.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal are that the appellant applied for the post of Assistant Professor, Department of History with the respondent No.2/College on 17.02.2014. The advertisement was republished on 28.04.2015. Post the subsequent publication of the advertisement, the respondent No.2 published a list of candidates who were shor...
Dhara Singh @ Nakul & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 03, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2389/2019 & CRL.M.A. 9495/2019 DHARA SINGH @ NAKUL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Brij Bhushan Tyagi, Mr. Bhavtosh Sharma & Mr.Rishi Tyagi, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Manoj Kumar. Mr. Pankaj Mohan, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.675/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Amar Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 18th August, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Manoj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2389/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, pr...
Pclit Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mtech Solutions
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI5 Judgement Reserved on:30. h April, 2019 Judgement pronounced on:03. d May,2019 + FAO(OS) 244/2015 PCLIT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. Through: Ms. Rishi Mittal, Advocate ....Appellant versus MTECH SOLUTIONS ....Respondent Through: Mr. Avneesh Garg and Mr.M.P.Singh Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 This is an appeal filed by the appellant under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules against the order dated 31.10.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.647/2013 by which the objections filed by the appellant to the award dated 22.08.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator stand rejected.2. Before the rival submissions of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties can be considered, we deem it appropriate to set out the basic facts which led to the dispute b...
Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 109/2019 & C.M. Nos.618/2019, 11454/2019, 11597/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 Judgment reserved on:16. 04.2019 HIMANSHU KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocates with Mr.Parmatma Singh, Mr.Madhur Jain, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Ms.Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Shailesh Madiyal & Mr. Debasish Raut, Advs R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. + W.P.(C) 862/2019 & CM APPL. 3903-3905/2019 HAARIS RASHEED & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rajshekhar Rao with Mr.Ankur Khandelwal, Mr.Utkarsh Sharma, Mr.Gowrang, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG and Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Mr.Shailesh Madiyal, Mr.Debasish Raut, Advs for R-1,2 & 3. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv for R-4. W.P.(C.) Nos.109/2019, 862/2019, 864/2019 & 869/2019 ...
Kanhaie Jha @ Kishan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 823/2019 KANHAIE JHA @ KISHAN versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Omkar Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Anuj Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.234/2017 under Sections 392/3of the IPC read with Sections 27/of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar.2. It is submitted that the charge has been framed against the petitioner under Sections 392/395/4and no charge under the Arms Act has been framed against the petitioner.3. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had gone to make certain recoveries of money for his business and had received BAIL APPLN. 823/2019 Page 1 of 3 Rs. 11 lakhs from his customers and when he was coming back on his scooty, ...
Flipkart Internet Private Limited vs.flipkartwinnerdraw.com & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
4 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 117/2019 & I.As. 3268/2019 AND32702019 FLIPKART INTERNET PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Vaarish K. Salwani, Advocate with Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus FLIPKARTWINNERDRAW.COM & ORS. Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate for defendant No.24. Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Advocate for defendants No.26 and 27. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:03. d May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN,J (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for infringement of trademark, passing off etc. against the defendants. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"42. In light of the foregoing, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: i. Pass an order and decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant Nos.1 to 16 (and such other websites/entities which are discovered during the course of the proceedings to have been engaging in infringing the Plaintiffs trademark rights), their o...
Ram Kishan vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~43 to 45 * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 11/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 18/2019 CRL.A. 126/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 224/2019, Crl.M.A. 2633/2019 CRL.A. 163/2019 & Crl.M.(B) 287/2019 SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA RAM KISHAN RAM SWAROOP SINGH Through: .....Appellants Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hrishikesh Baruah & Mr. Siddhant Kaushik, Advocates in Crl.A. 11/2019. Mr. Amit Khanna, Ms. Preeti Singh & Mr. Pushkar Katyal, Advocates in Crl.A. 126/2019. Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate in Crl.A. 163/2019. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % 03.05.2019 Crl.M.(B) 18/2019 Crl.M.(B) 224/2019 Crl.M.(B) 287/2019 The applications for suspension of sentence of appellants-Surinder Kumar Gupta, Ram Kishan & Ram Swaroop Narang have been heard. CRL.A.11/2019 & connected matters Page 1 Appellant-Surinder Kumar Gupta has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonme...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »