Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Arun Tejwani & Ors vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 06, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2452/2019 & CRL.M.As. 9704-9705/2019 SHRI ARUN TEJWANI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukesh Hooda & Ms. Sangita Jain, Advocates Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Harender Singh. Mr. S.N. Sharma, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.897/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 8th February, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Harender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C. 2452/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respo...
Shabnam Sikand vs.geeta Sikand & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h May, 2019 CS(OS) 242/2019 SHABNAM SIKAND ..... Plaintiff Through: Dr. Surat Singh and Ms. Vandana Kumari, Advs. GEETA SIKAND & ANR. Through: None. Versus ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.6552/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) 242/2019 & IAs No.6550/2019 (u/O XI R-1 CPC) & 6551/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) 3. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for (i) partition of property No.8, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, claiming 1/4th share therein; (ii) declaration as null and void of the Relinquishment Deed dated 6th October, 2015 executed by Vikram Sikand, husband of the plaintiff, of his share in the property; (iii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from creating any third party right or parting with physical possession of the property; and, (iv) mandatory injunction directing the defendants to restore the ...
Satyam Kumar Sah & Ors. Vs.narcotic Control Bureau (Ncb)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 05.2019 CRL.REV.P. 271/2016 & Crl.M.A.5484/2016 (stay) SATYAM KUMAR SAH & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU (NCB) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar Ranjan, Advocate for petitioner No.2. For the Respondent : Mr. Rajesh Manchanda, Advocate for NCB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 16.03.2016, whereby, an application of the respondent Narcotic Control Bureau under Section 65 Indian Evidence Act, 1872, was allowed by the Trial Court.2. Subject application was filed contending that some relevant files, which were required for the purposes of prosecution, have been misplaced and permission was sought to lead secondary evidence. Trial Court allowed the said application by the impugned judgment.3. Aggrieved by the order allowing the applications, subject...
M vs.A
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
$~ * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h May, 2019 C.R.P. 101/2016 M A Through: Mr. Ashish Sehrawat, Advocate ........ Petitioner petitioner in person versus Through: Mr. V. Shukla, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the order dated 29th February, 2016 whereby the learned Family Court allowed the respondent to withdraw the divorce petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/-.2. The parties were married according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 04th November, 2009 and they stayed together till 11th May, 2013. The petitioner filed a complaint against the respondent in CAW Cell on 27th May, 2013. The police registered FIR No.617/2013 against the petitioner on 13th November, 2013 under Sections 498-A and 406 of Indian Penal Code.3. On 24th July, 2013, the respondent filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rites u...
Reliance Home Finance Limited vs.jagwati Jain and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 974/2018 & I.As. 2408/2019, 2627/2019, 2628/2019, 3974/2019 RELIANCE HOME FINANCE LIMITED Date of decision:6. h May, 2019 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sacchar, Ms. Sunanda Tulsyan, Advocates along with Mr. Mayank (M- 9891105069) Chawla, AR versus JAGWATI JAIN AND OTHERS ..... Defendant for D-4 Through: Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Jain (II) (M-9871877755). Mr. Randhir Jain & Mr. Dhananjai Jain, Advocates (M- 9560562050) Mr. Abhas Kumar, Advocate for D-6 (M-9910425958). Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Olson (M- 8860750431) Mr. Umesh Suri, Mr. Avinash Suri, Advocates (M- 9810424804) for Applicants. Advocate Nair, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Mr. Abhas Kumar, Ld. counsel submits that Mr. Pankaj Jain Defendant No.6 is absconding and he seeks discharge from this matter. Accordingly, Mr. Abhas Kumar is discharged. CS(COMM) 974/2018 Page 1 of 9 2. The present suit for recovery of...
Pravesh Dixit @ Tinda vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851/2017 Reserved on:4. h August, 2018 Pronounced on:6. h May, 2019 PRAVESH DIXIT @ TINDA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI A. Negi, PS Dwarka South CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The appellant Pravesh Dixit @ Tinda stands convicted, vide judgment dated 23rd February, 2017, under Sections 367 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC) and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, having been found guilty of subjecting a child, 17 years and 4 months of age (who would be referred to, hereinafter, as X), to penetrative sexual assault. Consequent thereto, the appellant has, vide subsequent order dated 27th April, 2017, been sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI), for commission of the offence punishable under Section 4 of the POCS...
Eisai Co. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.satish Reddy & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. h May, 2019 CS(COMM) 1169/2018 & I.As. 13934/2018, 15885/2018 EISAI CO. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Archana Sanker, Mr.Dhruv Anand, Ms.Vidisha Garg, Ms.Udita Patro and Mr.Nischay Mall, Advocates for plaintiffs versus SATISH REDDY & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal, Ms.Sneha Jain, Mr.Devvrat Joshi, Mr.Amitavo Mitra and Ms.Garima Sawhney, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA I.A. 13934/2018 JUDGMENT1 The plaintiffs have instituted this suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from manufacturing, selling, distributing, exporting or offering for sale of any product that infringes the plaintiffs patent No.215528 including Lorcaserin or any of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts including Lorcaserin Hydrochloride (hereinafter referred to as LH) and Lorcaserin Hydrochloride Hemihydrate (hereinafter re...
Rakesh Kumar Verma vs.jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h April, 2019 Pronounced on:3. d May, 2019 + LPA1592018 RAKESH KUMAR VERMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Ms. Deepanshi and Mr. Shivendra Singh, Advocates. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing counsel with Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Harsh Ahuja and Mr. Praveen Singh, Advocates for JNU. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15th March, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the Appellants Writ Petition (C) No.10626/2017 assailing an order dated 23rd November, 2017 issued by the Respondent No.1, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) where he was working as Finance Officer, asking him to proceed on leave with immediate effect and the order dated 25th November, 2017 issued by JNU relieving ...
Sarvesh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-03-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 466/2019 SARVESH versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Karan Pandey and Mr. Lalit Naagar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Raj Kumar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.411/2018 under Sections 341/323/506/325/3Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S. Govindpuri.2. Subject FIR was registered alleging that the complainant was standing outside his fathers grocery shop when the neighbours inter- alia the petitioner came to the respondent and started fighting with them. When it was objected to the petitioner came out of his house with a sword and assaulted the complainant with the sword on his BAIL APPLN.466/2019 Page 1 of 3 head. Thereafter it is alleged that the parents of the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »