Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Biplav Biswas vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~21 to 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Judgement pronounced on:31. t May, 2019 + CRL.A. 681/2017 BIPLAV BISWAS .... Appellant Through: Mr. KTS Tulsi, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Faraz Khan, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State .... Respondent CRL.A. 705/2017 DEEPAK .... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 1161/2017 DEEPAK .... Appellant Through: Mr. SB Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State .... Respondent CRL.A. 6/2018 HARDEEP .... Appellant Through: Ms. Swati Rathi, Advocate along with Mr. Rohit Boora, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 681/2017 & other connected matters Page 1 of 58 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHI...
M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd. Vs.krishan Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t April, 2019 Date of decision:31. t May, 2019 CS (OS) 2170/2013 & I.A.13164/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula & Ms. Taran Narula, Advocates. WITH CS(OS) 2376/2013, IA No.11525/2018 & 13181/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. versus BHOOM SINGH & ORS. Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Dhir with Mr. Aadhar Nauityal, Adv. for D-13 Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula, Advs. for D-17 WITH CS(OS) 305/2014 & I.A.13163/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y....
Raktim Debnath Through His Legal Guardian/Next Friend Mr. Ranjit Debna ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :31. t May, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 6719/2019 RAKTIM DEBNATH THROUGH HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN/NEXT FRIEND MR. RANJIT DEBNATH Through Mr. Ajay Kohli, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R-1 with Ms. Annu Singh, G.P. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL282402019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6719/2019 & C.M.28239/2019 (stay) 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be suffering from a Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy which is a rare severe type of muscular dystrophy and a ...
Kaushal Kumar Narula & Anr vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3061/2019 KAUSHAL KUMAR NARULA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr.V.V.R.Rao, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Vijay Pal Singh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.12306/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A.12307/2019 There is a delay of 33 days in re-filing the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 33 days in re- filing the petition is condoned Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3061/2019 1. Quashing of FIR No.36/2008, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station CAW Cell, Nanak Pura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 22nd January, 2018 (Annexure C). Crl.M.C.3061/2019 Page 1 of 3 2. Upon notice, Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respo...
Dr Meera Sood vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~19 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :31. t May, 2019 LPA4112019 DR MEERA SOOD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sunil J.Mathew and Ms.Sabah Iqbal Siddiqui, Advocates versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi/R-1. Mr.Santosh Kumar and Mr.Bibin Kurian, Advocates for R-2 & R-3. Mr.Apoorv Kurup and Ms.Nidhi Mittal, Advocates for UGC/R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 22.05.2019 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court. On an application being C.M.24792/2019 seeking interim relief, the following order was passed: On oral request of the counsel for the petitioner, University Grants Commission is impleaded as respondent no.4. Let amended memo of parties be filed within three days. Issue notice. Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1 as well as on behalf of ...
Ashok Kumar @ Began vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
` * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:31. .05.2019 Judgment Reserved on:19. 03.2019 + CRL. A. 670/2004 NARENDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector .....Respondent + CRL. A. 877/2005 Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. ASHOK KUMAR @ BEGAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. + CRL. A. 439/2004 RITESH KUMAR Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Advocate. Versus ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. .....Respondent CRL.A6702004, CRL.A8772005 & CRL.A.439/2004 Page 1 of 23 ` CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the impugned judgment dated 05.04.2004 passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi (ASJ) in Sessi...
Bhuwan Sharma & Ors vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3047/2019 BHUWAN SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Ajayender Sangwan, Mr.Amit Saxena, Ms.Dimple and Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocates Versus THE STATE & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Mahendra Mr.Dhruv Grover, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.12257/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3047/2019 1. Quashing of FIR No.8/2017, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC, registered at police station Adarsh Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 17th September, 2018 (Annexure P2).2. Upon notice, Ms. Neelam Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant of the FIR in question and she has been Crl.M.C.3047/2019 Page 1 of 3 ...
C. B. Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 31, 2019 CRL. A. 723/2013 RAJVIR SINGH @ RAJBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjay Dewan, Mr. R. P. Luthra with Ms. Sourabhi Luthra, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 751/2013 C. B. SINGH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. ..... Appellant Versus Amit Rathor, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT1 The above two captioned appeals arise out of common judgment of 18th May, 2013 which pertains to R.C.CY12006 E0005 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned two appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. Appellants-Rajvir Singh and C.B.Singh have been held guilty of the offences under Section 120B IPC read with Secti...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ........ Petitioner $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 1585/2019 STATE & ANR. versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #1 ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC (Crime) for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crime) for State. % Mr. Rajan Bhagat, DCP (Crime)/CRO, Mr. Rajesh Deo, DCP (Crime)/Legal Cell, Insp. Vijay Kumar Kataria, SHO, PS Mangol Puri, SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Mangol Puri. Date of Decision:30. h May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present petition has been registered as a writ of Habeas Corpus in pursuance to a direction given by the Public Interest Litigation Committee (PIL Committee) of this Court.2. It is pertinent to mention that a letter dated 23rd April, 2019 was received by this Court from Mrs. Lalita, resident of Ward No.3, Dhanko, W.P.(Crl.) 1585/2019 Page 1 of 6 District Mandla Patan, Madhya Pradesh stating that her daughter Rajmani, who had been working as...
Ambika Vikas Udyog vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence Delhi Zonal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2019
W.P.(C) 3624/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 2 + AMBIKA VIKAS UDYOG ........ Petitioner DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE DELHI ZONAL UNIT & ANR. Through: Mr Shubhankar Jha, Advocate. versus Through: Mr Satish Aggarwala, ........ RESPONDENTS Senior Standing Counsel for DRI/R-1 with Mr Vineet Sharma, Advocates. Mr K.S. Negi, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER3005.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This petition by M/s Ambika Vikas Udyog through its Partner, seeks a direction to the Respondent No.1, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to issue a no objection certificate (NOC) to the MMTC Limited (MMTC) (Respondent No.2) for release of the bank guarantee (BG)/security furnished by the... Petitioner to the MMTC.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner is in the business of export of gold jewellery. The gold for making such jewellery is procured by the... Petitioner from MMTC, which is a Government of India undertaking and...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »