Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Asthana vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2019 Decided on:31. t May, 2019 Crl.M.A. No.6377/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 3247/2018 DEVENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Ld. ASG for CBI with Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Prakarsh Airan, Advs. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Soumava Karmakar, Adv. for UOI. Crl.M.A. No.7218/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 3248/2018 RAKESH ASTHANA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A. Sharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. versus Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr. Shashwat Singh, Advs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Ld. ASG for CBI with Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, Mr. Prakarsh Airan, Advs. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Soumava Karmakar, Adv. for UOI. Crl.M.A. No.7354/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 3292/2018 MANOJ PRASAD ........ Petitioner Represented by: M...
M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd vs.suresh Chander & Other ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t April, 2019 Date of decision:31. t May, 2019 CS (OS) 2170/2013 & I.A.13164/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula & Ms. Taran Narula, Advocates. WITH CS(OS) 2376/2013, IA No.11525/2018 & 13181/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. versus BHOOM SINGH & ORS. Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Dhir with Mr. Aadhar Nauityal, Adv. for D-13 Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula, Advs. for D-17 WITH CS(OS) 305/2014 & I.A.13163/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y....
Geeta Arora @ Sonu Punjaban vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1268/2019 GEETA ARORA @SONU PUNJABAN STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. R.M. Tufail, Ms. Astha, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Mr. Equebal Nasir and Ms. Naahid Naasir, Advs. For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Gulshan Kumar Dr. Anita Rani, Medical Officer, Tihar Jai, CJ-06 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of two months in case FIR No.104/2014 under Sections 363/366/328/366- A/342/370/370A/372/373/376/34/120-B of the IPC and Sections 4/6/POCSO Act and Sections 3/4/ITP Act, Police Station Najafgarh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge 2. BAIL APPLN. 1268/2019 Page 1 of 4 against the petitioner has been framed under Sections 363/366/328/366-A/342/370/370A/372/373/376/34/12...
M/S Hero Exports vs.m/s Tiffins Barytes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2019. + O.M.P. 369/2008 M/S HERO EXPORTS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikilesh R., Advocate. (M:9810460429) versus M/S TIFFINS BARYTES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. A. Venkata Subramanian and Mr. K. Moorthy, Advocates. (M:9810239044) Mr. E. Omprakash, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bijoy Kumar Pradhan, Advocate for Committee of Creditors. (M:9810110646) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 7004/2019 in O.M.P. 369/2008 1. The present application has been filed by the Resolution Professional (`RP) seeking release/transfer of funds of the Respondent company secured with ABN Amro /RBS Bank, pursuant to the orders dated 18th July, 2008 and 26th November, 2008 passed by this Court.2. The background of the present application is that a Section 9 petition came to be filed being OMP3692008. The same related to a sale/purchase transaction between the... P...
Vikas vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAHENDER STATE VIKAS Reserved on:14. h September, 2018 Decided on:31. t May, 2019 CRL.A. 675/2017 Represented by: Mr. ..... Appellant Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate versus Represented by: Mr. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Rakesh Malik, PS Seemapuri ..... Respondent CRL.A. 789/2017 Represented by: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, ..... Appellant STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus Advocate ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Rakesh Malik, PS Seemapuri CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Mahender and Vikas challenge the impugned judgment dated 14th December, 2016 convicting them for offences punishable under Section 3and Section 25 Arms Act. Mahender was also convicted for the offence punishable under section 397 IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 2nd January, 2017, they were directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years each and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each, in defaul...
Ritesh Kumar vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
` * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:31. .05.2019 Judgment Reserved on:19. 03.2019 + CRL. A. 670/2004 NARENDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector .....Respondent + CRL. A. 877/2005 Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. ASHOK KUMAR @ BEGAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. + CRL. A. 439/2004 RITESH KUMAR Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Advocate. Versus ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. .....Respondent CRL.A6702004, CRL.A8772005 & CRL.A.439/2004 Page 1 of 23 ` CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the impugned judgment dated 05.04.2004 passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi (ASJ) in Sessi...
Sukash @ Sukesh Chandrashekar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
52# $~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h May, 2019 Decided on:31. t May, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 579/2019 SUKASH @ SUKESH CHANDRASHEKAR ...... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Mayank Tripathi, Adv. versus STATE .... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with ACP Jasbir Singh, Insp. Ritesh Kumar PS Cr.Br. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By this petition the petitioner seeks bail in case FIR No.56/2017 under Sections 467/468/471/474/170/201/120B IPC and Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 registered at PS Crime Branch.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in custody now for more than two years and thus bail be granted to him. Referring to the decision of the Honble Supreme Court dated 11th December, 2018 it is contended that despite the fact that the learned Tri...
Jarnail Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3030/2019 JARNAIL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners STATE & ANR Through: Mr.Sahil Sharma, Advocate. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Ramesh. Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.12204/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.C.3030/2019 Quashing of FIR No.59/2018, under Sections 498A/406/5IPC, registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 25th May, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos. 2, who is present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has...
Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd vs.charan Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t April, 2019 Date of decision:31. t May, 2019 CS (OS) 2170/2013 & I.A.13164/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula & Ms. Taran Narula, Advocates. WITH CS(OS) 2376/2013, IA No.11525/2018 & 13181/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. versus BHOOM SINGH & ORS. Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Dhir with Mr. Aadhar Nauityal, Adv. for D-13 Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula, Advs. for D-17 WITH CS(OS) 305/2014 & I.A.13163/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y....
Yogender Garg vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 31, 2019 CRL. A. 74/2013 YOGENDER GARG ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rakesh Munjal, Sr.Advocate with Mr. R.P.S.Sirohi, Ms.Yashita Munjal, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 54/2013 C. B. SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Versus Mr. Amit Rathor, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT1 The above two captioned appeals arise out of common judgment of 19th December, 2012 which pertains to R.C. CY12006 E0005 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned two appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. Appellants C.B.Singh and Yogender Garg have been held guilty of the offences under Section 120B IPC read with S...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »