Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajvir Singh @ Rajbir Singh vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 31, 2019 CRL. A. 723/2013 RAJVIR SINGH @ RAJBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjay Dewan, Mr. R. P. Luthra with Ms. Sourabhi Luthra, Advocates. Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 751/2013 C. B. SINGH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. ..... Appellant Versus Amit Rathor, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT1 The above two captioned appeals arise out of common judgment of 18th May, 2013 which pertains to R.C.CY12006 E0005 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned two appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. Appellants-Rajvir Singh and C.B.Singh have been held guilty of the offences under Section 120B IPC read with Secti...
Hari Kishan vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.No.3865/2016 Judgment reserved on :19. 02.2018 Date of decision :31. 05.2019 HARI KISHAN Through: Mr. Raj Singh, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner STATE (NCT of Delhi) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with Inspector Pyare Lal. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner, Hari Kishan Singh S/o Jaipal Singh, has been chargesheeted in relation to FIR No.20/2014, Police Station Qutub Minar Metro, for the alleged possession of a live round (8MM KF-91) on 25.2.2014 at 12.35 hours at the Saket Metro Station (South Side X- BIS machine) when the same was detected by Ct. R.K.Rout (sitting on the machine) and Ct. Ghatage Sahas M. who was conducting the baggage checking and has thus been chargesheeted for the alleged commission of an offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.2. The petitioner, vide this petition seeks the quashing of the said FIR submitting to the ef...
Mohit Rajora @ Gotu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* % + STATE + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h May, 2019 Decided on:31. t May, 2019 CRL.A. 74/2017 MOHIT RAJORA @ GOTU ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. M.C. Sharma, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Saurabh, P.S. Govind Puri CRL.A. 362/2017 VINEET GUPTA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Mayank Mukherjee, DHCLSC Mikhail Advocate STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Saurabh, P.S. Govind Puri ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By these appeals, appellants Mohit Rajora @ Gotu and Vineet Gupta challenge the impugned judgment dated 8th December 2016 wherein they were convicted for offences punishable under Section 3IPC in FIR No.252/2014 registered at PS Govind Puri and the order on sentence dated 16th December 2016 whereby the appellants were directed to undergo CRL.A. 74/2017 & 362/2017 Page 1 of 8 rigorous imprisonment for a period...
M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd. Vs.dalel Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t April, 2019 Date of decision:31. t May, 2019 CS (OS) 2170/2013 & I.A.13164/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula & Ms. Taran Narula, Advocates. WITH CS(OS) 2376/2013, IA No.11525/2018 & 13181/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. versus BHOOM SINGH & ORS. Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Dhir with Mr. Aadhar Nauityal, Adv. for D-13 Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula, Advs. for D-17 WITH CS(OS) 305/2014 & I.A.13163/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y....
Rahul Kaushik vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :31. t May, 2019 $~13 * % + W.P.(C) 6601/2019 RAHUL KAUSHIK ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Kohli, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R-1 with Ms. Annu Singh, G.P. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for R-2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL2790304/2019 (Exemptions) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 6601/2019 & C.M.27902/2019 (stay) 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be suffering from Beckers Muscular Dystrophy which is a rare X-linked recessive inherited disorder characterized by slowly progressing muscle weakness of legs and...
Rajeshwar Dayal vs.preeti Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :16. 05.2019. Date of Decision :31. 05.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: + RC.REV. 72/2016 and CM APPL. 4199/2016 (Stay) RAJESHWAR DAYAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Mukul Kumar and Mr. P.D. Sharma, Advocates versus PREETI GUPTA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ravish K. Goyal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. The present proceedings instituted under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as DRC Act) assail the impugned order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the ACJ/CCJ/ARC, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in E-118/2013 whereby the application of the petitioner/tenant seeking leave to defend was dismissed and consequently an order of eviction of the petitioner/tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act was passed qua the tenanted premises i.e, shop on the ground floor of property bearing no.530, Chatta Hingamal, Chotta Bazar, Shahdara, Delhi-32. R.C.Rev.72/...
Lavkush & Ors. Vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3085/2019 & Crl.M.A. 12431/2019 LAVKUSH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.C.Chaudhary & Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Advocates with petitioners in person Versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with Inspector Sushil Kumar... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.152/2015, under Sections 323/354-A/5IPC, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 28th May, 2019 of respondents No.2 and 3 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2 and 3 present in the Court, are the complainant party of FIR in question and they have been identified...
Rakesh Kumar vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 31, 2019 CRL. A. 602/2013 C.B. SINGH Through: Versus ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. Amit Rathor, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 601/2013 R.K.GUPTA Through: Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate Versus ..... Appellant CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 600/2013 RAKESH KUMAR Through: Versus Mr.R.P.Luthra, Advocate and Ms.Sourabhi Luthra, Advocate ..... Appellant CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. Crl.A.No.602/2013, 601/2013, 600/2013 & 596/2013 Page 1 of 12 + CRL. A. 596/2013 ASHOK KUMAR ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anup Kumar and Mr.Subodh Versus Prasad Deo, Advocates CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Publ...
Kanupriya Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* I N T H E H I GH C O U R T O F D E L H I A T N E W D E L H I % Judgment reserved on:28. h February, 2019 Judgment delivered on:31. t May, 2019 + CRL. REV. PET. 849/2018 & Crl. M.A. 33234/2018 KANUPRIYA SHARMA versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Sharma, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Tushar Sannu, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 25.08.2018 whereby the Appellate Court allowed the appeal filed by Respondent No.2/husband, impugning order dated 26.06.2018 of the Trial Court and set aside the same. The Trial Court has awarded interim maintenance to the... Petitioner/wife of Rs. 16,500/- per month from the date of filing of the petition under Section 23(1) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the DV Act).2.... Petitio...
Anupama Bansal vs.suraj Bhan Bansal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(OS) 46/2019 & C.M. No.21578/2019 Reserved on:06. 05.2019 Date of decision:31. 05.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Nitesh Mehra, Ms. Hitaakshi Mehra, Mr. Amol Acharya and Mr. Rishabh Dheer, Advocates with appellants husband in person. IN THE MATTER OF: ANUPAMA BANSAL SURAJ BHAN BANSAL & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal and Ms. Isha Garg, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present appeal is directed against an order dated 12.3.2109, passed by the learned Single Judge allowing an application filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff No.1 and respondent No.2/plaintiff No.2 under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, registered as I.A. No.23589/2015. By the impugned order, the suit for declaration, cancellation, possession, rendition of accounts and permanent and mandatory injunctions filed by the respondents in respect of agricultural land, measu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »