Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Chaudhary @ Manish Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1039/2019 Judgment delivered on:23. 05.2019 MANISH CHAUDHARY @ MANISH KUMAR ...... Petitioner versus STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. M.R. Sisodia, Mr. Gaurav Sisodia, Mr. Akvar M. Khan and Mr. A.P.S. Sisodia, Advocates For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Inspector Ravindra Singh, P.S.: Hauz Qazi CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.131/2018, initially, registered under Section 3IPC, after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed under Section 364/365/302/201/120-B/34 IPC, Police Station Hauz Qazi.2. Allegations of the prosecution are that a missing report was lodged of one Sushil Kumar. In the FIR it is alleged that Sushil Kumar was having an affair with co-accused Dimple @ Dolly Chaudhary. Subsequently, Sushil Kumar came to know that she was having af...
Ansal Housing & Construction Limited vs.regional Provident Fund Commis ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :22.09.2017 Date of decision:23.05.2019 W.P.(C) 6435/2011 ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Tapas Tyagi & Ms. Akanksha Jain, Avocates. versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Keshav Mohan and Mr. Piyush Chaudhary, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner M/s Ansal Housing & Construction Limited seeks the setting aside of order dated 26.08.2011 of the learned Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal in ATA No.723(4)/2009 and order No.Damages Cell/C-2/DL/8493/12928 dated 30.09.2009 passed by the learned RPFC i.e. the respondent arrayed to the present petition under Section 14B & 7Q of the Employee's Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act'). W.P. (C) 6435/2011 Page 1 of 40 2. Vide the impugned order ...
Nitin Gupta & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 23, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2785/2019 NITIN GUPTA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.V.Hari Pillai and Mr.Manish Kumar Saryal, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sanjay Kumar. Mr. Akshay Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.11202/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2785/2019 Quashing of FIR No.22/2016, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 20th March, 2019 (Annexure P-2). Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Sanjay Kumar on the basis of identity pr...
Ujjwal Tripathi vs.director General, National Testing Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. with Mr. Aman Rewaria, Adv. for NTA Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. for IIT, Roorkee % 1. $~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5104/2019 & CM APPL. 22588/2019 UJJWAL TRIPATHI ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The grievance of the petitioner, as set out in the writ petition, was that, despite being a student belonging to the Economically Weaker Section (hereinafter referred to as EWS), he has been treated by the National Testing Agency (hereinafter referred to as the NTA), which conducts the Joint Entrance Examination (Main) [hereinafter referred to as the JEE (Main)]., as a General category candidate.2. The JEE (Main) Examination, it may be noted, is an examination which is required to be undertaken by candidates who W.P.(C) 5104/2019 Page 1 of 6 aspire to obtain entry i...
Abhinav Bansal & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 23, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2766/2019 ABHINAV BANSAL & ANR Through: Mr. K.C. Jain, Advocate. .....Petitioners Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pankaj Kumar. Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.132/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Sabzi Mandi, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 14th August, 2018 and affidavit of 20th May, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pankaj Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has be...
Neeru Dhir and Ors vs.kamal Kishore and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d May, 2019 CS(OS) 101/2016 & IAs No.2822/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), 5075/2016 (of D-1 u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC), 5076/2016 (of D-1 u/O VII R-11 CPC), 7213/2016 (of D-4 to 9A u/O I R-9&10 CPC), 7215/2016 (of D-4 to 9A u/O VII R-11 CPC), 7650/2016 (of D-2&3 u/O VII R-11 CPC) & 8882/2016 (of D-2&3 u/O I R- 9&10 CPC) NEERU DHIR AND ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rakesh Mukhija and Mr. Rajiv Singh Pilania, Advs. Versus KAMAL KISHORE AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Nilava Banerjee and Ms. Swati Singh, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Lakshay Dhamija and Mr. Sunav Rastogi, Advs. for D-2 to 9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The three plaintiffs, namely (a) Neeru Dhir; (b) Nipun Dhir; and, (c) Vatsala Dhir, being the widow, son and daughter of late Anil Kumar Dhir, have instituted this suit for partition of Property No.C- 324, Vivek Vihar, Delhi 110 095 and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienati...
Roop Singh @ Vicky vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 865/2019 Judgment delivered on:23. 05.2019 ROOP SINGH @ VICKY ........ Petitioner versus STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Amit Nahata, Mr. Sumit Kumar Mishra and Mr. Pushkar Mehta, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.378/2014 under Sections 392/397/342/5IPC and Sections 25/27/of the Arms Act, Police Station Lahori Gate.2. On 09.12.2014 a PCR call was received regarding robbery. When the police party reached the spot, complaint was lodged by owner of the shop that he is a trader in dry fruits and he along with his nephew were sitting in the office of the shop and his employees were working in the adjoining room.3. At about 6 in the evening, one boy entered the office and took out a BAIL APPLN. 865/2019 Page 1 of...
Deepanshu Kumar Gaur vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~2. * + % W.P.(C) 5044/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 05.2019 ........ Petitioner DEEPANSHU KUMAR GAUR Through: Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv. versus ..... Respondent UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI Through: Mr. K.V. Sreemithun, Senior panel counsel, UOI, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, GP. VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.22343/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5044/2019 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 27.03.2019 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.629/2018. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner was aggrieved by the fact that he was not permitted to join the post of Store Keeper Grade-II (SK-II) in MES W.P.(C.) No.5044/2019 Page 1 of 7 when he reported for joining the said post on 19.06.2017...
Hem Karan Bidhuri vs.delhi Pollution Control Committee (Dpcc)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 23, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 510/2018 HEM KARAN BIDHURI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate Versus DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE (DPCC) Through: Mr.Biraja Mahapatro, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT The Appellate Court vide impugned judgment of 24th May 2018, 1. upholds the petitioners conviction under Sections 24 read with Section 43, Section 25 read with Section 44, and Section 33A read with Section 41 of The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the minimum sentence of one year and six months and fine imposed by trial court.2. The facts giving rise to this petition as noted in the impugned judgment are as under:-"Case of complainant namely Delhi Pollution Control Committee (in short DPCC) in brief is that on 21.02.2000 at 258, Village Tehkhand, New Delhi-20 accused were running the unit engaged in Textile printing in the name and style of M/s ...
Din Bandhu Dass vs.delhi Technological University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~31 & 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5020/2019, C.M.24197/2019 versus DIN BANDHU DASS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY + W.P.(C) 3110/2019, C.M.Nos.14274/2019 & 20002/2019 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent MESSRS. RASOI CANTEEN & CATERERS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.A.K.Mata, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sudharshan Kumar ........ Petitioner versus Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner in item no.31. Mr.Raman Kapoor, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Joydeep Sarma, Advocate for the petitioner in item no.32. Mr.M.M.Singh applicant/intervenor in item no.31. Mr.Aldanish Rein, Advocate for Delhi Technological University in both the matters. and Mr.S.K.Pal, Advocates for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 5020/2019, C.M.24197/2019 (u/O1R10CPC) W.P.(C) 3110/2019, C.M.Nos.14274/2019 (stay) & 20002/2019 (stay) 1. With the consent of the parties, we set...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »