Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari vs.kamini Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 05.2019 CRL.REV.P. 27/2017 KAMLESH KUMAR TIWARI versus KAMINI TIWARI Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav Prakash Shukla, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saroja, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, Mr. Abhinandana Kain, Mr. K. Shukla, Mr. Piyush Dwivedi, Advs. With petitioner in person. For the Respondent : Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) REV. PET. 195/2018 & Crl. M.A. 8706/2018 1.... Petitioner had filed the subject revision petition impugning order dated 31.08.2016 whereby two appeals; one filed by the petitioner and the other filed by the respondent were disposed of. Both the appeals had impugned order dated 11.04.2016 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner under Section 25(2) of the Protection of Women from CRL.REV.P272017 Page 1 of 5 Domestic V...
Lok-Beta Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3198/2018 LOK-BETA PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: Ms Anjali J.Manish and Ms ........ Petitioner versus Nidhi Saini, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor and Ms Shruti Dutt, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2305.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the decision of respondent no.3 (Policy Relaxation Committee hereafter PRC) taken in its meeting held on 08.08.2017 in Case No.4. By the said decision, the PRC has rejected the petitioners request for reconsidering its earlier decision rendered on 19.07.2016. The petitioner is, essentially, aggrieved by the decision of the PRC to not extend the export obligation period in respect of Advance Authorization bearing No.0310696315 dated 28.05.2012. W.P.(C) 3198/2018 Page 1 of 14 2. The petitioner is a merchant e...
Hemant Nimesh vs.central Board of Secondary Education and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d May, 2019 + W.P. (C) 8/2018 % 1. HEMANT NIMESH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arav Kapoor, Adv. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANR ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Ankur Goel, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner seeks alteration in the name of his father, as reflected in the Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation Certificate, issued by the CBSE, in 2011, at the time when the petitioner cleared his X class, from Surinder Nimesh to Surender Kumar Nimesh.2. His request, to the said effect, to the CBSE, having not met with any favourable response, the petitioner is before this Court. Sub-clauses (i) and (ii) of the Examination Bye-laws of the 3. CBSE deal with change, and correction, in the name of the candidate, or his/her father/mother/guardian, as entered in the record of the CBSE, at any stage while studying in clas...
Sidharth Talwar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 951/2019 Judgment delivered on:23. 05.2019 SIDHARTH TALWAR versus STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr.Rajat Mathur and Mr. Abhinav Sekhri and Mr. Krishan Datta Multani, Advocates Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Ajay Kumar, P.S.: Rajouri Garden CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.725/2017 under Sections 420/406/120B IPC, Police Station Rajouri Garden.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner along with his other family members i.e. the brother and the parents were running a jewellery shop by the name of Talwar Jewellers. It is alleged that money was deposited with the brother of the petitioner, who had taken out a lucky draw scheme. It is alleged that neither the money had been repaid nor any jewell...
Pradeep Kumar vs.the Registrar Cooperative Society and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~38. * + % W.P.(C) 1350/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. 05.2019 PRADEEP KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Srivastava with Ms. Shubhangi Rathore, Advs. versus THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC with Ms. Rudrakshi Dev and Ms. Hafsa Khan, Advs. for R-1 with Mr. Virender Kumar, RCS. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Mr. Manish Jain and Mr. Rukban Tyagi, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. We have heard learned counsels for the parties. The Registrar of Co- operative Societies (RCS) is also present and he has also made his submissions and we proceed to dispose of the present petition. W.P.(C.) No.1350/2019 Page 1 of 7 2. The petitioner had preferred this petition with the grievance that even though respondent No.2 Society had forwarded the KYC particulars of all the available members, the Registrar of Co-operative Soc...
Rev Solmon David vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 23, 2019 + CRL.REV.P.963/2018 & CRL.M.A. Nos.35542/2018, 2255/2019 REV SOLMON DAVID ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Vineet Chadha, Mr. Sachin & Ms. Saumitiri Pradhan, Advocates Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Kunal Kishore Ms. Rebecca John, Senior Counsel with Mr. Sudershan Rajan & Mr. Arvinder Mohan, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT1 In proceedings under section 145 of Cr.P.C., the concerned SDM in the impugned order dated 18th October,2018 has directed that the possession of the subject premises i.e 19 Raj Niwas Marg, Civil Lines, Delhi be handed to second respondent while holding as under:-"It is an admitted fact that Mr. Sandep Massey was the secretary of Kids Castle and was in possession of the property in dispute and both the par...
Messrs. Rasoi Canteen & Caterers vs.delhi Technological University & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~31 & 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5020/2019, C.M.24197/2019 versus DIN BANDHU DASS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY + W.P.(C) 3110/2019, C.M.Nos.14274/2019 & 20002/2019 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent MESSRS. RASOI CANTEEN & CATERERS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.A.K.Mata, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sudharshan Kumar ........ Petitioner versus Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner in item no.31. Mr.Raman Kapoor, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Joydeep Sarma, Advocate for the petitioner in item no.32. Mr.M.M.Singh applicant/intervenor in item no.31. Mr.Aldanish Rein, Advocate for Delhi Technological University in both the matters. and Mr.S.K.Pal, Advocates for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 5020/2019, C.M.24197/2019 (u/O1R10CPC) W.P.(C) 3110/2019, C.M.Nos.14274/2019 (stay) & 20002/2019 (stay) 1. With the consent of the parties, we set...
The State (Nct of Delhi) vs.suresh Gautam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 05.2019 CRL.REV.P. 392/2019 & Crl.M.(Bail) 617/2019 THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) versus SURESH GAUTAM & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Taneja, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 30.03.2019, whereby, the appeal filed by the petitioner, impugning order dated 08.12.2017, has been dismissed.2.... Petitioner has been convicted of an offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay fine of Rs.2,50,000/- and in default to undergo farther imprisonment of six CRL.REV.P.392/2019 Page 1 of 3 ...
Ambar Singh vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~27 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.674/2002 Decided on:-"23rd May, 2019 AMBAR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. Manjeet Kaur (the victim) was about 20 year old woman, married to the appellant for about three years, she being at the house of her brother Ranjeet Singh (PW-2) in Jhuggi No.22, near Central Market, near park of block nos. 11-12 of Kalyan Puri on 28.08.2000 (the day of Raksha Bandhan festival) when sometime around 5.30 p.m. she suffered burn injuries. The indisputable evidence on record would show that she was taken to Jai Prakash Narain Hospital (hospital) by her said brother Ranjeet Singh (PW-2), she being accompanied by her sister Babli Kaur (PW-1), and her husband (the appellant), all travelling in a three wheeler scooter (TSR). She succumbed to the b...
Jagan Nath vs.state c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2019
$~10 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.251/2002 Decided on:-"23rd May, 2019 JAGAN NATH STATE C.B.I. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumer Sethi & Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP for CBI with Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh & Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was an employee of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) posted as munshi of a cattle pound in Malviya Nagar during the relevant period. Jeet Ram (PW-1) was a local resident and would maintain cattle including a cow which had been impounded by the municipal officials. The cow had been taken and kept at the cattle pound where the appellant was the person incharge, he being assisted by a chowkidar Dharam Singh (DW-1). On 26.07.1991, PW-1 lodged a complaint (Ex.PW-1/A) with Anti Corruption Branch of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that the appellant, when approached on 26.07.1991 for release of his cow, had deman...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »