Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naresh Mandav & Anr vs.naeem Ahmed & Ors (Reliance General Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h May, 2019 $~38, 39, 40 * % + MAC.APP. 698/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate ..... Appellant versus NARESH MANDAV & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Palvinder Singh, Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2 + MAC.APP. 729/2017 & CM. APP. 29408/2017 M/S MAHARAJA AUTOMOBILES (INDIA) PVT LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Pramod K. Sharma, Mr.Prashant Bajaj, Advocates versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate Mr.Palvinder Singh, Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocates for respondents No.2 and 3 + MAC.APP. 334/2018 NARESH MANDAV & ANR MAC APP.698/2017,729/2017and 334/2018 ..... Appellants Page 1 of 6 Through: Mr.Palvinder Singh, Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocates versus NAEEM AHMED & ORS (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUD...
Vikash Bhardwaj @ Kala vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h September, 2018 Decided on:24. h May, 2019 CRL.A. 1220/2016 VIKASH BHARDWAJ @ KALA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma, Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Mr. Deepak Kumar and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocates. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with SI Karamvir, PS Narela. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Vikash Bhardwaj @ Kala challenges the impugned judgment dated 25th October, 2016 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 326 IPC in FIR No.55/2007 registered at PS Narela and the order on sentence of the even date directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of nine years and to pay a fine of 30,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the offence under Section 326 IPC is not made out as injury was not likely to ...
Pec Retired Employees Welfare Association vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24.05.2019 W.P.(C) 506/2018 & CM No.2176/2018, 4573/2019 & 4574/2019 % + PEC RETIRED EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For theRespondent :Mr Chetan Lokur with Mr Nitish : Chaudhary. :Ms Suparna Srivastava and Ms Nehul : Sharma, Advocates for R- Mr Sunil Dalal and Mr KrishKalra, : Advocates for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner an association of retired employees of respondent no.2 company (hereafter PECL) has filed the present petition impugning a circular dated 05.10.2017 issued by PECL (hereafter the impugned circular), whereby the medical reimbursement to its retired employees provided under a scheme has been discontinued.2. PECL an enterprise of the Central Government introduced a scheme, PECs Medical Policy for Retired Employees (hereafter the...
Nitin Yadav & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 24, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2813/2019 & CRL.M.A. 11337/2019 NITIN YADAV & ORS .....Petitioners STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Fauzi Sayeed, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajbir Singh. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.447/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Chhawala (South West District), Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 15th May, 2018 and affidavit of 17th May, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resol...
Deepak Kumar vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t May, 2019 Date of pronouncement:24. h May, 2019 + W.P. (C) 1621/2013 & CM APPL. 3054/2013 SMT. SUNITA YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. Saini, Adv. with Mr. D.D.A. Ankit Singh, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. with Ms. Shweta Anand, Advs. + W.P. (C) 6836/2016 & CM APPL. 28186/2016 % DEEPAK KUMAR Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. R. K. Saini, Adv. with Mr. Ankit Singh, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. with Ms. Shweta Anand, Advs. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT W.P. (C) No.1621/2013 1. In 2008, the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the DDA) launched a Scheme for providing flats, which came to be known as the DDA Housing Scheme 2008 (hereinafter W.P. (C) 1621/2013 & W.P. (C) 6836/2016 Page 1 of 25 referred to as the 2008 Scheme). The eligibility conditions, for applying for allotment of...
M/S Maharaja Automobiles (India) Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.reliance General Ins ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h May, 2019 $~38, 39, 40 * % + MAC.APP. 698/2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate ..... Appellant versus NARESH MANDAV & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Palvinder Singh, Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2 + MAC.APP. 729/2017 & CM. APP. 29408/2017 M/S MAHARAJA AUTOMOBILES (INDIA) PVT LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Pramod K. Sharma, Mr.Prashant Bajaj, Advocates versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate Mr.Palvinder Singh, Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocates for respondents No.2 and 3 + MAC.APP. 334/2018 NARESH MANDAV & ANR MAC APP.698/2017,729/2017and 334/2018 ..... Appellants Page 1 of 6 Through: Mr.Palvinder Singh, Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocates versus NAEEM AHMED & ORS (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUD...
Shambhu Yadav vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 920/2018 Reserved on:29. 04.2019 Date of decision:24. 05.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: SHAMBHU YADAV STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Mohit Bangwal, Advocate versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP... RESPONDENTCORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant has assailed the judgment and order on sentence dated 16.05.2018 and 19.05.2018 respectively passed by the Court of the learned ASJ-01/Special Judge, POCSO Act, North, Rohini, Delhi in Sessions Case No.589arising from FIR No.80/2016, registered at Police Station: Alipur under Section 377 IPC and under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'the POCSO Act'). In the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted for the offence of aggravated penetrative sexual assault on the victim, who is a minor boy aged 4 years, which is punishable...
Munna Lal & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2804/2019 & Crl.M.A. 11287-88/2019 MUNNA LAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj & Ms. Rashi Pandey, Advocates. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State wit SI Rajvir Singh.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.315/2015, under Sections 323/341/3IPC, registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 22nd May, 2019 of respondents No.2 and 3 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2 and 3 present in the Court, are the complainant party of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by...
National Highways Authority of India vs.pnc-bel (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 41/2019 Date of Decision :24. h May, 2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr.Ramesh Mr.Siddharth Ms.Isha Bansal, Advs. ........ Petitioner Kumar, & Pandey PNC-BEL (JV) versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj K Singh, Mr.Nilava Mr.Rahul Bandyopadhyay, Pandey & Mr.Adhip Roy, Advs.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed challenging the Arbitral Award dated 20.09.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement dated 04.02.2005, executed between the parties for the Project for Widening and Strengthening of National Highway No.24 from Km 93.00 to Km 149.25 to four lane standards (Garhmukteshwar to Moradabad) & ROB at Km 181 of NH- 24 and Bridges on NH-87 in Uttar Pradesh (Package-II...
Akbar @ Ganja vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 61/2019 Reserved on :29. 03.2019. Date of Decision :24. 05.2019. IN THE MATTER OF: AKBAR @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr. Lokesh K. Sharma, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment of conviction dated 29.09.2018 and order on sentence dated 29.09.2018, arising out of Sessions Case No.11/2018 in FIR No.319/2017, P.S. Moti Nagar whereby the appellant had been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 3IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for six months.2. The case of the prosecution, as noted by the trial court, is: As per the prosecution story, on receipt of DD No.42A regarding stabbing near Ram Dh...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »