Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Seema Alias Prabha vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~ * + + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 955/2018 SEEMA alias PRABHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with versus Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultanpuri, Delhi. AND CRL.A. 757/2018 KISHORE KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Advocate with Mr. Narsingh Narain Rai and Mr. Indu Bhushan Vimal, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Raju Yadav, PS Sultanpuri, Delhi. Date of Decision:24. h May, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Crl.A.No.757/2018 & 955/2018 JUDGMENT Page 1 of 47 MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. While Crl.A.955/2018 has been filed by appellant-accused Seema @ Prabha, Crl.A. 757/2018 has been filed by appellant-accused Kishore Kumar challenging the judgment dated 22nd December, 2017 convicting them under Sect...
Madhucom Projects Ltd. Vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~9 * % + W.P.(C) 892/2019 & CM APPL.4055, 11615 & 6378/2019 MADHUCOM PROJECTS LTD. Date of Judgment:24. h May, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Sumit K. Shukla, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padma Priya, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Mr. Syed Abdul Haseen, Ms. Raka Chatterjee & Mr. Mohit Pandey, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Primarily two reliefs are being sought.2. The first relief arises out of the letter issued by the respondent dated 18.01.2019 and uploaded on the website on 21.01.2019 disqualifying the petitioner from participating in the tender process and in turn declaring the bid of the petitioner as non-responsive on the basis of policy circular dated 02.01...
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd vs.mgr Enterprises & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h May, 2019 CRL.L.P. 344/2019 SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ajay P Tulsi and Nahar, Advocates. Praveen Sangwan, AR Samsung. Khushboo for versus MGR ENTERPRISES & ORS Represented by: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.11285/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Crl.M.A. No.11284/2019 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 39 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 344/2019 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 11th February 2019, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 the petitioner/complainant has preferred the present leave petition.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case as p...
Smt. Sunita Yadav vs.d.d.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t May, 2019 Date of pronouncement:24. h May, 2019 + W.P. (C) 1621/2013 & CM APPL. 3054/2013 SMT. SUNITA YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. Saini, Adv. with Mr. D.D.A. Ankit Singh, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. with Ms. Shweta Anand, Advs. + W.P. (C) 6836/2016 & CM APPL. 28186/2016 % DEEPAK KUMAR Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. R. K. Saini, Adv. with Mr. Ankit Singh, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. with Ms. Shweta Anand, Advs. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT W.P. (C) No.1621/2013 1. In 2008, the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the DDA) launched a Scheme for providing flats, which came to be known as the DDA Housing Scheme 2008 (hereinafter W.P. (C) 1621/2013 & W.P. (C) 6836/2016 Page 1 of 25 referred to as the 2008 Scheme). The eligibility conditions, for applying for allotment of...
Lajpat Rai Goel vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1972/2015 LAJPAT RAI GOEL Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with ........ Petitioners GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Vishwaranjan Kumar, Advocate Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate Ms. LAC/L&B. Mr. Ajay Verma, Sr Standing counsel with Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2405.2019 1. The prayers in the petition read as under: a) issue a writ, order or declaration declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings i.e. Section 4 notification dated 21.3.2003, Section 6 declaration dated 19.3.2004 and the award no.12/2005- 06/DC(NW) dated 5.8.2005 in respect of the land comprised in Khasra nos. 3(5-2), 3(4-0), (4-16) and 3(1-0) situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Barwala, Delhi have lapsed in view of sub-section 2 of Section 24 of the Right to Fair ...
Jatin Dhawan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 24, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2805/2019 & Crl.M.A. 11292/2019 JATIN DHAWAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kanishka Kharbanda, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Rajbir Singh Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.336/2016, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 6th October, 2018 and affidavit of 7th May, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rajbir Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 2805/2019 Page 1...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs.sh. Raj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:24. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5462/2019 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. Through: Mr. Aman Bakshi and Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocates .....Petitioners Versus SH. RAJ KUMAR Through: None. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) This matter has been received on transfer.1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 6th February, 2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The respondent herein was working as a Horticulture Inspector in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (for short the MCD). An industrial dispute was raised by him claiming promotion to the post of Section Officer from the date his juniors were promoted. He also sought consequential benefits including arrears of salary. By an Award of 24th March, 2009, relief of notional promotion was granted in favour of the respondent alongwith the arrears of salary. The writ petitio...
Pradeep Kumar & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3032019 PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS Date of decision:24. 05.2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.P. Saxena, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava & Ms. Nehul CORAM: Sharma, Advocates for R-1 to 3 Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate for R-4 & 5/EIC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the order dated 21.01.2019 passed by the learned single judge in a writ petition filed by the appellants bearing No.W.P.(C) 623/2019 whereby the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground of delay and latches.2. From a somewhat sketchy writ petition and an equally sketchy appeal, we have been able to gather certain facts involved in the present case and which are that the three appellants in the present appeal worked in the Export Inspection Agency-Delhi (referred to as Agency hereinafter), under the Administ...
Global Ceramics Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Principal Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h May, 2019 Decided on:24. h May, 2019 Through: Mr. Krishan Kant, Advocate. ..... Appellant W.P. (C) 6706/2016 + GLOBAL CERAMICS PVT. LTD. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-1 Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Subani Mathur, Advocates for Revenue. AND + THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE.... Appellant Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Subani Mathur, Advocates for Revenue. W.P. (C) 9152/2016 versus M/S B.R. CERAMICS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Seema Jain, Mr Ajay K. Jain, Mr Dushyant K. Mahant and Ms Shova Choudhary, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA W.P. (C) Nos. 6706/2016 & 9152/2016 Page 1 of 11 % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two writ petitions raising a common question of law and accordingly are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. W.P. (C) No.6706/2016 is by Glob...
Dr. Rachna Khanna Singh vs.santosh s.p. Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA APPL.24781/2019 & CM APPL.25194/2019 APPL.4317/2019, No.17/2019, CM CM Judgment reserved on :29. 01.2019 Date of decision :24.05.2019 Dr. RACHNA KHANNA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Norula & Ms. Bhawna Khanna, Advocates versus SANTOSH S.P. SINGH AND ORS. Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Sethi, Sandeep Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchi Singh & Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present regular second appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 22.10.2018 of the First Appellate Court of the ADJ-02 (South-East) in RCA No.20423/2016 which upheld the judgment dated 16.11.2016 of the JSCC-ASCJ-GJ, South-East District, Saket, New Delhi in CS No.51412/2016 whereby the suit of the plaintiff therein arrayed as the respondent no.1 herein was decreed as under:-"The suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff Ms. Santosh SP Singh with the direction to the defen...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »