Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karamvir & Ors vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4422/2017 KARAMVIR & ORS Through: Date of Order: May 27, 2019... Petitioners in person. .....Petitioners Versus THE STATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Rajbir Singh.... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.390/2008 under Sections 325/323/452/ 354/4of IPC, registered at Police Station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of 23rd October, 2017 of respondents No.2 & 3 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2 & 3 present in the Court, are the complainant party of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir Singh, on the basis of identity proof produced by...
D. K. Chopra vs.registrar General Delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:27. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5899/2019 D. K. CHOPRA Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus REGISTRAR GENERAL DELHI HIGH COURT .....Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Bansal, Standing Counsel with Mr.Aman Rewaria, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed seeking a declaration that the Delhi High Court Rules be declared ultra vires the Delhi Official Languages Act, 2003 to the extent they allow only English as the language in which the pleadings can be filed in the High Court, as well as seeking a direction to amend the Delhi High Court Rules permitting the pleadings/petitions in Hindi by adding the words or Hindi in Devnagri Script after the word English wherever language of the Court is mentioned as English. A further direction is sought to the respondent to immediately allow the petition of the petitioner to be...
Mahesh & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 27, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2840/2019 & Crl.M.A. 11496/2019 MAHESH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Meenu Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Rajpal. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.585/2015, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 6th February, 2019 and affidavit of 21st May, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rajpal on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute bet...
Saraswati Education Society vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h May, 2019 SARASWATI EDUCATION SOCIETY + W.P.(C) 5853/2019 and CM Nos.25498/2019, 25499/2019 Through: Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Kohli, CGSC for R-1 Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Mr. Tarun Verma, Ms. Biakthansangi Das and Ms. Arunima Pal, Advs. for R-2/MCI % 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 27.05.2019 The petitioner, which claims to be a charitable trust, which was intending to set up a Medical College at Raigarh, Maharashtra, applied, for permission to do so, for the academic year 2019-2010, to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (hereinafter referred to as the Ministry). The said application was forwarded, by the Ministry, to the Medical Council of India (MCI), for the MCI to evaluate the proposal and make recommendations thereon, under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 for ...
The Principal Commissioner of Central Excise vs.m/s b.r. Ceramics (P) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h May, 2019 Decided on:24. h May, 2019 Through: Mr. Krishan Kant, Advocate. ..... Appellant W.P. (C) 6706/2016 + GLOBAL CERAMICS PVT. LTD. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-1 Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Subani Mathur, Advocates for Revenue. AND + THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE.... Appellant Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Subani Mathur, Advocates for Revenue. W.P. (C) 9152/2016 versus M/S B.R. CERAMICS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Seema Jain, Mr Ajay K. Jain, Mr Dushyant K. Mahant and Ms Shova Choudhary, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA W.P. (C) Nos. 6706/2016 & 9152/2016 Page 1 of 11 % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two writ petitions raising a common question of law and accordingly are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. W.P. (C) No.6706/2016 is by Glob...
Rajender vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1250/2019 Judgment delivered on:24. 05.2019 RAJENDER versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Dalal, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.417/2018 under Section 307/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Nihal Vihar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix was harassed by her in-laws as also the petitioner who is her husband and they off and on used to demand money from her. It is alleged that on the day of the incident there was once again a fight and later a scuffle and on account of which it is alleged that the complainant went to the roof where her husband, father-in- law, mother-in-law followed her and despite her protest the three of them threw her from the roof....
Parveen Chauhan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~6 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Appeal No.751/2002 Decided on:-"24th May, 2019 PARVEEN CHAUHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant K. Sud, Senior Advocate with Mr. Honey Khanna, & Mr. Shailesh Poddar, Advocates with appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Prem Ram Arya, PS Hari Hagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the basis of reports (charge sheets) under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) upon conclusion of investigation into two different cases FIR No.958/1996 and FIR No.967/1996, both of Police Station Hari Nagar the appellant along with one Kishan @ Pammi were brought to trial in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, the two cases (sessions case (nos.199/1997 and 09/2000) having been clubbed for such purposes. The trial was held primarily on the charge under section 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against the appellant and co-ac...
Suraj @ Ladi vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"24th May, 2019 + CRL.A. 655/2002 SURAJ @ LADI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant along with two others was brought to trial in sessions case (no.213/1997) in the court of the additional sessions judge, New Delhi, on the basis of evidence gathered during investigation of first information report (FIR) no.158/1996 of police station Chitranjan Park and by judgment dated 11.04.2002 held guilty and convicted on the charge for offences under Sections 397 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The additional sessions judge, by subsequent order dated 22.04.2002, awarded rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs.5,000/- on the first count and rigorous imprisonment for one year Crl. A6552002 Page 1 of 9 with fine of Rs.1,000/- on the second count as the...
Jamia Millia Islamia vs.dr. Faqeer Mohammad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~38 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:24. h May, 2019 LPA3692019 & CM APPL. 25149/2019, 25151/2019 JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Zeba Khair and Mr.Afzal S. Shah, versus Advocates DR. FAQEER MOHAMMAD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Chandra Shekhar and Mr.Prashant Shekhar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.563/2019 1. Since Mr.Chandra Shekhar, learned counsel for the caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 25150/2019 (Exemption) 2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.3. The application stands disposed of. LPA3692019 & CM APPLs. 25149/2019 (additional documents), 25151/2019 (stay) 4. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment passed by a learned Single Judge dated 23.04.2019 arising out of a writ petition filed by the LPA3692019 Page 1 of 9 respondent wherein the direction was sought to apply General Provident Fund-cum-...
M/S Apana Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs.container Corporation of India Ltd. A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2019
$~43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5840/2019 & CM APPLN. No.25477/2019 M/S APANA LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenu Pandey and Mr. Gaurav Kohli, Advs. versus CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajinder Dhawan and Mr. B. S. Rana, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2405.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning 1. a communication dated 08.04.2019 issued by the respondents (hereafter referred to as CONCOR), terminating the contract for handling of containers awarded to the petitioner. It is the petitioners case that the termination is illegal and arbitrary. On 25.11.2016, CONCOR had issued a notice inviting e-tender 2. for Handling Containers at CFS, Dronagiri by reverse auction. The petitioner had participated in the said tender process and was declared successful. On 03.03.2017, a Letter of Intent was iss...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »