Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishna Tokas vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 6608/2019 KRISHNA TOKAS Date of Order :31. t May, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Kohli, Advocate. versus CORAM: UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R-1 with Ms. Annu Singh, G.P. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL2793132/2019 (Exemptions) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 6608/2019 & C.M.27930/2019 (stay) 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be suffering from spinal cord injury which is a damage to the spinal cord that causes temporary or permanent changes in its function. Spinal Cord injury gener...
Dinesh Chandra Mishra vs.india Council of Agriculture
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~19. * + % W.P.(C) 6538/2019 DINESH CHANDRA MISHRA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. 05.2019 ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person. versus INDIA COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gagan Mathur & Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 27699/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6538/2019 & CM APPL. 27698/2019 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 04.02.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.405/2019. The Tribunal has rejected the Original Application W.P.(C.) No.6538/2019 Page 1 of 3 preferred by the petitioner wherein he had assailed the recommendations made by the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to take action against the petitioner in relation to his alleged miscondu...
Sanjay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~R-1A * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 523/2003 % Judgment reserved on:28th May, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2019 SANJAY STATE Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Agarwal, Mr. Subrata Das and Mr.Anup Ratan Dutta Choudhary, Advocates .....Appellant Versus Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with ASI ..... Respondent Prem Ram Arya, PS Hari Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.The present Appeal is instituted on behalf of the appellant under 1. Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 26.03.2003 and order on sentence dated 28.03.2003 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Session Case No.133/2001 in FIR No.160/2001, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) whereby the appellant was convicted for t...
r.k.gupta vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 31, 2019 CRL. A. 602/2013 C.B. SINGH Through: Versus ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey and Mr. Amit Rathor, Advocates. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 601/2013 R.K.GUPTA Through: Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Advocate Versus ..... Appellant CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. + CRL. A. 600/2013 RAKESH KUMAR Through: Versus Mr.R.P.Luthra, Advocate and Ms.Sourabhi Luthra, Advocate ..... Appellant CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. Crl.A.No.602/2013, 601/2013, 600/2013 & 596/2013 Page 1 of 12 + CRL. A. 596/2013 ASHOK KUMAR ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anup Kumar and Mr.Subodh Versus Prasad Deo, Advocates CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Publ...
Shahanawaz @ Sanu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 04, 2018 Judgment Delivered on: May 31, 2019 CRL.A. 247/2017 SHAHANAWAZ @ SANU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Saurabh Tyagi, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Prem Kumar, PS Kotwali CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, Shahnawaz @ Sanu challenges the impugned judgment dated 11th January, 2017 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act in FIR No.106/2013 registered at PS Kotwali and the order on sentence of the even date directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of 10,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of 1...
Amit Kumar vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on :29. h May, 2019 Judgment Delivered on:31. t May, 2019 CRL.A. 519/2016 AMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Hemant Gulati and Mr.Ghanshyam Kaushik, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, the appellant challenges the impugned judgment dated 17th February 2016 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 308 IPC in FIR No.88/2013 registered at PS Burari and the order on sentence dated 25th February 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of 5000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellant has been falsely implicated due to enmity. Appellant himself appeared in the witness box and also led defence evidence wh...
M/S Kushal Infraproject Industries India Ltd vs.parvesh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t April, 2019 Date of decision:31. t May, 2019 CS (OS) 2170/2013 & I.A.13164/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. ..... Plaintiff Aditya Singh, Advocates. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula & Ms. Taran Narula, Advocates. WITH CS(OS) 2376/2013, IA No.11525/2018 & 13181/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. versus BHOOM SINGH & ORS. Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Dhir with Mr. Aadhar Nauityal, Adv. for D-13 Mr. Y.P.Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhey Narula, Advs. for D-17 WITH CS(OS) 305/2014 & I.A.13163/2018 M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Dhruv and Mr. PARVESH KUMAR & ORS versus Aditya Singh, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y....
Rita Devi vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Date of Order :31. t May, 2019 versus RITA DEVI % + W.P.(C) 6599/2019 Through Mr. Ajay Kohli, Advocate. CORAM: UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through Mr. Yashish Chandra, Mr. Piyush Gaur & Mr. Yashaswi SK Chocksey, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL2789596/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 6599/2019 & C.M.27894/2019 (stay) 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.4. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be suffering from Dilated Cardiomyopathy which is condition wherein the heart becomes enlarged and cannot pump blood effectively. It is th...
Narender Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
` * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:31. .05.2019 Judgment Reserved on:19. 03.2019 + CRL. A. 670/2004 NARENDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector .....Respondent + CRL. A. 877/2005 Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. ASHOK KUMAR @ BEGAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. + CRL. A. 439/2004 RITESH KUMAR Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Advocate. Versus ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with Inspector Mukesh Kumar, PS-Hari Nagar. .....Respondent CRL.A6702004, CRL.A8772005 & CRL.A.439/2004 Page 1 of 23 ` CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the impugned judgment dated 05.04.2004 passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi (ASJ) in Sessi...
Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3073/2019 & Crl.M.A. 12369/2019 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arvind Gaur, Mr. Sabyasachi Mishra and Mr. Amit Garg, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Suresh Kumar. Ms. Mukta Gaur, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.34/2002, under Sections 498A/4IPC, registered at Police Station New Ushmanpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 30th March, 2019 of respondent No 2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent Nos. 2, who is present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Suresh Kumar, on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2 submits that the dispute be...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »