Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anuj Gosain vs.narcotic Control Bureau Through State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~15 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h May, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 202/2019 ANUJ GOSAIN versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Sagar, Advocate NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU THROUGH STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Yatharth Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) This order shall dispose of the application filed by the petitioner 1. under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, read with Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as the NDPS Act) for the grant of regular bail.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the prosecution case are that, on 2.12.2015, on the basis of secret information, two parcels booked under Airways Bill No.4555208195 and 4555208206 were intercepted at the office of DHL Courier Company, Rama Road, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi and the same were found to contain 390 gms and 325 gms respectively ...
Suresh Kumar vs. Shardha Ahuja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h May, 2019. CM(M) 837/2019 & CM APPL. 25404/2019 (stay) SURESH KUMAR Through: Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent SHARDHA AHUJA Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. The challenge in this petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution, is to an order dated 13.05.2019 by which the application of the petitioner herein to advance oral arguments has been rejected.2. The petitioner herein is the respondent in the eviction proceedings before the Trial Court. By an order dated 10.04.2019, keeping in mind the convenience of counsel on both sides, the Trial Court fixed the case for respondents evidence on 15.04.2019 at 11:30 am. The Court recorded that the present matter was one of the oldest matters pending in the Court and that it was inclined to dispose of it, as early as possible. The order recorded that a last opportunity was given and the evi...
Ram Niwas vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:27. h May, 2019 + LPA3522019 RAM NIWAS Through: Mr. Ashok Sekhri, Advocate ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Khanna and Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advocates for UOI Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Standing Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.24204/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. LPA3522019 3. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 1st April, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court by which the writ petition No.3227/2019 filed by the petitioner-appellant herein stands dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay and laches.4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the writ petition was filed well within the period of limitation and there is no delay in ...
Future Express vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 05.2019 + W.P.(C) 11360/2017 FUTURE EXPRESS Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Giriraj Subramanium and Mr Simarpal Singh Sawhney. : Mr Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Suhani Mathur for UOI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 15.09.2017 (hereafter the impugned order), whereby respondent no.3 (Chief Commissioner of Customs) has rejected the petitioners appeal against an order dated 27.01.2017 passed by respondent no.2 (Commissioner of Customs (General)). By the said order, respondent no.2 had revoked the Authorized Courier License (License No.DEL/POL/COUR/12/2014) granted to the petitioner. In addition, respondent no.2 had also directed forfeiture of the security amount of 10,00,000/- a...
Ajay Kumar & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 27, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 633/2019 & CRL.M.A. 2639/2019 AJAY KUMAR & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Deepak Vuttsya, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Subhash Chandra. Mr. Piyush Gautam & Mr. Lakshita Yadav, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.884/2014, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC & Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Samaipur Badli, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 25th January, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Subhash Chandra on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 633/2019 Page 1 of 3 Re...
In the Matter of M/S Anglo American Exploration (I) Private Limited (I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~CP-35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CO.PET. 13/2019 Date of Decision:27. 05.2019 IN THE MATTER OF M/S ANGLO AMERICAN EXPLORATION (I) PRIVATE LIMITED (IN MEMBERSVOL. LIQN.). ....... Petitioner Through Mrs. Isha Khanna, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956(herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) seeking for voluntary winding of M/s Anglo American Exploration (I) Private Limited. (in Members Voluntary Liquidation) (herein referred to as the said company).2. The said company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act with the name ANGLO AMERICAN EXPLORATION (INDIA) PRIAVTE LIMITED with Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana on 27.04.2001 with an authorized share capital of Rs.14,00,00,000 (Rupees Fourteen Crores only) divided into 1,40,00,000 (One Crore Forty Lac only) shares of Rs.10 (Rupees ...
Priyanka Sinha & Anr vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5776/2019 PRIYANKA SINHA & ANR ........ Petitioners Sameer Kumar Through: Mr. Ms.Nidhi Sahay, Advs. versus and GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Kaushik and Mr.Varun Tandon, Advs. for-1 Mr. Mohindere J.S. Rupal, Adv. for R- University of Delhi with Mr. Harsh Kaushik and Mr.Varun Tandon, Advs. Ms. Warisha Farasat, Panel Counsel- GNCTD with Ms. Rudrakshi Deo and Ms. Hafsa Khan, Advs.for R-3 Mr. T. Singhdev, Adv. with Ms. Puja Sarka, Ms. Michelle, Mr. Arunima Pal and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advs. for MCI Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Santwana, Advs. for R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 27.05.2019 The petitioners are MBBS students, who aspire to obtain Post Graduate degree/diploma, for which they appeared in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) 2019 (hereinafter referred to as NEET-PG2019). W.P.(C) 5776/2019 Pa...
Satender Singh & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2881/2019 Date of Order: May 27, 2019 .....Petitioners SATENDER SINGH & ORS Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor with ASI Suresh Kumar and SI C.B. Sharma. Ms. Pooja Pandey and Mr. Alok Motan and Mr. S.C. Motan, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.11598/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2881/2019 Quashing of FIR No.205/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC and under Section 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 of IPC, registered at Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 20th May, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and they have been CRL.M.C. 2881/2019 Page...
Ritu Garg & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h May, 2019 RITU GARG & ANR. CS(OS) 602/2018 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. L.K. Singh and Raj Kumar, Advs. Versus Through: Mr. Apoorv Khatar, Adv. for D-6. STATE & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Petition under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and ..... Defendants Guardianship Act, 1956, for granting permission to transfer by sale the undivided share of petitioner no.2 (minor) in the immovable built up property bearing no.85, Anand Lok, New Delhi measuring 393 sq. yds. is filed as a suit, pleading (i) that the plaintiff no.1 Ritu Garg is the mother and natural guardian of the plaintiff no.2 Tara Garg aged about eleven years; (ii) that the husband of the plaintiff no.1 and father of the plaintiff no.2 died on 16th January, 2013; (iii) the defendants no.2&3 Nikhil Garg and Neha Garg are the son and daughter respectively of the plaintiff no.1 and brother and sister respectively of the plaintiff no.2...
Mannu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 701/2017 % Judgment reserved on:20. h May, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:27. h May, 2019 MANNU STATE Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. ....Appellant Versus Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 The present Appeal is instituted on behalf of the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment of conviction dated 25.03.2017 and order on sentence dated 03.04.2017 passed by the Court of Special Judge (NDPS-01), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in Session Case No.56203/2016 in FIR No.455/2012, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentence...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »