Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Master Uday Das Thoruth His Legal Guardian/ Next Friend Mr. Uttam Das ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~23 & 24 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :28. h May, 2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS SHIKHA THROUGH HER LEGAL GUARDIAN / NEXT FRIEND MR. RAGHUBIR SINGH versus ........ Petitioner MASTER UDAY DAS THORUTH HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN/ NEXT FRIEND MR. UTTAM DAS ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 6057/2019, CM Appl. 26118/2019 (stay) + W.P.(C) 6069/2019, CM Appl. 26192/2019 (stay) Present : Mr. Ajay Kohli & Ms. Pooja Vohra, Advocates for petitioners CORAM: in both items. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate in both items. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for R-2 with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate in both items. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL26119/2019 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 6057/2019 CM APPL26193/2019 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 6069/2019 1. Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C)...
Mohit Kathuria & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2906/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate with petitioners in person. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr.M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rajbir Singh. Complainant in person. Versus MOHIT KATHURIA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR STATE & ANR. ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.A.11727/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2906/2019 Quashing of FIR No.212/2013, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Nangloi, Delhi, is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 7th April, 2019 (Annexure P-3) and affidavit of 20th May, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent CRL.M.C. 2906/2019 Page 1 of 3 No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be s...
Sunita Kumari & Ors vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
+ W.P.(C) 7203/2018 SUNITA KUMARI & ORS Date of decision:28. 05.2019 ........ Petitioners $~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.K. Prabhakara Rao, Adv. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC with Ms.Manisha Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Anil Kumar Yadav, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent no.1 to reinstate the petitioner in the posts of Anganwari Workers.2. The petitioners are women, initially joined as Anganwari Workers in Integrated Child Development Scheme (hereinafter referred to as ICDS) with respondent no.1 department. After they put about 10 years of service as Anganwari Workers with respondent no.1, respondent no.2 invited applications for the post of Anganwari supervisor on 20-21.07.2016 to be WP (C) 7203/2018 Page 1 of 10 deputed to respondent no.1 department. The petition...
Kms Medisurgi Ltd. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3043/2019 & CM Appl. 14042/2019 KMS MEDISURGI LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Rajan Bajaj and Mr.Abhimanyu Redhu, Advocates UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashim Sood, CGSC with Ms.Payal Chandra, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Ratan K.Singh and Ms.Priyanka Solanki, Advocates for R-2. Mr.P.Niroop and Mr.Chandan Kumar, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing directions to the respondents restraining the respondent no.2 from technically disqualifying the petitioner with respect to the tender no.HITES/PCD/PMSSY-III/30/URLG/18-19.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Ac...
Accor & Anr. Vs.mr. Ajay Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :27. h May, 2019 + CS(COMM) 191/2019 ACCOR & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. C.A. Brijesh and Ms. Shreyosi Pal, Advocates. versus MR. AJAY GUPTA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Ms. Payal Mittal, Advocate (M. No.9711969480) Defendant No.1 in person CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(ORAL) CS(COMM) 191/2019 1. The Plaintiff No.1 Accor, France, has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered trademarks and service marks against the Defendants. The Plaintiff No.2 AAPC Indian Hotel Management Private Limited is the Indian subsidiary of the Plaintiff No.1 French entity. The Plaintiffs claims to be a global hotel chain using the mark/name ACCOR and ACCOR HOTELS. The details of the trademark registrations of the Plaintiffs are set out in paragraph 14 of the plaint. The Plaint also gives details of the global reputation, sales turnover an...
Pawan Kamra vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~25 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h May, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1197/2019 PAWAN KAMRA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia and Mr. Akshay Kumar Verma, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP with Insp. Arun Chauhan, ACB, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) 1. This order shall govern the disposal of the application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.11/2011 dated 2.12.2011, under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) read with Sections 120-B/420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered at Police Station: ACB Civil Lines, Delhi.2. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant had filed a complaint dated 23.5.2007 addressed to the Central Vigilance Commissioner alleging that property bearing No.31, G.T. K...
Giesecke & Devrient Ms India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.oriental Bank of Commerce
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 462/2018 & I.A. 17429/2018, I.A. 3606/2019, I.A. 5098/2019 Reserved On 22.05.2019 Pronounced On 27.05.2019 1. GIESECKE & DEVRIENT MS INDIA PVT. LTD........ Petitioner Mr.Pancham Surana, Adv. Through: versus Through: ..... Respondent Mr.S.L. Gupta, Adv. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.I.A. no.5098/2019, I.A. No.17429/2018, I.A. No.3606/2019 and O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 462/2018 Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.5098/2019 has been filed by the respondent i.e. Oriental Bank of Commerce (hereafter referred to as OBC), for vacating interim order dated 18.12.2018 passed in I.A. No.17429/2018 filed in OMP(I)(COMM.) No.462/2018.2. In order to adjudicate upon the instant matter the following facts are required to be noticed:3. On 11.4.2018, OBC had floated a Request for Proposal (hereafter referred to as 1st RFP) for Empanelment of a Service Provider to Supply, Print and Personaliza...
Asad Mueed vs.jamia Hamdard (Deemed Universtiy) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:27. h May, 2019 + LPA3742019 ASAD MUEED Through: Mr.P.S.Patwalia, Senior Advocate ..... Appellant with Mr. Simran Mehta and Mr. Kshitij Mudgal, Advocates versus JAMIA HAMDARD (DEEMED UNIVERSTIY) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sarwar Raza and Mr.S.Ahmad, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shreyans Singhvi and Ms. Ekta Mehta, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 22nd May, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge, which has led to the filing of the present appeal. Three reliefs were sought in an application seeking interim relief, which was filed alongwith the writ petition, which are as under: - a. Pass an ad-interim ex-parte order thereby staying the operation of the impugned notification dated 17.05.2019 issued by the Registrar of Responden...
In the Matter of Qutab Buildtech Private Limited (In Members‟vol. Li ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
$~CP- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 05.2019 + CO.PET. 14/2019 IN THE MATTER OF QUTAB BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED (IN MEMBERSVOL. LIQN.). ....... Petitioner Through Mr Kunal Sharma, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956(herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) seeking for voluntary winding of QUTAB BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED (in Members Voluntary Liquidation) (herein referred to as the said company) 2. The said company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act with the name QUTAB BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED with Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana on 26.04.2005 having Corporate Identity Number U45201DL2005PTC135435.3. The authorized share capital of the said company was Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand Only) divided into 12,500 (Twelve Thousand Five Hundred...
Sh. Karan Singh Sandhu & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct, Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 27, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2863/2019 & Crl.M.A. 11549/2019 SH. KARAN SINGH SANDHU & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Versus GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Tinku Mr. Subhash Chandra, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.38/2016, under Sections 406/498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 20th May, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Tinku on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute C...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »