Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Chunnu Fashions vs.edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~37 * + Date of Decision:28. 05.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6090/2019 M/s CHUNNU FASHIONS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuj Dhingra and Ms. Nikita Khanna, Advocates. versus EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.P.Agrawal and Ms. Sonali Rastogi, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.26237/2019 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.6090/2019 & CM No.26236/2019 1. The petitioner has preferred this present petition to assail the order dated 15.02.2019 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi. The petitioner also seeks a direction that his application i.e. I.A. W.P.(C.) No.6090/2019 Page 1 of 5 No.1576/2017 filed in OA No.01/2013 before the DRT-II, be allowed and respondent No.1 be directed to place the relevant documents on record for the just and pr...
Birendra Shukla vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~20 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2605/2019 & CRL.M.A.11307/2019, Crl.M.A.10436/2019 BIRENDRA SHUKLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Chandiok and Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocates. STATE & ANR Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Suneet Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER2805.2019 Impugned order of 26th April, 2019 rejects petitioners application for waiver of the condition of deposit of 20% of the total fine amount imposed vide order 31st January, 2019. The Appellate Court in the impugned order has taken note of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and has referred to the decision of High Court of Bombay in Ajay Vinodchandra Shah vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 436 and the decision of High court Punjab & Haryana in Nitin Shashwat and Another vs. M/s Ajanta Timbers and Another (Crl M. 22839/2018 decid...
Beejakshree Varman vs.m/s Worlds Window Impex India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4571/2017 CRL.M.C. 4587/2017 CRL.M.C. 4588/2017 CRL.M.C. 4589/2017 CRL.M.C. 4590/2017 CRL.M.C. 2817/2018 BEEJAKSHREE VARMAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Akshay Singh and Ms.Tosha Versus Singh, Advocates M/S WORLDS WINDOW IMPEX INDIA PVT LTD..... Through: Mr.A.K. Babbar & Mr. Surinder Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Kumar, Advocates In the above captioned six petitions, quashing of six complaints ORDER under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the summoning orders is sought on the ground that the allegations levelled against petitioner are vague and that petitioner had resigned as Director of the accused-company on 19th July, 2014. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order while treating Crl.M.C. 4571/2017 as lead case.... Petitioners counsel subm...
M/S Teleecare Network India Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Asus Technology Pvt Ltd & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 731/2017, CCP(O) 42/2015, 12833/2015, 5022/2016, 2248/2018, 5770/2018 AND134772018 I.A.Nos.7941/2015, M/S TELEECARE NETWORK INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Mudit Sharma with Mr.Parvez Alam Khan, Advocates. versus M/S ASUS TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Daksh Kumar, Mr.SumitR.Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Reserved on :02. d May, 2019 Date of Decision:28. h May, 2019 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN,J I.As. 969//2015 & 5129/2018 1. The present suit has been filed for infringement, permanent and mandatory injunction, passing off, delivery up and damages. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"In the light of aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble court may be pleased to: i. Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, principal of...
Shri k.c.ghumaria vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: - 28.05.2019 + W.P.(C) 5316/2019 & C.M.No.23474/2019 SHRI K.C.GHUMARIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.P.S.Patwalia, with Mr.Avinash Lakhanpal & Mr.Dhiraj Kumar, Advs. Sr.Adv versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Adv for R-1 & 3. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 01.05.2019 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi dismissing O.A.No.1166/2019. The original application (O.A.) was preferred by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to expeditiously consider his candidature for the post of Member, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) as per the Office Memorandum dated 04.12.2018 and/or Office Memorandum dated 04.07.2018 inviting applications for the said post by following ...
Mukandi Lal vs.uoi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~34 * + Date of Decision:28. 05.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6086/2019 ........ Petitioner MUKANDI LAL Through: Dr. S.S.Hooda and Mr. Aditya Hooda, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhra Parashar and Mr. V.P.S.Charak, Advocates. Mr. Shivanshu Tiwari, DG. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.26227/2019 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.6086/2019 1. The petitioner has preferred this present writ petitioner to assail the order dated 26.4.2019 passed by the Directorate General of Border Security Force, whereby the respondents have rejected the petition preferred by the petitioner against his trial by Summary Security Force Court. The petitioner pleaded guilty to all the three charges framed against him. The Summary W.P.(C.) No.6086/2019 Page 1 of 4 Security Force Court returned its finding of guilt agains...
Ashok Choudhary vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2883/2019 ASHOK CHOUDHARY Date of Order: May 28, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vinod Yadav, Advocate. Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Bansi Lal. Mr.Sunil Fernades, Advocate and Ms.Zeeshan Diwan, Advocates for R-2. ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.11643/2019 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2883/2019 & Crl.M.A.11644/2019 1. Quashing of FIR No.451/2018, under Sections 135 of Indian Electricity Act (Amended), 2003, registered at Police Station Kotla Mubark Pur, South District, New Delhi, is sought on the basis of No Dues Certificate dated 30th November, 2018 (Annexure-E).2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that in view of No Dues Certificate (Annexure E), he has no objection if the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to ...
Raj Rewal vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h May, 2019 CS(COMM) 3/2018, IA No.90/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.92/2018 (u/s 80(2) CPC) RAJ REWAL ..... PLAINTIFF Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vedanta Varma, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Rupin Bahl & Mr. Akhil Kumar Gola, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... DEFENDANTS Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Yuvraj, Ms. Sneh Suman & Mr. Neil Mason, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The question for consideration is, whether an Architect, as author of 1. artistic work of architecture in the form of a building or structure having an artistic character or design and having a copyright therein, upon the owner of the land on which building is constructed choosing to demolish the said building to construct another building in its place, has a right to restrain the owner from doing so and if the building has been demolished, to demand compensation therefo...
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr. Vs.m/s Arora Stationers & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved:2. d November, 2018 Judgement Pronounced:28. h May, 2019 FAO (OS) (COMM) 29/2018 PENTEL KABUSHIKI KAISHA & ANR. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chandar M. Lall, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Banerjee, Mr. Afzal B. Khan, Mr. Debjyoti Sarkar, Mr. Rupin Bahl and Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocates. versus M/s ARORA STATIONERS & ORS CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia and Ms. Neelam Pathak, Advocates. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, read with order XLIII Rule 1(r) and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the order dated 08.01.2018 passed by a Single Judge of this Court whereby the application of the appellants bearing I.A. 6056/2017 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with...
Aman Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2917/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Umesh Mishra, Advocate with petitioners in person. Versus AMAN KUMAR & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr.M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sunil Kumar. Ms.Ritu Kumari, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.A.11771/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2917/2019 Quashing of FIR No.47/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, Delhi, is sought on the basis of Joint Statement of parties of 14th December, 2018 and affidavit of respondent No.2 of 23rd May, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the CRL.M.C. 2917/2019 Page 1 of 3 complainant of FIR in que...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »