Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Mehra vs.uoi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~25 * + Date of Decision:28. 05.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6045/2019 RAKESH MEHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shankar Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur and Ms. Himantika Saini Gaur, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vishal Mittal, Sr. Panel Counsel alongwith Santosh Kumar Pandey GP, for R-1 (UOI) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 20.3.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in OA No.2733/2013. The said original application of the petitioner has been rejected by the Tribunal, wherein he had assailed the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondents; the punishment order dated 9.3.2013 passed by the Disciplinary Authority removing the petitioner from services; as well as the order dated 20.07.2013 passed by the Appellate Authority dismissing his d...
Prashant Bhartiya vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 579/2019 & Crl.M.A. 2421/2019 PRASHANT BHARTIYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav Gupta, Ms. Almina, Ms. Mansi Gupta & Mr. Moazzam Ali, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.616/2018, under Section 376 IPC, registered at police station Vijay Vihar, Rohini, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 13th June, 2017 (Annexure P-3).... Petitioners counsel submits that there are no allegations of forced sex with the prosecutrix. Attention of this Court is drawn to this courts order of 12th December, 2018 in Bail Appln. 2408/2018 (Annexure P-5) to point out that prosecutrix was not divorced from her second husband and so, there can be no legal marriage, much less the promise of marriage. It is submitted by petitioners co...
State vs.anil Narang & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 97/2019 & CRL.M. A. 1625/2019 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State Versus ANIL NARANG & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajnish Kumar Gaud, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Impugned order of 12th October, 2018 declines to frame charge ORDER under Section 4IPC against first respondent, who is father-in-law of complainant and under Sections 498A/4IPC against second respondent, who is sister-in-law (nanad) of complainant. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for petitioner-State submits that the complainant of 15th April, 2015, which is the basis of charge- sheet, justifies framing of charges for the offences under Sections 498A/4IPC against respondents as there are specific allegations against the respondents. To submit so, attention of this Court is drawn to relevant paragraphs of the afore-referred complaint and the charge-sheet...
Dr. Isha Makker and Ors. Vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h May, 2019 DR. ISHA MAKKER AND ORS. + W.P.(C) 6150/2019 & CM APPLs.26443/2019, 26444/2019 Through: Mr. Angad Mehta, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. for DU ..... Respondent % 1. JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The petitioners are MBBS students of Jamia Hamdard University, who aspire to obtain Post Graduate degree/diploma, for which they appeared in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) 2019 (hereinafter referred to as NEET-PG2019).2. The manner in which the NEET-PG examination and allocation of seats to students, thereafter, works, is that a specific number of seats are earmarked for each University.3. Out of the said seats, 50% are reserved for being filled in from the All India quota and the students undertaking NEET and the balance 50% are treated as Institutional Quot...
M/S Teknow Consultants & Engineers Pvt Ltd vs.bharat Heavy Electricals ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved:11. hSeptember 2018 Judgement Pronounced:28. h May, 2019 + FAO(OS) 202/2017 M/S TEKNOW CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr.Karan Luthra and Ms.Malavika Lal, Advocates. versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pallav Kumar and Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 against the judgment dated 16.03.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge setting aside in part the Award of the Sole Arbitrator dated 30.04.2015 with regard to pendente lite interest. FAO(OS) 202/2017 Page 1 of 24 2. Some necessary facts, which are required ...
Ramesh Kumar vs.govt. Of Nctd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~24 & 8 * + Date of Decision:28. 05.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.5926/2019 ........ Petitioner RAMESH KUMAR Through: Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Beena and Mr. Hitesh Malik, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel GNCTD (Services) alongwith Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh and Ms. Sakshi Sairwal, Advocates. W.P.(C.) No.6044/2019 ISHWAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, Sr. Addv. with Ms. Beena and Mr. Hitesh Malik, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel GNCTD (Services) alongwith Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh and Ms. Sakshi Sairwal, Advocates. W.P.(C.) Nos.6044/2019 & 5926/2019 Page 1 of 12 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. These two writ petitions are directed against the common order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal,...
Raj Pratap @ Manoj Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :05.02.2018 Date of decision:28.05.2019 CRL.M.C.716/2016 & CRL.M.A.3076/2016 RAJ PRATAP @ MANOJ SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saurabh Tiwari, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State. Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Advocate with Mr. Samant Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The present petition filed by the petitioner nos. 1 to 3 namely Raj Pratap @ Manoj Singh s/o Shri Laxmi Narayan, Rakesh Kumar s/o Shri Baldev Ramani and Digamber Vishkarma s/o Shri Bhola Vishkarma respectively against the respondent no.1/ State arrayed as proforma party and the respondent no.2 Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, the owner of Mehta Medicos at Shop No.25, Gurunanak Market Block, Greater Kailash Part-1, New Delhi seeks quashing of the FIR No.100/2015 dated 03.03.2015 under Section 408 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P...
Manoj Sagwan & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2898/2019 MANOJ SAGWAN & ORS. Through: Mr.Anuj Kapoor, Advocate. Date of Order: May 28, 2019 ........ Petitioners Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Through: Mr.Izhar Ahmad, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Hari Man. Mr.Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee, Advocate with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.A.11695/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2898/2019 Quashing of FIR No.513/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Saket, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 15th January, 2019 (Annexure-C) and affidavit of 25th May, 2019 of second respondent. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by C...
Himalayan Heli Adventures Private Limited vs.utair India Private Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 21/2019 & I.A. No.6725/2019 HIMALAYAN HELI ADVENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED Date of Decision :28. h May, 2019 Through Mr.Kirit S. Javali, Mrs.Mana ........ Petitioner Imtiyangla and Ms.Priya Sharma, Advs. versus UTAIR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Smitakshi Talukdar and Mr.Rahul Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed inter-alia praying for the following reliefs: i) Pass an ad-interim measure of protection in favour of the... Petitioner in terms of Section 9 (ii) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for securing the amount of Rs.2,17,57,100 (Rupees two crores seventeen lacs fifty seven thousand and one hundred) by directing the Respondent No.1 company to deposit the said amount before this Hon'ble Court pending resoluti...
Stci Finance Ltd vs.cedar Infonet Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~OS-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(COMM) 247/2017 STCI FINANCE LTD Date of decision:28. 05.2019 ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Mr.Atul Sharma, and Mr.Abhishek Agarwal Mr.Abhinav Agarwal, Advs. versus CEDAR INFONET PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sandeep Aggarwal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ashim Vachher and Mr.Sumeet, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.7514/2019 1. This application is filed by the plaintiff under Order 37 Rule 6(b) read with section 151 CPC seeking a decree in terms of the prayers made in the accompanying suit.2. The accompanying suit is filed by the plaintiff under Order 37 seeking recovery of Rs.80,82,38,057.51 along with pendente lite and future interest and costs.3. The case of the plaintiff in the plaint was that a Loan Facility Agreement was executed between plaintiff company and defendant No.1 company on 17.11.2010 whereby loan facility of an amount of Rs.50,00,00,000.00 was granted by the plain...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »