Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Beejakshree Varman vs./S Worlds Window Impex India Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4571/2017 CRL.M.C. 4587/2017 CRL.M.C. 4588/2017 CRL.M.C. 4589/2017 CRL.M.C. 4590/2017 CRL.M.C. 2817/2018 BEEJAKSHREE VARMAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Akshay Singh and Ms.Tosha Versus Singh, Advocates M/S WORLDS WINDOW IMPEX INDIA PVT LTD..... Through: Mr.A.K. Babbar & Mr. Surinder Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Kumar, Advocates In the above captioned six petitions, quashing of six complaints ORDER under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the summoning orders is sought on the ground that the allegations levelled against petitioner are vague and that petitioner had resigned as Director of the accused-company on 19th July, 2014. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above captioned petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order while treating Crl.M.C. 4571/2017 as lead case.... Petitioners counsel subm...
Deep Malhotra and Anr. Vs.sh. U. P. Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~SB-1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:28. h May, 2019 Review Petition No.Cont. Cas (C) 454/2017 212/2019 & CM. No.23662/2019 in DEEP MALHOTRA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. R. K. Saini and Mr.Ankit Singh, Advs. Versus SH. U. P. SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms.Komal Sorout, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL CM. No.23662/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Review Petition No.212/2019 in CONT. CAS(C) 454/2017 1. The present Review Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking review of the order dated 03.05.2019, passed in Contempt Case No.454/2017.2. Notice. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/DDA accepts notice.3. Review of the final order dated 03.05.2019, has been sought by the petitioner on the grounds that the impugned order ...
Living Media India Limited vs.deputy Labour Commissioner and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :15. h May, 2017 Date of decision :28. h May, 2019 W.P.(C) 4048/2016 & CM.APPL.17072/2016 LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Setu Niket and Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Advs. versus DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.A. Sebastian, Advocate for R-2 None for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Living Media India Limited a newspaper establishment in terms of the Section 2(d) of the Working Journalists and other Newspapers Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to the Act) vide this petition has assailed the impugned order in the case bearing No.WJA/02/DLC/NDD/15/167 to 168 dated 12.04.2016 of the concerned Authority under the Working Journalists and other W.P.(C) 4048/2016 Page 1 of 40 Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and ...
Shikha Through Her Legal Guardian / Next Friend Mr. Raghubir Singh vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~23 & 24 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order :28. h May, 2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS SHIKHA THROUGH HER LEGAL GUARDIAN / NEXT FRIEND MR. RAGHUBIR SINGH versus ........ Petitioner MASTER UDAY DAS THORUTH HIS LEGAL GUARDIAN/ NEXT FRIEND MR. UTTAM DAS ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 6057/2019, CM Appl. 26118/2019 (stay) + W.P.(C) 6069/2019, CM Appl. 26192/2019 (stay) Present : Mr. Ajay Kohli & Ms. Pooja Vohra, Advocates for petitioners CORAM: in both items. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate in both items. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for R-2 with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate in both items. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL26119/2019 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 6057/2019 CM APPL26193/2019 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 6069/2019 1. Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C)...
Deepak Yadav vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2907/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Soti, Advocate with petitioner in person. Versus DEEPAK YADAV CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Pawan Kumar. Complainant in person. ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.150/2019 under Sectionsof IPC, registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2/complainant of 16th May, 2019 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2 who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pawan Kumar, on the basis of identity proof produced by her.... RESPONDENTS No.2 is...
Smt. Ritika Juneja vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2333/2019 & Crl.M.A. 9291/2019 SMT. RITIKA JUNEJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Gahlaut, Advocate STATE & ORS. Versus Through: Dr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State Mr. Harish K. Gupta & Mr. H.D. Dhanvi, Advocates for respondents No.2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Trial court vide impugned order of 3rd April, 2019 hs declined petitioners prayer for transfer of trial in FIR No.985/2015, under Sections 498A/406/506/377/3IPC, registered at police station Shalimar Bagh, Delhi to some other court by observing that efforts of the trial court to settle the matter amicably cannot be a ground to transfer the trial of this case to another court, as the genesis of this FIR case in a matrimonial discord. It is also observed in the impugned order that giving of short dates cannot be a ground to transfer trial of this case to Crl.M.C...
S S Thapar vs.l R Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h May, 2019 + CM (M) 880/2019 with CAV5872019 & CM Appl. 26281- 26282/2019 S S THAPAR Through: Mr. Suneet Bharadwaj, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus L R VERMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the judgment of the Trial Court dated 28.03.2019 in CS No.10039/2016. By the said judgment, the petitioner herein has been granted leave to defend the suit filed by the respondent under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, but this has been made conditional upon the petitioner depositing a sum of 34 lakhs. The petitioner challenges the imposition of the said condition.2. The suit filed by the respondent is for a decree in the sum of 85 lakhs. The contention of the plaintiff is that money was advanced to the petitioner/defendant by way of loans amounting to 74 l...
Kaushal Kishore vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. t February, 2019 Judgment delivered on:28. h May, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 129/2018 & Crl.M.A.2863/2018 KAUSHAL KISHORE ........ Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.A. Hashmi, Mr. Salman Hashmi, Mr. Sheezan Hashmi and Mr. Aditya P. Khanna, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor with Sub Inspector Sachin Kumar, Police Station South Campus. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order on charge dated 27.10.2017 whereby charge has been framed against the petitioner under Section 498A Indian Penal Code (IPC for short).2. Mr. Salve, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that Charge Sheet was filed both under Section 306 and Section 498A IPC, however, the Trial Court found insufficient mat...
Shri Swadesh Pal Arora vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h May, 2019 + TEST.CAS. 15/2019 SHRI SWADESH PAL ARORA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate. versus (M:9818610321) ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 2495/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. I.A. is disposed of. TEST.CAS. 15/2019 2. Present petition for grant of letters of administration has been filed by Shri Swadesh Pal Arora in respect of his brother Late Shri Rajinder Pal Aroras property bearing No.B-6, Gujrawala Town Part-I, Delhi-110009 (also known as Plot No.6, Block-B, Part-I, Gujranwala Cooperative Housing Building Society Limited) measuring 435 sq. yds (hereinafter, suit property). It is the case of the... Petitioner that his deceased brother was unmarried and had died intestate. He submits that father and mother of the... Petitioner died in 1961 and 1984 respectively. The... Petitioner had two mor...
Amarjeet Singh Bammi vs.sukhmani Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~6 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:28. 05.2019 F.A.O.No.217/2019 & C.M. No.25040/2019 AMARJEET SINGH BAMMI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms. Rosemary Raju, Ms. Upasana Goel & Ms.Aishwarya, Advocates with appellant in person. ....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar & Mr. Sameer Rai, Advocates with respondent in person. Versus SUKHMANI KAUR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) The impugned order dated 16.05.2019 passed by the court of 1. learned Additional District Juge-03, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (ADJ) in Civil Suit No.351/2019 dismissing the application of the appellant/plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal. The appellant/plaintiff filed a Civil Suit for permanent injunction against her daughter-in- law/respondent on the ground that he is the owner of the property No.D-16, Ashoka Niketan, Delhi admeasuring 275 sq. mtr. FAO No.217/2019 Page 1 of 9...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »