Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naval Kishore Kapoor vs.national Investigating Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 615/2019 % Judgment reserved on 21st May, 2019 Judgment pronounced on 28th May, 2019 NAVAL KISHORE KAPOOR ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Shariq J.Reyaz with Mr. Lakshay Dhamija and Mr. Sunav Rastogi, Advocates. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surinder Singh, Mr. Anoopam N. Prasad and Ms. Mehak Jaggi Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Act, 2008 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') assailing the order dated 06.02.2019 (hereinafter referred to as 'Impugned Order') passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, New Delhi District, Patiala House Court, New Delhi whereby cognizance was taken against the appellant for the offences punishabl...
State Through Cbi vs.kishor Kumar Kanungo & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.Appeal No.792/2003 Judgment reserved on :31. t January, 2018 Date of decision :28. h May, 2019 STATE THROUGH CBI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP for CBI. versus KISHOR KUMAR KANUNGO & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal and Ms. Toral Banerjee, Advocates. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The State through the CBI vide Criminal M.A. No.83/2003 sought leave to file the appeal against the impugned judgment dated 24.1.2003 of the learned Special Judge, Delhi in CC No.32/1993 RC No.50(A)/92/CBI/ACP, New Delhi vide which the three accused arrayed as the respondents herein were acquitted in relation to the charges framed against them of the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Section 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as well as for the substantive offences punishable under S...
Deepak Khosla vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6139/2019, CM Appls. 26423-24/2019 DEEPAK KHOSLA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ajay Kohli & Ms. Pooja Vohra, versus Advocates. CORAM: UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for R-2 with Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL264242019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6139/2019 3.... Petitioner claims to be a patient of Glaucoma with Macular Degeneration, which results in damage to the optic nerve and causes vision loss. It is also the case of the petitioner that he visited the clinic Nutech Mediworld at Green Park, New Delhi where stem cell treatments are provided. Since July, 2016 till March, 2019, petitioner claims that he has shown ...
Umesh Kumar Arora & Anr. Vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2909/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Gaurav Gupta and Mr.Jaspal Versus Singh, Advocates. UMESH KUMAR ARORA & ANR. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma, Additional CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Public Prosecutor for State with SI Suresh Chand. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.A.11736-37/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2909/2019 & Crl. M.A.11735/2019 Quashing of FIR No.203/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 16th March, 2019 (Annexure-P-3) and affidavit of respondent No.2 of 23rd May, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant of F...
Savita @ Sakshi vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 CRL.M.C. 705/2019 & Crl.M.A. 2890/2019 SAVITA @ SAKSHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Pawar, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1-State with SI Sikander Gautam. Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is the complainant of FIR No.587/2007, registered at police station Sarita Vihar, Delhi, whose application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for summoning the Record Keeper of Arya Samaj Vedic Temple has been dismissed although the additional charge under Section 494 IPC was framed against accused Harinder Chaudhary vide order of 17th November, 2018. In the impugned order of 3rd December, 2018, the reason put-forth to decline petitioners application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is that vide Crl.M.C. 705/2019 Page 1 of 2 order of 17th N...
All Services Global Private Limited vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6143/2019 ALL SERVICES GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner CORAM: UNION OF INDIA Through Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Ms. Chitra, Ms. Jyoti & Ms. Geetam Jangra, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jagjit Singh & Mr. Preet Singh, Advocates HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM Appl. 26434/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6143/2019 3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs : (A) grant a writ of certiorarified mandamus, and/or any such other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby calling for the entire record relating to the e-tender notification issued by the respondent in tender number M442-3-Mcc-A-Cat-Stn-Prt [Annexure p-2]. publish...
Mohd Javed & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1682019 & CM No.11617/2019 Reserved on:13. h May, 2019 Date of decision:28. h May, 2019 ..... Appellants MOHD JAVED & ANR. Through: Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. With Bilal Anwar Khan, Mr. Mohd. Sajid and Mr. Suroosh Anwar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC and Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr. Abhishek K. Singh, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.By the present appeal filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Delhi High Court, the appellants Mohd. Javed (appellant No.1) and Nausheen Naz (appellant No.2) impugn order dated 28.02.2019 made by the learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.1835/2019, whereby the LPA1682019 page 1 of 36 single Judge has been pleased to dismiss the writ petition, thereby upholding the Leave India No...
Sh. r.k. Naidu vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + % W.P.(C) 6049/2019 SH. R.K. NAIDU Date of Decision:28.05.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shankar Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur and Ms. Himantika Saini Gaur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. R.M. Tripathi, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Advocate for CVC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.26103/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6049/2019 & CM APPL. 26102/2019 W.P.(C.) No.6049/2019 Page 1 of 10 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 24.04.2019 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.1275/2019. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application wherein the petitioner had assailed the charge memorandum dated 01.02.2019 issued to him, in respect whereof, the resp...
Surinder Kumar Aggarwal vs.moti Gupta Jagdish Kumar Gupta & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h May, 2019. + EX.P. 336/2014 SURINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Mr. Rameezuddin Raja & Mr. Shakti Verma, Advocates (M-9899347995) versus MOTI GUPTA JAGDISH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Arjun Dev, Proxy counsel (M- 9873045000) Mr. Jawahar Chawla, Advocate for Mr. Mridul Gupta. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present execution petition was disposed of vide order dated 31st July, 2018 after recording the settlement between the parties. The said order reads as under: 1. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. This is an execution petition seeking to execute the judgment and decree dated 15th December, 2013 passed by the Commercial Plenary Court in Dubai. The case of the decree holder who was the Plaintiff in the said Court is that the Plaintiff lent a sum of AED1500,000/- (AED one million and the Defendant No.2. In acknowle...
Nittin Johari vs.sfio
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 28, 2019 + BAIL APPLN.1377/2019 NITTIN JOHARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Mr. Pradyuman Kaistha and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocates Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC and SFIO Mr. Olson Nair, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER... Petitioner seeks two weeks interim bail in case No.5/5/2016/CL-II to perform the funeral ceremonies of his mother who had died on 24th May, 2019.... Petitioner had earlier approached this Court for interim bail to get his mother treated and this Court vide order of 17th May, 2019 had declined interim bail but had permitted him to meet his mother while in custody. Similar prayer, as made in this petition, was made before trial court. Vide order of 24th May, 2019, trial court has declined interim bail to petitioner but had permitted him to perform the funeral ceremonies of his mother while in cus...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »