Delhi Court May 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gajinder Singh vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~1 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"29th May, 2019 Crl.Appeal No.971/2001 & Crl.M.A. 10607-08/2019 GAJINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh & Mr. Bahul Kalra, Advs. with appellant in custody. versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Dinesh Kumar, PS Kamla Market CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant along with one another (Arun Kumar) was tried by the court of additional sessions judge in sessions case (26/2000) registered on the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.454/1997 of police station Kamla Market and was held guilty, by judgment dated 12.10.2001, on charge for offence under Section 3IPC read with Section 397 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). By subsequent order dated 16.10.2001, the trial Judge awarded rigoro...
Rajender Singh vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 29, 2019 CRL.M.C. 2932/2019 & Crl.M.A. 11821-22/2019 RAJENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pushpinder Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State ASI Rajbir Singh. Mr. Prabjeet Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.265/2017, under Sections 323/341/354/354(B) of IPC, registered at Police Station Khyala, Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir Singh, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Crl.M.C. 293...
Ritika Jain vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University& Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~77, 78, 79, 81, 83, 84 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Reserved on:17. h May, 2019 Date of pronouncement:29. h May, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12219/2018 & CM APPL. 19621/2019, 19622/2019 RITIKA JAIN Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr.Adv with Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Adv for R-1. Mr. R. K. Saini and Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advs. + W.P.(C) 12780/2018 & CM APPL. 19629/2019, 19630/2019 SAURABH PUJARI ........ Petitioner Through versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv for R-1 + W.P.(C) 12807/2018 ABRA SHAH & ANR versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Adv. GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 12219/2018 and other connected matters Page 1 of 43 Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Sr.Adv with Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Adv for R-1. Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv...
Yashpal @ Pankaj vs.state (Govt. Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1340/2019 YASHPAL @ PANKAJ versus STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Dharam Raj Ohlan and Mr. Pradeep Dahiya, Advs. For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Raj Kumar, SI Balram, P.S.J.P.Kalan. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.215/2018 under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 IPC, Police Station Jaffarpur Kalan.2.... Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The petitioner has been in custody since 30.12.2018. Deceased was married to the petitioner on 23.11.2017.3. FIR was registered consequent to the complaint lodged by the father of the deceased. He contended that he had spent approximately BAIL APPLN.1340/2019 Page 1 of 3 Rs. 25 lakhs on the marriage of his daughter, given 20 tola...
Chander Kanta Mishra & Anr vs.raj Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~17 * % + Delivered on :29. h May, 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 648/2019 CHANDER KANTA MISHRA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Ms.Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Asmita Narula, Advocate. versus RAJ SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Manpreet Kaur and Mr.Jaya Goyal, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.S.C.Sharma and Mr.Charan Singh, Advocates for respondents No.4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.This petition is against the impugned order dated 24.12.2018 1. whereby an application of the petitioners under Order XXII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed.2. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner alleged late Major (Retd) Bhim Raj Sharma was predecessor in interest and ancestor of the parties.... Petitioner No.1 is widow daughter of late Major (Retd) Bhim Raj Sharma; petitioner No.2 is son of late Major (Retd) Bhim Raj Sharma; respondents No.1 to 3 are legal heirs of deceased Pradeep Sharma; and...
Atul Gupta & Ors vs.banarsi Das & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order 29.05.2019 + FAO1242019 ATUL GUPTA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Sameer Vashisht, Advocate with Mr.Dhruv Rohatgi, Advocate. versus BANARSI DAS & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Vineet Kumar Singh, Advocate for R1 along with both respondents in person. and R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2905.2019 VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CM No.13697/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No.13696/2019 (for delay) 2. For the justifiable reasons explained in the application, the delay of 44 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. FAO1242019 & CM No.13695/2019 (for stay) 4. The order dated 23.10.2018 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-14, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, FAO1242019 Page 1 of 3 Delhi (ADJ) in Civil Suit No.1363/2018, dismissing the application of the appellant/plaintiff under Order...
Seven Islands Shipping Limited and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 05.2019 Pronounced on:29. 05.2019 CM APPLN. 14120/2019 in W.P.(C) 3070/2019 $~1 to 4 * + SAMSON MARITIME LTD. AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Mr.Rishi Agarwal, Mr.Amitava R. Majumdar, Mr.Karan Luthra, Mr.Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms.Manjira Das Gupta, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Pinky Anand, ASG with Ms.Saudamini Sharma, Mr.Balendu Shekhar & Mr.Sumit Teterwal, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-3 & 4. Mr.Rajesh Ranjan, Adv. with Ms.Kritika Sachdeva, Adv. for Shipyards Association of India. CM APPLN. 14123/2019 in W.P.(C) 3071/2019 THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Mr.Rishi Agarwal, Mr.Amitava R. Majumdar, Mr.Karan Luthra, Mr.Pranjit Bhattacharya & Mr Adit Pujari, Advs. versus + W.P.(C) 3070/2019 & batch matters P age 1 of 25 ...
Raj Bahadur Chauhan vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :11th February, 2019 Judgment delivered on:29. hMay, 2019 + CRL.REV. P. 817/2017&Crl.M.A.17634/2017 RAJ BAHADUR CHAUHAN ........ Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI &ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj and Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advs. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Sunil Kapoor, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 21.08.2017 whereby charge has been framed against the petitioner under Section 120B Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) and Section 328 read with Section 376 IPC.2. Subject FIR No.857/2016 under Section 376/120B/3IPC was registered on the complaint of the prosecutrix. As per the allegations in the FIR, the co-accused is alleged to have convinced her that he was a good person and she should get married to him. It ...
Abdesh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~34 * + Date of Decision:29. 05.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.126/2019 Through: Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ABDESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Mr. Jitendra Kr. Tripathi and Mr. Kartikeya Rastogi, Advocates for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the Memorandum dated 30.12.2018 whereby the petitioner has been declared medically unfit for enrolment in Indian Air Force. According to the petitioner, on 6.12.2017 the Indian Air Force had invited online applications for selection to the post of Airmen in Group X and Y. The petitioner submitted his application for the said posts and in the Phase-I test the petitioner performed well, and was declared shortlisted for Phase II in Group X. Thereafter, the petitioner was declared shortlisted for...
Jamalluddin Sabri vs.rajesh Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2019
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h May, 2019 + CONT. CAS(C) 507/2019 % JAMALLUDDIN SABRI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. C.S. Rathour, Mr. S.D. Tiwari and Mr. V.P. Singh, Advs. versus RAJESH CHAUDHARY Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Contempt Case 507/2019 1. This petition seeks initiation of proceedings against the respondent/alleged contemnor for having committed contempt of this Court, by failing to comply with the directions contained in the order dated 23rd April, 2019, passed by this Court in CM No.18723/2019 in W.P.(C) 842/2019. The said order reads thus : The petitioner seeks appointment of a Local Commissioner. He claims to be the owner and in lawful possession of the lands identified as Khasra No.634/402, 407 and 408, shown in pink colour in the map annexed with the main petition. It is his grievance that the DDA has forcibly entered into the said land and/or has permitted the Kendriy...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »